Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season

Safety surveillance is required for each season’s influenza vaccines to rapidly detect and evaluate potential new safety concerns before the peak period of immunization. Here we report the results of an enhanced passive safety surveillance for a trivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Main Authors: Sonja Gandhi-Banga, Anne-Laure Chabanon, Cecile Eymin, Timothy Caroe, Karina Butler, Annick Moureau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-09-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1581538
_version_ 1851872044205998080
author Sonja Gandhi-Banga
Anne-Laure Chabanon
Cecile Eymin
Timothy Caroe
Karina Butler
Annick Moureau
author_facet Sonja Gandhi-Banga
Anne-Laure Chabanon
Cecile Eymin
Timothy Caroe
Karina Butler
Annick Moureau
author_sort Sonja Gandhi-Banga
collection DOAJ
container_title Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
description Safety surveillance is required for each season’s influenza vaccines to rapidly detect and evaluate potential new safety concerns before the peak period of immunization. Here we report the results of an enhanced passive safety surveillance for a trivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3; Vaxigrip®), an intradermal version of this vaccine (IIV3-ID; Intanza® 15 µg), and a recently licensed quadrivalent version (IIV4; VaxigripTetraTM) during the 2017/18 influenza season in the UK and Republic of Ireland. The primary objective was to determine the rates of adverse reactions (ARs) occurring within 7 days following routine vaccination. Between September and November 2017, 979 safety report cards were distributed to vaccinees receiving IIV3-ID, 1005 to those receiving IIV3, and 957 to those receiving IIV4. At least one AR was reported by 28 participants (2.9%) vaccinated with IIV3-ID, 14 participants (1.4%) vaccinated with IIV3, and 20 participants (2.1%) vaccinated with IIV4. The most frequent ARs were injection-site reactions and headache. One participant vaccinated with IIV3-ID reported two suspected serious ARs (dyskinesia and a shock symptom), although these could not be confirmed as vaccine-related. Rates of ARs for IIV3 and IIV3-ID for 2017/18 did not differ from the 2016/17 rates. For IIV4, in its first season since licensure, AR frequencies were similar to those in the Summary of Product Characteristics. In conclusion, no change was found compared to the known or expected AR rates for IIV3, IIV3-ID, or IIV4 during the 2017/18 season.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e9c6787f72f4a5b925bbff12cb76328
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2164-5515
2164-554X
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-4e9c6787f72f4a5b925bbff12cb763282025-08-19T22:16:29ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics2164-55152164-554X2019-09-011592154215810.1080/21645515.2019.15815381581538Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 seasonSonja Gandhi-Banga0Anne-Laure Chabanon1Cecile Eymin2Timothy Caroe3Karina Butler4Annick Moureau5Sanofi PasteurSanofi PasteurSanofi PasteurLighthouse Medical PracticeOur Lady’s Children’s HospitalSanofi PasteurSafety surveillance is required for each season’s influenza vaccines to rapidly detect and evaluate potential new safety concerns before the peak period of immunization. Here we report the results of an enhanced passive safety surveillance for a trivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3; Vaxigrip®), an intradermal version of this vaccine (IIV3-ID; Intanza® 15 µg), and a recently licensed quadrivalent version (IIV4; VaxigripTetraTM) during the 2017/18 influenza season in the UK and Republic of Ireland. The primary objective was to determine the rates of adverse reactions (ARs) occurring within 7 days following routine vaccination. Between September and November 2017, 979 safety report cards were distributed to vaccinees receiving IIV3-ID, 1005 to those receiving IIV3, and 957 to those receiving IIV4. At least one AR was reported by 28 participants (2.9%) vaccinated with IIV3-ID, 14 participants (1.4%) vaccinated with IIV3, and 20 participants (2.1%) vaccinated with IIV4. The most frequent ARs were injection-site reactions and headache. One participant vaccinated with IIV3-ID reported two suspected serious ARs (dyskinesia and a shock symptom), although these could not be confirmed as vaccine-related. Rates of ARs for IIV3 and IIV3-ID for 2017/18 did not differ from the 2016/17 rates. For IIV4, in its first season since licensure, AR frequencies were similar to those in the Summary of Product Characteristics. In conclusion, no change was found compared to the known or expected AR rates for IIV3, IIV3-ID, or IIV4 during the 2017/18 season.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1581538influenza vaccinesvaccinationsafetysafety surveillanceseasonal influenzaadverse reactionadverse eventreactogenicityimmunization
spellingShingle Sonja Gandhi-Banga
Anne-Laure Chabanon
Cecile Eymin
Timothy Caroe
Karina Butler
Annick Moureau
Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season
influenza vaccines
vaccination
safety
safety surveillance
seasonal influenza
adverse reaction
adverse event
reactogenicity
immunization
title Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season
title_full Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season
title_fullStr Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season
title_short Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season
title_sort enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the uk and the republic of ireland during the 2017 18 season
topic influenza vaccines
vaccination
safety
safety surveillance
seasonal influenza
adverse reaction
adverse event
reactogenicity
immunization
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1581538
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjagandhibanga enhancedpassivesafetysurveillanceofthreemarketedinfluenzavaccinesintheukandtherepublicofirelandduringthe201718season
AT annelaurechabanon enhancedpassivesafetysurveillanceofthreemarketedinfluenzavaccinesintheukandtherepublicofirelandduringthe201718season
AT cecileeymin enhancedpassivesafetysurveillanceofthreemarketedinfluenzavaccinesintheukandtherepublicofirelandduringthe201718season
AT timothycaroe enhancedpassivesafetysurveillanceofthreemarketedinfluenzavaccinesintheukandtherepublicofirelandduringthe201718season
AT karinabutler enhancedpassivesafetysurveillanceofthreemarketedinfluenzavaccinesintheukandtherepublicofirelandduringthe201718season
AT annickmoureau enhancedpassivesafetysurveillanceofthreemarketedinfluenzavaccinesintheukandtherepublicofirelandduringthe201718season