A Comparison of Efficacy of Nasal Septal Splints with Clip versus Nasal Packing after Septoplasty

Introduction It has always been a concern of ENT surgeon to prevent post operative complications like nasal bleeding, septal hematoma and septal abscess after septoplasty. Traditionally nasal packing has been done to avoid these complications. Although the nasal pack itself  has been a concern for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Main Authors: Piyush Kant Singh, Preeti Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal 2021-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/314
Description
Summary:Introduction It has always been a concern of ENT surgeon to prevent post operative complications like nasal bleeding, septal hematoma and septal abscess after septoplasty. Traditionally nasal packing has been done to avoid these complications. Although the nasal pack itself  has been a concern for several reasons, packing  apart from causing breathing distress, has resulted in  epiphora, dysphagia, sleep disturbance, post-operative pain, headache, septal infection, septal abscess and even toxic shock syndrome. Materials and Methods This study has compared the efficacy of a newly designed septal splint with clip with nasal packs. This study was done on 60 patients, nasal packing was done in 30 patients and septal splints with clip were applied in 30 patients.  Results Post-operative pain, epiphora, dysphagia, dryness of mouth and sleep disturbance was found to be significantly less in patients with septal splints with clip as compared to those with nasal packing. Conclusion Septal splints with clip is more efficacious alternative to nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty.
ISSN:2395-2407