A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models

Friction has long been an important issue in multibody dynamics. Static friction models apply appropriate regularization techniques to convert the stick inequality and the non-smooth stick–slip transition of Coulomb’s approach into a continuous and smooth function of the sliding velocity. However, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modelling
Main Authors: Georg Rill, Matthias Schuderer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/4/3/21
_version_ 1851911686982729728
author Georg Rill
Matthias Schuderer
author_facet Georg Rill
Matthias Schuderer
author_sort Georg Rill
collection DOAJ
container_title Modelling
description Friction has long been an important issue in multibody dynamics. Static friction models apply appropriate regularization techniques to convert the stick inequality and the non-smooth stick–slip transition of Coulomb’s approach into a continuous and smooth function of the sliding velocity. However, a regularized friction force is not able to maintain long-term stick. That is why dynamic friction models were developed in recent decades. The friction force depends herein not only on the sliding velocity but also on internal states. The probably best-known representative, the LuGre friction model, is based on a fictitious bristle but realizes a too-simple approximation. The recently published second-order dynamic friction model describes the dynamics of a fictitious bristle more accurately. It is based on a regularized friction force characteristic, which is continuous and smooth but can maintain long-term stick due to an appropriate shift in the regularization. Its performance is compared here to stick–slip friction models, developed and launched not long ago by commercial multibody software packages. The results obtained by a virtual friction test-bench and by a more practical festoon cable system are very promising. Thus, the second-order dynamic friction model may serve not only as an alternative to the LuGre model but also to commercial stick–slip models.
format Article
id doaj-art-4ecc17fc897f4e32a0a4d1777ab97d0b
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2673-3951
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-4ecc17fc897f4e32a0a4d1777ab97d0b2025-08-19T22:01:42ZengMDPI AGModelling2673-39512023-08-014336638110.3390/modelling4030021A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip ModelsGeorg Rill0Matthias Schuderer1Mechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Galgenbergstr. 30, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyMechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Galgenbergstr. 30, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyFriction has long been an important issue in multibody dynamics. Static friction models apply appropriate regularization techniques to convert the stick inequality and the non-smooth stick–slip transition of Coulomb’s approach into a continuous and smooth function of the sliding velocity. However, a regularized friction force is not able to maintain long-term stick. That is why dynamic friction models were developed in recent decades. The friction force depends herein not only on the sliding velocity but also on internal states. The probably best-known representative, the LuGre friction model, is based on a fictitious bristle but realizes a too-simple approximation. The recently published second-order dynamic friction model describes the dynamics of a fictitious bristle more accurately. It is based on a regularized friction force characteristic, which is continuous and smooth but can maintain long-term stick due to an appropriate shift in the regularization. Its performance is compared here to stick–slip friction models, developed and launched not long ago by commercial multibody software packages. The results obtained by a virtual friction test-bench and by a more practical festoon cable system are very promising. Thus, the second-order dynamic friction model may serve not only as an alternative to the LuGre model but also to commercial stick–slip models.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/4/3/21dynamic friction modelcommercial stick–slip friction modelslong-term stickmultibody dynamics
spellingShingle Georg Rill
Matthias Schuderer
A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
dynamic friction model
commercial stick–slip friction models
long-term stick
multibody dynamics
title A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
title_full A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
title_fullStr A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
title_full_unstemmed A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
title_short A Second-Order Dynamic Friction Model Compared to Commercial Stick–Slip Models
title_sort second order dynamic friction model compared to commercial stick slip models
topic dynamic friction model
commercial stick–slip friction models
long-term stick
multibody dynamics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/4/3/21
work_keys_str_mv AT georgrill asecondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels
AT matthiasschuderer asecondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels
AT georgrill secondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels
AT matthiasschuderer secondorderdynamicfrictionmodelcomparedtocommercialstickslipmodels