Correlations in the EPR State Observables
The identification and physical interpretation of arbitrary quantum correlations are not always effortless. Two features that can significantly influence the dispersion of the joint observable outcomes in a quantum bipartite system composed of systems I and II are: (a) All possible pairs of observab...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Entropy |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
MDPI AG
2024-05-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/6/476 |
| _version_ | 1850102521988644864 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel F. Orsini Luna R. N. Oliveira Marcos G. E. da Luz |
| author_facet | Daniel F. Orsini Luna R. N. Oliveira Marcos G. E. da Luz |
| author_sort | Daniel F. Orsini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Entropy |
| description | The identification and physical interpretation of arbitrary quantum correlations are not always effortless. Two features that can significantly influence the dispersion of the joint observable outcomes in a quantum bipartite system composed of systems I and II are: (a) All possible pairs of observables describing the composite are equally probable upon measurement, and (b) The absence of concurrence (positive reinforcement) between any of the observables within a particular system; implying that their associated operators do not commute. The so-called EPR states are known to observe (a). Here, we demonstrate in very general (but straightforward) terms that they also satisfy condition (b), a relevant technical fact often overlooked. As an illustration, we work out in detail the three-level systems, i.e., qutrits. Furthermore, given the special characteristics of EPR states (such as maximal entanglement, among others), one might intuitively expect the CHSH correlation, computed exclusively for the observables of qubit EPR states, to yield values greater than two, thereby violating Bell’s inequality. We show such a prediction does not hold true. In fact, the combined properties of (a) and (b) lead to a more limited range of values for the CHSH measure, not surpassing the nonlocality threshold of two. The present constitutes an instructive example of the subtleties of quantum correlations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5cb9dc124cc346e6896aa262f906dfd2 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1099-4300 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-5cb9dc124cc346e6896aa262f906dfd22025-08-20T00:03:54ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002024-05-0126647610.3390/e26060476Correlations in the EPR State ObservablesDaniel F. Orsini0Luna R. N. Oliveira1Marcos G. E. da Luz2Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, BrazilDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, BrazilDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, BrazilThe identification and physical interpretation of arbitrary quantum correlations are not always effortless. Two features that can significantly influence the dispersion of the joint observable outcomes in a quantum bipartite system composed of systems I and II are: (a) All possible pairs of observables describing the composite are equally probable upon measurement, and (b) The absence of concurrence (positive reinforcement) between any of the observables within a particular system; implying that their associated operators do not commute. The so-called EPR states are known to observe (a). Here, we demonstrate in very general (but straightforward) terms that they also satisfy condition (b), a relevant technical fact often overlooked. As an illustration, we work out in detail the three-level systems, i.e., qutrits. Furthermore, given the special characteristics of EPR states (such as maximal entanglement, among others), one might intuitively expect the CHSH correlation, computed exclusively for the observables of qubit EPR states, to yield values greater than two, thereby violating Bell’s inequality. We show such a prediction does not hold true. In fact, the combined properties of (a) and (b) lead to a more limited range of values for the CHSH measure, not surpassing the nonlocality threshold of two. The present constitutes an instructive example of the subtleties of quantum correlations.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/6/476quantum correlationsEPR statesentanglementBell’s inequalitiesCHSH correlation |
| spellingShingle | Daniel F. Orsini Luna R. N. Oliveira Marcos G. E. da Luz Correlations in the EPR State Observables quantum correlations EPR states entanglement Bell’s inequalities CHSH correlation |
| title | Correlations in the EPR State Observables |
| title_full | Correlations in the EPR State Observables |
| title_fullStr | Correlations in the EPR State Observables |
| title_full_unstemmed | Correlations in the EPR State Observables |
| title_short | Correlations in the EPR State Observables |
| title_sort | correlations in the epr state observables |
| topic | quantum correlations EPR states entanglement Bell’s inequalities CHSH correlation |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/6/476 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielforsini correlationsintheeprstateobservables AT lunarnoliveira correlationsintheeprstateobservables AT marcosgedaluz correlationsintheeprstateobservables |
