Aesthetic Ethics without Evil. Aischron in Greek Popular Ethics

In the paper I consider the Greek term aischron as a candidate for a moral concept of evil, focusing on popular rather than philosophical Greek ethical thought. I distinguish between a wide and a narrow concept of evil, focusing in the enquiry on the latter. A narrow concept of evil is limited to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Polish Journal of Aesthetics
Main Author: Michał Bizoń
Format: Article
Language:German
Published: Institute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian University 2020-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/documents/138618288/145031258/pja-56-1-bizon2.pdf/f0ddb8a9-8006-4c1b-ba38-b3ef31490680
Description
Summary:In the paper I consider the Greek term aischron as a candidate for a moral concept of evil, focusing on popular rather than philosophical Greek ethical thought. I distinguish between a wide and a narrow concept of evil, focusing in the enquiry on the latter. A narrow concept of evil is limited to a moral meaning, referring to moral agents and actions. In this use evil represents the strongest negative evaluative term of moral agents and actions. I begin the analysis of aischron with a scrutiny of its positive counterpart, kalon. I synthetically discuss the ongoing discussion regarding its meanings. I then turn to the term aischron and its cognates and conclude that its meanings have a similar, albeit not identical, range to kalon. In both cases the semantic field of these terms include a functional, aesthetic, and ethical component. I further argue that these three components are interconnected which suggests that the various meanings of kalon and aischron are not homonymous. On this basis I argue that the functional and aesthetic components present fundamental difficulties for reading aischron as denoting moral evil.
ISSN:2544-8242
2544-8242