Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents

Natural gas pipelines are key energy infrastructures worldwide. Pipeline incidents frequently result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that remain unaccounted for in carbon inventories. This study analyzed natural gas pipeline incidents in the United States, finding that such incidents released 14.7...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nexus
Main Authors: Hongfang Lu, Kaihui Song, Yuli Shan, Y. Frank Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-12-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950160125000440
_version_ 1848768224475217920
author Hongfang Lu
Kaihui Song
Yuli Shan
Y. Frank Cheng
author_facet Hongfang Lu
Kaihui Song
Yuli Shan
Y. Frank Cheng
author_sort Hongfang Lu
collection DOAJ
container_title Nexus
description Natural gas pipelines are key energy infrastructures worldwide. Pipeline incidents frequently result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that remain unaccounted for in carbon inventories. This study analyzed natural gas pipeline incidents in the United States, finding that such incidents released 14.71–18.20 million tCO2e during 2010–2021, representing an additional 2.67%–3.30% of total emissions. Presently, the US Environmental Protection Agency inventories record emissions during routine normal operations while excluding the incident-based releases. Regional patterns show that US Gulf Coast and South Central states have substantially higher emission risks than other regions. Pipeline age analysis reveals a non-monotonic risk pattern, with dual peaks driven by distinct failure mechanisms. Early-life pipelines (0–10 years) have elevated risks resulting from equipment failures, while long-life serviced pipelines experience degradation-related risks. The top 10% of incidents generate 57% of total emissions. Targeting the high-emitting incidents could reduce cumulative emissions by over 40%, highlighting substantial mitigation opportunities through improved monitoring and management strategy. Broader context: Natural gas pipelines represent critical energy infrastructure spanning 500,000 km across the United States, yet their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions through operational incidents remains poorly quantified and often overlooked in climate mitigation strategies. As natural gas continues to serve as a bridge fuel in the energy transition, accurately accounting for all emission sources becomes essential for meeting climate commitments and ensuring infrastructure resilience. This research addresses a critical gap not in conventional accounting but in quantifying emission risks and emission factors from pipeline incidents. While routine operational emissions receive considerable attention, incident-related emissions can be large in scale despite being less frequent. Our findings show that US pipeline incidents emit as much as 4 to 5 coal-fired power plants annually, yet they are excluded from official inventories. The identification of regional disparities and age-related risks provides actionable insights for pipeline safety and emissions mitigation. This work supports data-driven policy, guides infrastructure investments, and underscores the need to incorporate incident emissions into future climate strategies.
format Article
id doaj-art-65d9a7a689da4382bbcfdd3fdf75cd2d
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2950-1601
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-65d9a7a689da4382bbcfdd3fdf75cd2d2025-10-04T04:17:09ZengElsevierNexus2950-16012025-12-012410009710.1016/j.ynexs.2025.100097Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidentsHongfang Lu0Kaihui Song1Yuli Shan2Y. Frank Cheng3State Key Laboratory of Advanced Marine Materials, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China; School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, ChinaEnergy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94270, USASchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKState Key Laboratory of Advanced Marine Materials, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; Corresponding authorNatural gas pipelines are key energy infrastructures worldwide. Pipeline incidents frequently result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that remain unaccounted for in carbon inventories. This study analyzed natural gas pipeline incidents in the United States, finding that such incidents released 14.71–18.20 million tCO2e during 2010–2021, representing an additional 2.67%–3.30% of total emissions. Presently, the US Environmental Protection Agency inventories record emissions during routine normal operations while excluding the incident-based releases. Regional patterns show that US Gulf Coast and South Central states have substantially higher emission risks than other regions. Pipeline age analysis reveals a non-monotonic risk pattern, with dual peaks driven by distinct failure mechanisms. Early-life pipelines (0–10 years) have elevated risks resulting from equipment failures, while long-life serviced pipelines experience degradation-related risks. The top 10% of incidents generate 57% of total emissions. Targeting the high-emitting incidents could reduce cumulative emissions by over 40%, highlighting substantial mitigation opportunities through improved monitoring and management strategy. Broader context: Natural gas pipelines represent critical energy infrastructure spanning 500,000 km across the United States, yet their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions through operational incidents remains poorly quantified and often overlooked in climate mitigation strategies. As natural gas continues to serve as a bridge fuel in the energy transition, accurately accounting for all emission sources becomes essential for meeting climate commitments and ensuring infrastructure resilience. This research addresses a critical gap not in conventional accounting but in quantifying emission risks and emission factors from pipeline incidents. While routine operational emissions receive considerable attention, incident-related emissions can be large in scale despite being less frequent. Our findings show that US pipeline incidents emit as much as 4 to 5 coal-fired power plants annually, yet they are excluded from official inventories. The identification of regional disparities and age-related risks provides actionable insights for pipeline safety and emissions mitigation. This work supports data-driven policy, guides infrastructure investments, and underscores the need to incorporate incident emissions into future climate strategies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950160125000440natural gas pipelinepipeline incidentgreenhouse gas emissionspipeline ageemission factor
spellingShingle Hongfang Lu
Kaihui Song
Yuli Shan
Y. Frank Cheng
Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
natural gas pipeline
pipeline incident
greenhouse gas emissions
pipeline age
emission factor
title Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
title_full Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
title_fullStr Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
title_short Quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
title_sort quantifying greenhouse gas emission risks from natural gas pipeline incidents
topic natural gas pipeline
pipeline incident
greenhouse gas emissions
pipeline age
emission factor
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950160125000440
work_keys_str_mv AT hongfanglu quantifyinggreenhousegasemissionrisksfromnaturalgaspipelineincidents
AT kaihuisong quantifyinggreenhousegasemissionrisksfromnaturalgaspipelineincidents
AT yulishan quantifyinggreenhousegasemissionrisksfromnaturalgaspipelineincidents
AT yfrankcheng quantifyinggreenhousegasemissionrisksfromnaturalgaspipelineincidents