Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis
Mean-variance optimization often leads to unreasonable asset allocations. This problem has forced scholars and practitioners alike to introduce portfolio constraints. The scope of our study is to verify which type of constraint is more suitable for achieving efficient performance. We have applied th...
| Published in: | International Journal of Financial Studies |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-01-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/9 |
| _version_ | 1850118844134195200 |
|---|---|
| author | Guido Abate Tommaso Bonafini Pierpaolo Ferrari |
| author_facet | Guido Abate Tommaso Bonafini Pierpaolo Ferrari |
| author_sort | Guido Abate |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | International Journal of Financial Studies |
| description | Mean-variance optimization often leads to unreasonable asset allocations. This problem has forced scholars and practitioners alike to introduce portfolio constraints. The scope of our study is to verify which type of constraint is more suitable for achieving efficient performance. We have applied the main techniques developed by the financial community, including classical weight, flexible, norm-based, variance-based, tracking error volatility, and beta constraints. We employed panel data on the monthly returns of the sector indices forming the MSCI All Country World Index from January 1995 to December 2020. The assessment of each strategy was based on out-of-sample performance, measured using a rolling window method with annual rebalancing. We observed that the best strategies are those subject to constraints derived from the equal-weighted model. If the goal is the best compromise between absolute return, efficiency, total risk, economic sustainability, diversification, and ease of implementation, the best solution is a portfolio subject to no short selling and bound either to the equal weighting or to TEV limits. Overall, we found that constrained optimization models represent an efficient alternative to classic investment strategies that provide substantial advantages to investors. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-68b2ffaf84aa489697ef8f58c19075ff |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2227-7072 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-68b2ffaf84aa489697ef8f58c19075ff2025-08-19T23:56:56ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Financial Studies2227-70722022-01-01101910.3390/ijfs10010009Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical AnalysisGuido Abate0Tommaso Bonafini1Pierpaolo Ferrari2Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, C.da S. Chiara, 50, 25122 Brescia, ItalyDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, C.da S. Chiara, 50, 25122 Brescia, ItalyDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, C.da S. Chiara, 50, 25122 Brescia, ItalyMean-variance optimization often leads to unreasonable asset allocations. This problem has forced scholars and practitioners alike to introduce portfolio constraints. The scope of our study is to verify which type of constraint is more suitable for achieving efficient performance. We have applied the main techniques developed by the financial community, including classical weight, flexible, norm-based, variance-based, tracking error volatility, and beta constraints. We employed panel data on the monthly returns of the sector indices forming the MSCI All Country World Index from January 1995 to December 2020. The assessment of each strategy was based on out-of-sample performance, measured using a rolling window method with annual rebalancing. We observed that the best strategies are those subject to constraints derived from the equal-weighted model. If the goal is the best compromise between absolute return, efficiency, total risk, economic sustainability, diversification, and ease of implementation, the best solution is a portfolio subject to no short selling and bound either to the equal weighting or to TEV limits. Overall, we found that constrained optimization models represent an efficient alternative to classic investment strategies that provide substantial advantages to investors.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/9mean variance optimizationportfolio constraintsweight constraintsvolatility constraintstracking error constraintbeta constraint |
| spellingShingle | Guido Abate Tommaso Bonafini Pierpaolo Ferrari Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis mean variance optimization portfolio constraints weight constraints volatility constraints tracking error constraint beta constraint |
| title | Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis |
| title_full | Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis |
| title_short | Portfolio Constraints: An Empirical Analysis |
| title_sort | portfolio constraints an empirical analysis |
| topic | mean variance optimization portfolio constraints weight constraints volatility constraints tracking error constraint beta constraint |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guidoabate portfolioconstraintsanempiricalanalysis AT tommasobonafini portfolioconstraintsanempiricalanalysis AT pierpaoloferrari portfolioconstraintsanempiricalanalysis |
