How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding
Over the last two decades, the application of genomic selection has been extensively studied in various crop species, and it has become a common practice to report prediction accuracies using cross validation. However, genomic prediction accuracies obtained from random cross validation can be strong...
| Published in: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-12-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.592977/full |
| _version_ | 1852822929240227840 |
|---|---|
| author | Christian R. Werner R. Chris Gaynor Gregor Gorjanc John M. Hickey Tobias Kox Amine Abbadi Gunhild Leckband Rod J. Snowdon Andreas Stahl Andreas Stahl |
| author_facet | Christian R. Werner R. Chris Gaynor Gregor Gorjanc John M. Hickey Tobias Kox Amine Abbadi Gunhild Leckband Rod J. Snowdon Andreas Stahl Andreas Stahl |
| author_sort | Christian R. Werner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Frontiers in Plant Science |
| description | Over the last two decades, the application of genomic selection has been extensively studied in various crop species, and it has become a common practice to report prediction accuracies using cross validation. However, genomic prediction accuracies obtained from random cross validation can be strongly inflated due to population or family structure, a characteristic shared by many breeding populations. An understanding of the effect of population and family structure on prediction accuracy is essential for the successful application of genomic selection in plant breeding programs. The objective of this study was to make this effect and its implications for practical breeding programs comprehensible for breeders and scientists with a limited background in quantitative genetics and genomic selection theory. We, therefore, compared genomic prediction accuracies obtained from different random cross validation approaches and within-family prediction in three different prediction scenarios. We used a highly structured population of 940 Brassica napus hybrids coming from 46 testcross families and two subpopulations. Our demonstrations show how genomic prediction accuracies obtained from among-family predictions in random cross validation and within-family predictions capture different measures of prediction accuracy. While among-family prediction accuracy measures prediction accuracy of both the parent average component and the Mendelian sampling term, within-family prediction only measures how accurately the Mendelian sampling term can be predicted. With this paper we aim to foster a critical approach to different measures of genomic prediction accuracy and a careful analysis of values observed in genomic selection experiments and reported in literature. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-68e6be21435f4fb8a2eb6f3c301efc3e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1664-462X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-68e6be21435f4fb8a2eb6f3c301efc3e2025-08-19T20:31:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2020-12-011110.3389/fpls.2020.592977592977How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical BreedingChristian R. Werner0R. Chris Gaynor1Gregor Gorjanc2John M. Hickey3Tobias Kox4Amine Abbadi5Gunhild Leckband6Rod J. Snowdon7Andreas Stahl8Andreas Stahl9The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United KingdomThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United KingdomThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United KingdomThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United KingdomNPZ Innovation GmbH, Holtsee, GermanyNPZ Innovation GmbH, Holtsee, GermanyGerman Seed Alliance GmbH, Hohenlieth, GermanyDepartment of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, GermanyDepartment of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, GermanyJulius Kuehn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Quedlinburg, GermanyOver the last two decades, the application of genomic selection has been extensively studied in various crop species, and it has become a common practice to report prediction accuracies using cross validation. However, genomic prediction accuracies obtained from random cross validation can be strongly inflated due to population or family structure, a characteristic shared by many breeding populations. An understanding of the effect of population and family structure on prediction accuracy is essential for the successful application of genomic selection in plant breeding programs. The objective of this study was to make this effect and its implications for practical breeding programs comprehensible for breeders and scientists with a limited background in quantitative genetics and genomic selection theory. We, therefore, compared genomic prediction accuracies obtained from different random cross validation approaches and within-family prediction in three different prediction scenarios. We used a highly structured population of 940 Brassica napus hybrids coming from 46 testcross families and two subpopulations. Our demonstrations show how genomic prediction accuracies obtained from among-family predictions in random cross validation and within-family predictions capture different measures of prediction accuracy. While among-family prediction accuracy measures prediction accuracy of both the parent average component and the Mendelian sampling term, within-family prediction only measures how accurately the Mendelian sampling term can be predicted. With this paper we aim to foster a critical approach to different measures of genomic prediction accuracy and a careful analysis of values observed in genomic selection experiments and reported in literature.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.592977/fullpredictive breedinggenomic predictionoilseed rapenested association mapping populationstructure |
| spellingShingle | Christian R. Werner R. Chris Gaynor Gregor Gorjanc John M. Hickey Tobias Kox Amine Abbadi Gunhild Leckband Rod J. Snowdon Andreas Stahl Andreas Stahl How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding predictive breeding genomic prediction oilseed rape nested association mapping population structure |
| title | How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding |
| title_full | How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding |
| title_fullStr | How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding |
| title_full_unstemmed | How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding |
| title_short | How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding |
| title_sort | how population structure impacts genomic selection accuracy in cross validation implications for practical breeding |
| topic | predictive breeding genomic prediction oilseed rape nested association mapping population structure |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.592977/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christianrwerner howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT rchrisgaynor howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT gregorgorjanc howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT johnmhickey howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT tobiaskox howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT amineabbadi howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT gunhildleckband howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT rodjsnowdon howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT andreasstahl howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding AT andreasstahl howpopulationstructureimpactsgenomicselectionaccuracyincrossvalidationimplicationsforpracticalbreeding |
