Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models

Despite many efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment resistance, there is still no reliable method for selecting patients who could benefit from standard pharmacological treatment. Here, four PDAC patient‐derived xenografts (PDAC‐PDXs) with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular Oncology
Main Authors: Alessia Anastasia, Laura Formenti, Paola Ostano, Lucia Minoli, Andrea Resovi, Lavinia Morosi, Claudia Fioravanti, Edoardo Micotti, Cristina Matteo, Eugenio Scanziani, Giovanna Chiorino, Raffaella Giavazzi, Carmen Ghilardi, Dorina Belotti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13816
_version_ 1849689631807766528
author Alessia Anastasia
Laura Formenti
Paola Ostano
Lucia Minoli
Andrea Resovi
Lavinia Morosi
Claudia Fioravanti
Edoardo Micotti
Cristina Matteo
Eugenio Scanziani
Giovanna Chiorino
Raffaella Giavazzi
Carmen Ghilardi
Dorina Belotti
author_facet Alessia Anastasia
Laura Formenti
Paola Ostano
Lucia Minoli
Andrea Resovi
Lavinia Morosi
Claudia Fioravanti
Edoardo Micotti
Cristina Matteo
Eugenio Scanziani
Giovanna Chiorino
Raffaella Giavazzi
Carmen Ghilardi
Dorina Belotti
author_sort Alessia Anastasia
collection DOAJ
container_title Molecular Oncology
description Despite many efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment resistance, there is still no reliable method for selecting patients who could benefit from standard pharmacological treatment. Here, four PDAC patient‐derived xenografts (PDAC‐PDXs) with different responses to gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel) were studied to dissect the contribution of both tumor and host microenvironment to treatment response. PDAC‐PDXs transplanted into the pancreas of immunodeficient mice retained the main genetic and histopathological characteristics of the original human tumors, including invasiveness and desmoplastic reaction. Response to chemotherapy was associated with a specific 294 stroma gene signature and was not due to the intrinsic responsiveness of tumor cells or differences in drug delivery. Human dataset analysis validated the expression of the 294 stroma gene signature in PDAC clinical samples, confirming PDAC‐PDXs as a useful tool to study the biology of tumor–host interactions and to test drug efficacy. In summary, we identified a stroma gene signature that differentiates PDAC‐PDXs that are responsive to gemcitabine plus Nab‐paclitaxel treatment from those that are not, confirming the active role of the tumor microenvironment in the drug response.
format Article
id doaj-art-5f21d3a2e9054eae80cb607e765cdcb1
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1574-7891
1878-0261
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-5f21d3a2e9054eae80cb607e765cdcb12025-08-20T02:08:56ZengWileyMolecular Oncology1574-78911878-02612025-04-011941075109110.1002/1878-0261.13816Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft modelsAlessia Anastasia0Laura Formenti1Paola Ostano2Lucia Minoli3Andrea Resovi4Lavinia Morosi5Claudia Fioravanti6Edoardo Micotti7Cristina Matteo8Eugenio Scanziani9Giovanna Chiorino10Raffaella Giavazzi11Carmen Ghilardi12Dorina Belotti13Department of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyLab of Cancer Genomics Fondazione “Edo ed Elvo Tempia” Biella ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Neuroscience Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyMouse and Animal Pathology Laboratory (MAPLab), Fondazione Unimi Milan ItalyLab of Cancer Genomics Fondazione “Edo ed Elvo Tempia” Biella ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDepartment of Oncology Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Bergamo and Milan ItalyDespite many efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment resistance, there is still no reliable method for selecting patients who could benefit from standard pharmacological treatment. Here, four PDAC patient‐derived xenografts (PDAC‐PDXs) with different responses to gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel) were studied to dissect the contribution of both tumor and host microenvironment to treatment response. PDAC‐PDXs transplanted into the pancreas of immunodeficient mice retained the main genetic and histopathological characteristics of the original human tumors, including invasiveness and desmoplastic reaction. Response to chemotherapy was associated with a specific 294 stroma gene signature and was not due to the intrinsic responsiveness of tumor cells or differences in drug delivery. Human dataset analysis validated the expression of the 294 stroma gene signature in PDAC clinical samples, confirming PDAC‐PDXs as a useful tool to study the biology of tumor–host interactions and to test drug efficacy. In summary, we identified a stroma gene signature that differentiates PDAC‐PDXs that are responsive to gemcitabine plus Nab‐paclitaxel treatment from those that are not, confirming the active role of the tumor microenvironment in the drug response.https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13816pancreatic cancerpatient‐derived xenograftsstroma signaturetreatment response
spellingShingle Alessia Anastasia
Laura Formenti
Paola Ostano
Lucia Minoli
Andrea Resovi
Lavinia Morosi
Claudia Fioravanti
Edoardo Micotti
Cristina Matteo
Eugenio Scanziani
Giovanna Chiorino
Raffaella Giavazzi
Carmen Ghilardi
Dorina Belotti
Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models
pancreatic cancer
patient‐derived xenografts
stroma signature
treatment response
title Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models
title_full Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models
title_fullStr Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models
title_full_unstemmed Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models
title_short Stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient‐derived xenograft models
title_sort stroma gene signature predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient derived xenograft models
topic pancreatic cancer
patient‐derived xenografts
stroma signature
treatment response
url https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13816
work_keys_str_mv AT alessiaanastasia stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT lauraformenti stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT paolaostano stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT luciaminoli stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT andrearesovi stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT laviniamorosi stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT claudiafioravanti stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT edoardomicotti stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT cristinamatteo stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT eugenioscanziani stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT giovannachiorino stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT raffaellagiavazzi stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT carmenghilardi stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels
AT dorinabelotti stromagenesignaturepredictsresponsivenesstochemotherapyinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapatientderivedxenograftmodels