Deciphering the cardioprotective effects of statins in anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• 出版年: American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
• 主要な著者: Mubashar Karamat, Bilal Hussain, Munis Mahboob Ahmed, Mohammad Hamza, Junaid Mir, Ayedh Alamri, Aimen Shafiq, Yasar Sattar, Muhammad Zia Khan, Harshith Thyagaturu, Karthik Gonuguntla, Birjesh D Patel
• フォーマット: 論文
• 言語: 英語
• 出版事項: Elsevier 2024-12-01
• 主題: Statins; Cancer; Anthracyclines; Cardiac Dysfunction; Chemotherapy; Heart Failure
• オンライン･アクセス: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724002423

Background: Cancer induced chronic inflammation and cancer drugs effects on the vascular system can lead to rapidly progressing atherosclerotic burden. Statins drugs are known to reduce atherosclerotic plaque burden and inflammation. We studied outcomes of statins for anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction (ARCD). Methods: We conducted an online systematic search on PubMed and Embase to identify studies assessing statins' role in alleviating ARCD. We selected 9 studies that had patients with ARCD and use of statins. We primarily focused on outcomes including incidence of heart failure (HF), mean changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random effect model in R-statistics. Results: Among 9 studies with a total of 2784 patients we noticed a significant reduction in the incidence of HF among patients administered statins, with an OR of 0.52 (95 % CI 0.37-0.74, p < 0.0003), indicating a substantial protective effect. However, the mean changes in EF, LVEDV, and LVESV from baseline, represented by Hedges's g of 1.09 (95 % CI -0.40 to 2.57, p = 0.15), 0.91 (95 % CI -1.69 to 3.51, p = 0.47), and 1.32 (95 % CI -2.30 to 4.94, p = 0.49) respectively, were not statistically significant. (Figure 1). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis confirms statins' effectiveness in reducing risk of ARCD. However, their influence on EF, LVEDV, and LVESV remains uncertain, warranting further study.