Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation

The observation of photosynthetic biofilms growing on the Fine Residue Deposit (FRD) kimberlite produced by the Venetia Diamond Mine, Limpopo, South Africa suggests that processed kimberlite supports bacterial growth. The presence of this biofilm may aid in the acceleration of weathering of this ult...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Climate
Main Authors: Thomas Ray Jones, Jordan Poitras, Alan Levett, Guilherme da Silva, Samadhi Gunathunga, Benjamin Ryan, Andrew Vietti, Andrew Langendam, Gordon Southam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-07-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1345085/full
_version_ 1850395812802068480
author Thomas Ray Jones
Thomas Ray Jones
Jordan Poitras
Alan Levett
Guilherme da Silva
Samadhi Gunathunga
Benjamin Ryan
Andrew Vietti
Andrew Langendam
Gordon Southam
author_facet Thomas Ray Jones
Thomas Ray Jones
Jordan Poitras
Alan Levett
Guilherme da Silva
Samadhi Gunathunga
Benjamin Ryan
Andrew Vietti
Andrew Langendam
Gordon Southam
author_sort Thomas Ray Jones
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Climate
description The observation of photosynthetic biofilms growing on the Fine Residue Deposit (FRD) kimberlite produced by the Venetia Diamond Mine, Limpopo, South Africa suggests that processed kimberlite supports bacterial growth. The presence of this biofilm may aid in the acceleration of weathering of this ultra-mafic host material – a process that can sequester CO2 via carbon mineralization. Laboratory and field trial experiments were undertaken to understand the microbe–mineral interactions occurring in these systems, and how these interactions impact geochemical cycling and carbonate precipitation. At laboratory scale it was discovered that using kimberlite as a growth supplement increased biomass production (up to 25-fold) and promoted microbiome diversity, while the inoculation of FRD systems aided in the aggregation, settling, and dewatering of kimberlitic slurries. Field trial studies combining photosynthetic biofilms (cultured in 3 × 1,000 L bioreactors) with FRD material were initiated to better understand microbially enhanced mineral carbonation across different depths, and under field environmental conditions. Over the 15-month experiment the microbial populations shifted with the kimberlitic environmental pressure, with the control and inoculated systems converging. The natural endogenous biosphere (control) and the inoculum accelerated carbonate precipitation across the entire 40 cm bioreactor depth, producing average 15-month carbonation rates of 0.57 wt.% and 1.17 wt.%, respectively. This corresponds to an annual CO2e mine offset of ~4.48% and ~ 9.2%, respectively. Millimetre-centimetre scale secondary carbonate that formed in the inoculated bioreactors was determined to be biogenic in nature (i.e., possessing microbial fossils) and took the form of radiating colloform precipitates with the addition of new, mineralized colonies. Surficial conditions resulted in the largest production of secondary carbonate, consistent with a ca. 12% mine site CO2e annual offset after a 15-month incubation period.
format Article
id doaj-art-513d3d4a2f6d4300ab05ab2a26b5f044
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2624-9553
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-513d3d4a2f6d4300ab05ab2a26b5f0442025-08-19T22:52:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Climate2624-95532024-07-01610.3389/fclim.2024.13450851345085Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonationThomas Ray Jones0Thomas Ray Jones1Jordan Poitras2Alan Levett3Guilherme da Silva4Samadhi Gunathunga5Benjamin Ryan6Andrew Vietti7Andrew Langendam8Gordon Southam9School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, AustraliaCSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, AustraliaCartledge Mining and Geotechnics, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaVietti Slurrytec, Johannesburg, South AfricaThe Australian Synchrotron (ANSTO), Clayton, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, AustraliaThe observation of photosynthetic biofilms growing on the Fine Residue Deposit (FRD) kimberlite produced by the Venetia Diamond Mine, Limpopo, South Africa suggests that processed kimberlite supports bacterial growth. The presence of this biofilm may aid in the acceleration of weathering of this ultra-mafic host material – a process that can sequester CO2 via carbon mineralization. Laboratory and field trial experiments were undertaken to understand the microbe–mineral interactions occurring in these systems, and how these interactions impact geochemical cycling and carbonate precipitation. At laboratory scale it was discovered that using kimberlite as a growth supplement increased biomass production (up to 25-fold) and promoted microbiome diversity, while the inoculation of FRD systems aided in the aggregation, settling, and dewatering of kimberlitic slurries. Field trial studies combining photosynthetic biofilms (cultured in 3 × 1,000 L bioreactors) with FRD material were initiated to better understand microbially enhanced mineral carbonation across different depths, and under field environmental conditions. Over the 15-month experiment the microbial populations shifted with the kimberlitic environmental pressure, with the control and inoculated systems converging. The natural endogenous biosphere (control) and the inoculum accelerated carbonate precipitation across the entire 40 cm bioreactor depth, producing average 15-month carbonation rates of 0.57 wt.% and 1.17 wt.%, respectively. This corresponds to an annual CO2e mine offset of ~4.48% and ~ 9.2%, respectively. Millimetre-centimetre scale secondary carbonate that formed in the inoculated bioreactors was determined to be biogenic in nature (i.e., possessing microbial fossils) and took the form of radiating colloform precipitates with the addition of new, mineralized colonies. Surficial conditions resulted in the largest production of secondary carbonate, consistent with a ca. 12% mine site CO2e annual offset after a 15-month incubation period.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1345085/fullkimberlitemineral carbonationphotosynthetic biofilmcarbon sequestrationbioaugmentation
spellingShingle Thomas Ray Jones
Thomas Ray Jones
Jordan Poitras
Alan Levett
Guilherme da Silva
Samadhi Gunathunga
Benjamin Ryan
Andrew Vietti
Andrew Langendam
Gordon Southam
Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation
kimberlite
mineral carbonation
photosynthetic biofilm
carbon sequestration
bioaugmentation
title Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation
title_full Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation
title_fullStr Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation
title_full_unstemmed Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation
title_short Microbe-mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits: impacts on mineral carbonation
title_sort microbe mineral interactions within kimberlitic fine residue deposits impacts on mineral carbonation
topic kimberlite
mineral carbonation
photosynthetic biofilm
carbon sequestration
bioaugmentation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1345085/full
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrayjones microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT thomasrayjones microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT jordanpoitras microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT alanlevett microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT guilhermedasilva microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT samadhigunathunga microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT benjaminryan microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT andrewvietti microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT andrewlangendam microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation
AT gordonsoutham microbemineralinteractionswithinkimberliticfineresiduedepositsimpactsonmineralcarbonation