Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy

Introduction. The majority of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy, apart from loss of sexual function, note a decrease in penis size which negatively affects their self-esteem. Penile rehabilitation is a set of measures aimed at recovery of sexual function to improve the quality of life.Objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Андрология и генитальная хирургия
Main Authors: A. E. Osadchinskii, S. V. Kotov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2022-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/565
_version_ 1851943316309934080
author A. E. Osadchinskii
S. V. Kotov
author_facet A. E. Osadchinskii
S. V. Kotov
author_sort A. E. Osadchinskii
collection DOAJ
container_title Андрология и генитальная хирургия
description Introduction. The majority of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy, apart from loss of sexual function, note a decrease in penis size which negatively affects their self-esteem. Penile rehabilitation is a set of measures aimed at recovery of sexual function to improve the quality of life.Objective. To analyze various options for penile rehabilitation in order to choose a method for preventing penis size reduction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.Materials and methods. Patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (n = 83) at status flaccid and status erect were measured: length, circumference of the base, body and glans penis (mm) at different periods of penile rehabilitation. As a control, the tumescence coefficient was determined using pharmacodopplerography. All results were evaluated before, at the 6th and 12th months after radical prostatectomy.Results. Depending on the type of restoration of erectile function, the patients were divided into several groups: group 1 – men without penile rehabilitation; group 2 – patients treated with phosphodiesterase inhibitors of type 5; group 3 – using vacuum erection device (VED) and group 4 – taking combined penile rehabilitation. Medians of tumescence coefficient in group 1 on the 6th and 12th months was 2.7 (2.4; 3.1) and 2.6 (1.9; 2.9), in group 2 – 2.8 (2.2; 3.5) and 2.9 (2.2; 3.5), in group 3 – 2.7 (2.3; 3.3) and 2.8 (2.3; 3.3), in group 4 – 3.0 (2.2; 3.2) and 3.1 (2.1; 3.2), respectively (p <0.05).Conclusion. The determination of the tumescence coefficient in dynamics showed more significant results throughout the entire observation period. Combined penile rehabilitation is an effective method of restoring erectile function and also allows to maintain the size of the penis at all follow-up periods.
format Article
id doaj-art-5e2f7599ecbd4c05bb1eb08a35e4ea68
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2070-9781
language Russian
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-5e2f7599ecbd4c05bb1eb08a35e4ea682025-08-19T21:49:32ZrusABV-pressАндрология и генитальная хирургия2070-97812022-06-01232546010.17650/2070-9781-2022-23-2-54-60460Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomyA. E. Osadchinskii0S. V. Kotov1Bashkir State Medical UniversityBashkir State Medical University; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaIntroduction. The majority of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy, apart from loss of sexual function, note a decrease in penis size which negatively affects their self-esteem. Penile rehabilitation is a set of measures aimed at recovery of sexual function to improve the quality of life.Objective. To analyze various options for penile rehabilitation in order to choose a method for preventing penis size reduction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.Materials and methods. Patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (n = 83) at status flaccid and status erect were measured: length, circumference of the base, body and glans penis (mm) at different periods of penile rehabilitation. As a control, the tumescence coefficient was determined using pharmacodopplerography. All results were evaluated before, at the 6th and 12th months after radical prostatectomy.Results. Depending on the type of restoration of erectile function, the patients were divided into several groups: group 1 – men without penile rehabilitation; group 2 – patients treated with phosphodiesterase inhibitors of type 5; group 3 – using vacuum erection device (VED) and group 4 – taking combined penile rehabilitation. Medians of tumescence coefficient in group 1 on the 6th and 12th months was 2.7 (2.4; 3.1) and 2.6 (1.9; 2.9), in group 2 – 2.8 (2.2; 3.5) and 2.9 (2.2; 3.5), in group 3 – 2.7 (2.3; 3.3) and 2.8 (2.3; 3.3), in group 4 – 3.0 (2.2; 3.2) and 3.1 (2.1; 3.2), respectively (p <0.05).Conclusion. The determination of the tumescence coefficient in dynamics showed more significant results throughout the entire observation period. Combined penile rehabilitation is an effective method of restoring erectile function and also allows to maintain the size of the penis at all follow-up periods.https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/565radical prostatectomypenile rehabilitationerectile dysfunction
spellingShingle A. E. Osadchinskii
S. V. Kotov
Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
radical prostatectomy
penile rehabilitation
erectile dysfunction
title Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
title_full Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
title_short Loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
title_sort loss of penile length following radical prostatectomy
topic radical prostatectomy
penile rehabilitation
erectile dysfunction
url https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/565
work_keys_str_mv AT aeosadchinskii lossofpenilelengthfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT svkotov lossofpenilelengthfollowingradicalprostatectomy