Economic consequences of cascading drought-flood events: evidence from central Europe

Cascading drought-flood events (CDFEs), also referred to as ‘drought-to-flood transitions’ or ‘drought–flood abrupt alternations,’ in which a flood follows a period of drought, may have different flood generation mechanisms than floods occurring independently from drought, as the drought could affec...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Environmental Research Letters
主要な著者: Siqi Deng, Ravi Kumar Guntu, Shahin Khosh Bin Ghomash, Dongsheng Zhao, Heidi Kreibich
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae0f43
その他の書誌記述
要約:Cascading drought-flood events (CDFEs), also referred to as ‘drought-to-flood transitions’ or ‘drought–flood abrupt alternations,’ in which a flood follows a period of drought, may have different flood generation mechanisms than floods occurring independently from drought, as the drought could affect soil infiltration rates and, consequently, runoff dynamics. With the increasing frequency of extreme weather events driven by climate change, understanding the cascading nature of drought and flood events has become crucial for effective disaster risk management. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence on how these drought-flood interactions work and translate to economic losses. This study addresses this gap by identifying CDFEs and flood-only events (FEs) across Central Europe and linking them to their flood impacts from the modelled Historical Analysis of Natural Hazards in Europe database. CDFEs are associated with significantly higher maximum daily mean streamflow (58.51 m ^3 s ^−1 vs 38.20 m ^3 s ^−1 ), deeper mean water depths (1.90 m vs 1.88 m), and greater economic losses (€33.09 million km ^−2 vs €29.75 million km ^−2 ) compared to FEs. These findings underscore the special features of CDFEs and the need to take them into account in flood risk management.
ISSN:1748-9326