A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
Friction has long been an important issue in multibody dynamics. Static friction models apply appropriate regularization techniques to convert the stick inequality and the non-smooth stick–slip transition of Coulomb’s approach into a continuous and smooth function of the sliding velocity. However, a...
| Published in: | Modelling |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-08-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/4/3/21 |
| _version_ | 1851911686982729728 |
|---|---|
| author | Georg Rill Matthias Schuderer |
| author_facet | Georg Rill Matthias Schuderer |
| author_sort | Georg Rill |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Modelling |
| description | Friction has long been an important issue in multibody dynamics. Static friction models apply appropriate regularization techniques to convert the stick inequality and the non-smooth stick–slip transition of Coulomb’s approach into a continuous and smooth function of the sliding velocity. However, a regularized friction force is not able to maintain long-term stick. That is why dynamic friction models were developed in recent decades. The friction force depends herein not only on the sliding velocity but also on internal states. The probably best-known representative, the LuGre friction model, is based on a fictitious bristle but realizes a too-simple approximation. The recently published second-order dynamic friction model describes the dynamics of a fictitious bristle more accurately. It is based on a regularized friction force characteristic, which is continuous and smooth but can maintain long-term stick due to an appropriate shift in the regularization. Its performance is compared here to stick–slip friction models, developed and launched not long ago by commercial multibody software packages. The results obtained by a virtual friction test-bench and by a more practical festoon cable system are very promising. Thus, the second-order dynamic friction model may serve not only as an alternative to the LuGre model but also to commercial stick–slip models. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4ecc17fc897f4e32a0a4d1777ab97d0b |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2673-3951 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-4ecc17fc897f4e32a0a4d1777ab97d0b2025-08-19T22:01:42ZengMDPI AGModelling2673-39512023-08-014336638110.3390/modelling4030021A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip ModelsGeorg Rill0Matthias Schuderer1Mechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Galgenbergstr. 30, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyMechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Galgenbergstr. 30, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyFriction has long been an important issue in multibody dynamics. Static friction models apply appropriate regularization techniques to convert the stick inequality and the non-smooth stick–slip transition of Coulomb’s approach into a continuous and smooth function of the sliding velocity. However, a regularized friction force is not able to maintain long-term stick. That is why dynamic friction models were developed in recent decades. The friction force depends herein not only on the sliding velocity but also on internal states. The probably best-known representative, the LuGre friction model, is based on a fictitious bristle but realizes a too-simple approximation. The recently published second-order dynamic friction model describes the dynamics of a fictitious bristle more accurately. It is based on a regularized friction force characteristic, which is continuous and smooth but can maintain long-term stick due to an appropriate shift in the regularization. Its performance is compared here to stick–slip friction models, developed and launched not long ago by commercial multibody software packages. The results obtained by a virtual friction test-bench and by a more practical festoon cable system are very promising. Thus, the second-order dynamic friction model may serve not only as an alternative to the LuGre model but also to commercial stick–slip models.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/4/3/21dynamic friction modelcommercial stick–slip friction modelslong-term stickmultibody dynamics |
| spellingShingle | Georg Rill Matthias Schuderer A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models dynamic friction model commercial stick–slip friction models long-term stick multibody dynamics |
| title | A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models |
| title_full | A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models |
| title_fullStr | A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models |
| title_short | A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models |
| title_sort | second order dynamic friction model compared to commercial stick slip models |
| topic | dynamic friction model commercial stick–slip friction models long-term stick multibody dynamics |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/4/3/21 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT georgrill asecondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels AT matthiasschuderer asecondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels AT georgrill secondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels AT matthiasschuderer secondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels |
