Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
ABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methods Both...
| Published in: | Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70076 |
| _version_ | 1849665874336677888 |
|---|---|
| author | Mazin Merdad Nada Al Taylouni |
| author_facet | Mazin Merdad Nada Al Taylouni |
| author_sort | Mazin Merdad |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology |
| description | ABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methods Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau2, I2, and Cochran's Q test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with p < 0.05 as significant. Results The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post‐radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease‐free survival and recurrence‐free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases. Conclusion The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node‐negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long‐term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5cf078d2f97e4c248a6efaee8e019489 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2378-8038 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-5cf078d2f97e4c248a6efaee8e0194892025-08-20T02:20:22ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382025-04-01102n/an/a10.1002/lio2.70076Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?Mazin Merdad0Nada Al Taylouni1Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi ArabiaMedical Resident King Abdullah Medical Complex Jeddah Saudi ArabiaABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methods Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau2, I2, and Cochran's Q test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with p < 0.05 as significant. Results The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post‐radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease‐free survival and recurrence‐free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases. Conclusion The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node‐negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long‐term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70076elective necklaryngectomyneck dissectionoccult nodal |
| spellingShingle | Mazin Merdad Nada Al Taylouni Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated? elective neck laryngectomy neck dissection occult nodal |
| title | Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated? |
| title_full | Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated? |
| title_fullStr | Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated? |
| title_short | Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated? |
| title_sort | salvage laryngectomy in clinically n0 patients is elective neck dissection indicated |
| topic | elective neck laryngectomy neck dissection occult nodal |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70076 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mazinmerdad salvagelaryngectomyinclinicallyn0patientsiselectiveneckdissectionindicated AT nadaaltaylouni salvagelaryngectomyinclinicallyn0patientsiselectiveneckdissectionindicated |
