EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable direct interaction between human cognition and external devices by interpreting brain activity via electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, the performance of motor imagery (MI)-based BCIs is often limited by the efficiency and accuracy of EEG...
| Published in: | Brain-Apparatus Communication |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/27706710.2025.2523303 |
| _version_ | 1849443894655188992 |
|---|---|
| author | Jiahao Cheng Peng Chen Yufeng Deng Yi Luo Fengyan Chen Jiwang Ma Fei Wang Fen Xu Sheng Guo X. San Liang Tao Zhang |
| author_facet | Jiahao Cheng Peng Chen Yufeng Deng Yi Luo Fengyan Chen Jiwang Ma Fei Wang Fen Xu Sheng Guo X. San Liang Tao Zhang |
| author_sort | Jiahao Cheng |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Brain-Apparatus Communication |
| description | Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable direct interaction between human cognition and external devices by interpreting brain activity via electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, the performance of motor imagery (MI)-based BCIs is often limited by the efficiency and accuracy of EEG feature extraction methods. Challenges such as class separability, noise resilience, and computational complexity. Aim: This study systematically evaluates various feature extraction methods used in MI-based BCIs, with a specific focus on their performance in binary and multi-class classification tasks. Methods: A literature database from resources like Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, conducting statistical and network meta-analyses. Results: Results highlight a strong preference for hybrid methods for their robustness and versatility. The Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) method remains the most common single method, often integrated into hybrids. The network meta-analysis shows that while wavelet transforms perform well in specific contexts, they struggle with task complexity and variability. Hybrid methods, in contrast, demonstrate superior stability, achieving a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 0.811, making them ideal for high-precision tasks. Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of effective feature extraction, advocating for the benefits of hybrid methods while underscoring the need to further refine traditional approaches. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6afafa56cee042b2a78f9c19d9b095ba |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2770-6710 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-6afafa56cee042b2a78f9c19d9b095ba2025-08-20T03:31:45ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBrain-Apparatus Communication2770-67102025-12-014110.1080/27706710.2025.2523303EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysisJiahao Cheng0Peng Chen1Yufeng Deng2Yi Luo3Fengyan Chen4Jiwang Ma5Fei Wang6Fen Xu7Sheng Guo8X. San Liang9Tao Zhang10The Artificial Inteligence Department, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaMental Health Education Center and School of Science, Xihua University, Chengdu, ChinaMental Health Education Center and School of Science, Xihua University, Chengdu, ChinaMental Health Education Center and School of Science, Xihua University, Chengdu, ChinaMental Health Education Center and School of Science, Xihua University, Chengdu, ChinaThe Artificial Inteligence Department, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaThe Artificial Inteligence Department, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaThe Artificial Inteligence Department, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaMental Health Education Center and School of Science, Xihua University, Chengdu, ChinaThe Artificial Inteligence Department, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaThe Artificial Inteligence Department, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaBackground: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable direct interaction between human cognition and external devices by interpreting brain activity via electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, the performance of motor imagery (MI)-based BCIs is often limited by the efficiency and accuracy of EEG feature extraction methods. Challenges such as class separability, noise resilience, and computational complexity. Aim: This study systematically evaluates various feature extraction methods used in MI-based BCIs, with a specific focus on their performance in binary and multi-class classification tasks. Methods: A literature database from resources like Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, conducting statistical and network meta-analyses. Results: Results highlight a strong preference for hybrid methods for their robustness and versatility. The Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) method remains the most common single method, often integrated into hybrids. The network meta-analysis shows that while wavelet transforms perform well in specific contexts, they struggle with task complexity and variability. Hybrid methods, in contrast, demonstrate superior stability, achieving a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 0.811, making them ideal for high-precision tasks. Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of effective feature extraction, advocating for the benefits of hybrid methods while underscoring the need to further refine traditional approaches.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/27706710.2025.2523303Network meta-analysisbrain-computer interfacemotor imageryfeature extraction methodsclassification |
| spellingShingle | Jiahao Cheng Peng Chen Yufeng Deng Yi Luo Fengyan Chen Jiwang Ma Fei Wang Fen Xu Sheng Guo X. San Liang Tao Zhang EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Network meta-analysis brain-computer interface motor imagery feature extraction methods classification |
| title | EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_full | EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_short | EEG feature extraction methods in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_sort | eeg feature extraction methods in motor imagery based brain computer interfaces a systematic review and network meta analysis |
| topic | Network meta-analysis brain-computer interface motor imagery feature extraction methods classification |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/27706710.2025.2523303 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jiahaocheng eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT pengchen eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yufengdeng eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yiluo eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fengyanchen eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jiwangma eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT feiwang eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fenxu eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT shengguo eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xsanliang eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT taozhang eegfeatureextractionmethodsinmotorimagerybasedbraincomputerinterfacesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |
