Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China

As a unique environmental regulation in China, the official accountability audit was piloted in 2014. With a focus on prioritizing the ecological environment, officials in pilot districts have implemented economic construction, adjusted industrial structures, and promoted coordinated development bet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment
Main Author: Yu Xia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2024-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426224000251
_version_ 1849919214619459584
author Yu Xia
author_facet Yu Xia
author_sort Yu Xia
collection DOAJ
container_title Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment
description As a unique environmental regulation in China, the official accountability audit was piloted in 2014. With a focus on prioritizing the ecological environment, officials in pilot districts have implemented economic construction, adjusted industrial structures, and promoted coordinated development between the economy and environment. The effects of implementation have garnered widespread attention from society. However, there is limited research on the impact of an accountability audit on industrial structure adjustments. Using the “Accountability Audit of Officials for Natural Resource Assets (Trial)” released in 2015 as a quasi-natural experiment, this study collected panel data from 279 cities between 2013 and 2017. It then empirically analyzed the impact mechanism and effects of the accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment using the Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Differences model. The research findings indicate that the accountability audit directly impacted industrial structure adjustment, promoting the upgrading of the primary industry to the secondary industry and restricting the development of the tertiary industry. In addition, the audit is beneficial for enterprise entry, but not conducive to technological innovation, and has no significant impact on foreign direct investment. This conclusion fills a gap in the existing research and provides valuable insights for policymakers.
format Article
id doaj-art-555b20b9dd4441fb94de0792087e5d0b
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2325-4262
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-555b20b9dd4441fb94de0792087e5d0b2025-08-20T00:56:46ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment2325-42622024-06-0122216717510.1016/j.cjpre.2024.06.007Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in ChinaYu Xia0Department of Economics, Syracuse University, Syracuse 13244, United StatesAs a unique environmental regulation in China, the official accountability audit was piloted in 2014. With a focus on prioritizing the ecological environment, officials in pilot districts have implemented economic construction, adjusted industrial structures, and promoted coordinated development between the economy and environment. The effects of implementation have garnered widespread attention from society. However, there is limited research on the impact of an accountability audit on industrial structure adjustments. Using the “Accountability Audit of Officials for Natural Resource Assets (Trial)” released in 2015 as a quasi-natural experiment, this study collected panel data from 279 cities between 2013 and 2017. It then empirically analyzed the impact mechanism and effects of the accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment using the Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Differences model. The research findings indicate that the accountability audit directly impacted industrial structure adjustment, promoting the upgrading of the primary industry to the secondary industry and restricting the development of the tertiary industry. In addition, the audit is beneficial for enterprise entry, but not conducive to technological innovation, and has no significant impact on foreign direct investment. This conclusion fills a gap in the existing research and provides valuable insights for policymakers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426224000251Accountability auditDifference-in-differences modelEnvironmental regulationIndustrial structure adjustmentQuasi-natural experiment
spellingShingle Yu Xia
Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China
Accountability audit
Difference-in-differences model
Environmental regulation
Industrial structure adjustment
Quasi-natural experiment
title Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China
title_full Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China
title_fullStr Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China
title_short Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China
title_sort impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment a case study of environmental regulation in china
topic Accountability audit
Difference-in-differences model
Environmental regulation
Industrial structure adjustment
Quasi-natural experiment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426224000251
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxia impactofanofficialaccountabilityauditonindustrialstructureadjustmentacasestudyofenvironmentalregulationinchina