Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality

Pulse measurements made using wearable devices can aid the monitoring of human physiological condition. Accurate estimation of waveforms is often difficult for nonexperts; motion artifacts may occur during tonometry measurements when the skin–sensor contact pressure is insufficient. An alternative a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors
Main Authors: Te Ouyoung, Wan-Ling Weng, Ting-Yu Hu, Chia-Chien Lee, Li-Wei Wu, Hsin Hsiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/22/8607
_version_ 1851841739381276672
author Te Ouyoung
Wan-Ling Weng
Ting-Yu Hu
Chia-Chien Lee
Li-Wei Wu
Hsin Hsiu
author_facet Te Ouyoung
Wan-Ling Weng
Ting-Yu Hu
Chia-Chien Lee
Li-Wei Wu
Hsin Hsiu
author_sort Te Ouyoung
collection DOAJ
container_title Sensors
description Pulse measurements made using wearable devices can aid the monitoring of human physiological condition. Accurate estimation of waveforms is often difficult for nonexperts; motion artifacts may occur during tonometry measurements when the skin–sensor contact pressure is insufficient. An alternative approach is to extract only high-quality pulses for use in index calculations. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using machine-learning analysis in discriminating between high-quality and low-quality pulse waveforms induced by applying different contact pressures. Radial blood pressure waveform (BPW) signals were measured noninvasively in healthy young subjects using a strain-gauge transducer. One-minute-long trains of pulse data were measured when applying the appropriate contact pressure (67.80 ± 1.55 mmHg) and a higher contact pressure (151.80 ± 3.19 mmHg). Eight machine-learning algorithms were employed to evaluate the following 40 harmonic pulse indices: amplitude proportions and their coefficients of variation and phase angles and their standard deviations. Significant differences were noted in BPW indices between applying appropriate and higher skin–surface contact pressures. The present appropriate contact pressure could not only provide a suitable holding force for the wearable device but also helped to maintain the physiological stability of the underlying tissues. Machine-learning analysis provides an effective method for distinguishing between the high-quality and low-quality pulses with excellent discrimination performance (leave-one-subject-out test: random-forest AUC = 0.96). This approach will aid the development of an automatic screening method for waveform quality and thereby improve the noninvasive acquisition reliability. Other possible interfering factors in practical applications can also be systematically studied using a similar procedure.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ea59e2efce241d39657f4aa5b8fadaa
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1424-8220
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-5ea59e2efce241d39657f4aa5b8fadaa2025-08-19T22:28:09ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-11-012222860710.3390/s22228607Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform QualityTe Ouyoung0Wan-Ling Weng1Ting-Yu Hu2Chia-Chien Lee3Li-Wei Wu4Hsin Hsiu5Division of Family Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, TaiwanDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, TaiwanPulse measurements made using wearable devices can aid the monitoring of human physiological condition. Accurate estimation of waveforms is often difficult for nonexperts; motion artifacts may occur during tonometry measurements when the skin–sensor contact pressure is insufficient. An alternative approach is to extract only high-quality pulses for use in index calculations. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using machine-learning analysis in discriminating between high-quality and low-quality pulse waveforms induced by applying different contact pressures. Radial blood pressure waveform (BPW) signals were measured noninvasively in healthy young subjects using a strain-gauge transducer. One-minute-long trains of pulse data were measured when applying the appropriate contact pressure (67.80 ± 1.55 mmHg) and a higher contact pressure (151.80 ± 3.19 mmHg). Eight machine-learning algorithms were employed to evaluate the following 40 harmonic pulse indices: amplitude proportions and their coefficients of variation and phase angles and their standard deviations. Significant differences were noted in BPW indices between applying appropriate and higher skin–surface contact pressures. The present appropriate contact pressure could not only provide a suitable holding force for the wearable device but also helped to maintain the physiological stability of the underlying tissues. Machine-learning analysis provides an effective method for distinguishing between the high-quality and low-quality pulses with excellent discrimination performance (leave-one-subject-out test: random-forest AUC = 0.96). This approach will aid the development of an automatic screening method for waveform quality and thereby improve the noninvasive acquisition reliability. Other possible interfering factors in practical applications can also be systematically studied using a similar procedure.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/22/8607waveform qualitypulsespectral analysismachine learningcontacting pressure
spellingShingle Te Ouyoung
Wan-Ling Weng
Ting-Yu Hu
Chia-Chien Lee
Li-Wei Wu
Hsin Hsiu
Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
waveform quality
pulse
spectral analysis
machine learning
contacting pressure
title Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
title_full Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
title_fullStr Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
title_full_unstemmed Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
title_short Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
title_sort machine learning classification of pulse waveform quality
topic waveform quality
pulse
spectral analysis
machine learning
contacting pressure
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/22/8607
work_keys_str_mv AT teouyoung machinelearningclassificationofpulsewaveformquality
AT wanlingweng machinelearningclassificationofpulsewaveformquality
AT tingyuhu machinelearningclassificationofpulsewaveformquality
AT chiachienlee machinelearningclassificationofpulsewaveformquality
AT liweiwu machinelearningclassificationofpulsewaveformquality
AT hsinhsiu machinelearningclassificationofpulsewaveformquality