Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?

ABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methods Both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Main Authors: Mazin Merdad, Nada Al Taylouni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70076
_version_ 1849665874336677888
author Mazin Merdad
Nada Al Taylouni
author_facet Mazin Merdad
Nada Al Taylouni
author_sort Mazin Merdad
collection DOAJ
container_title Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
description ABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methods Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau2, I2, and Cochran's Q test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with p < 0.05 as significant. Results The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post‐radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease‐free survival and recurrence‐free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases. Conclusion The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node‐negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long‐term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.
format Article
id doaj-art-5cf078d2f97e4c248a6efaee8e019489
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2378-8038
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-5cf078d2f97e4c248a6efaee8e0194892025-08-20T02:20:22ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382025-04-01102n/an/a10.1002/lio2.70076Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?Mazin Merdad0Nada Al Taylouni1Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi ArabiaMedical Resident King Abdullah Medical Complex Jeddah Saudi ArabiaABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks. Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methods Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau2, I2, and Cochran's Q test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with p < 0.05 as significant. Results The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post‐radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease‐free survival and recurrence‐free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases. Conclusion The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node‐negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long‐term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70076elective necklaryngectomyneck dissectionoccult nodal
spellingShingle Mazin Merdad
Nada Al Taylouni
Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
elective neck
laryngectomy
neck dissection
occult nodal
title Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
title_full Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
title_fullStr Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
title_full_unstemmed Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
title_short Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?
title_sort salvage laryngectomy in clinically n0 patients is elective neck dissection indicated
topic elective neck
laryngectomy
neck dissection
occult nodal
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70076
work_keys_str_mv AT mazinmerdad salvagelaryngectomyinclinicallyn0patientsiselectiveneckdissectionindicated
AT nadaaltaylouni salvagelaryngectomyinclinicallyn0patientsiselectiveneckdissectionindicated