Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages
Felling and skidding are essential in the timber extraction process. But on the other hand, residual stand damage can’t be avoided. This study aimed to analyze the impact of conventional and improved felling and skidding techniques on residual stands in natural forests. Three observation plots were...
| Published in: | Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bogor Agricultural University
2023-12-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmht/article/view/47622 |
| _version_ | 1850121806092959744 |
|---|---|
| author | Yuniawati Sarah Andini Mutia Herni Ningrum |
| author_facet | Yuniawati Sarah Andini Mutia Herni Ningrum |
| author_sort | Yuniawati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika |
| description |
Felling and skidding are essential in the timber extraction process. But on the other hand, residual stand damage can’t be avoided. This study aimed to analyze the impact of conventional and improved felling and skidding techniques on residual stands in natural forests. Three observation plots were developed to identify the types, numbers, and criteria of residual stand damage due to both techniques. The criteria were categorized as a) minor damage (<25%), b) moderate damage (25–50%), and c) major damage (>50%). It showed that the conventional felling and skidding technique caused damages of 14.92% dominated by tree crown damage and 16.70% dominated by stem wounds, respectively. The residual stand damage due to conventional felling and skidding technique was 31.62% categorized as medium damage. Meanwhile, improved felling and skidding techniques caused damage of 9.89% dominated by broken trees, and 10.27% dominated by stem wounds, respectively. The residual stand damage due to improved felling and skidding technique was 20.16% categorized as minor damage. The improvement techniques can minimize residual stand damage by 36.24%. Therefore, a good understanding of forest concessionaires regarding RIL principles is necessary for achieving sustainable timber harvesting
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7dcd9e77e97c4e6098d3a4d005381a75 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2087-0469 2089-2063 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Bogor Agricultural University |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-7dcd9e77e97c4e6098d3a4d005381a752025-08-19T23:55:59ZengBogor Agricultural UniversityJurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika2087-04692089-20632023-12-0129310.7226/jtfm.29.3.234Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages Yuniawati0Sarah Andini1Mutia Herni Ningrum2Biomass and Bioproduct Research Centre, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of IndonesiaBiomass and Bioproduct Research Centre, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46, Bogor, Indonesia 169111Biomass and Bioproduct Research Centre, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia Felling and skidding are essential in the timber extraction process. But on the other hand, residual stand damage can’t be avoided. This study aimed to analyze the impact of conventional and improved felling and skidding techniques on residual stands in natural forests. Three observation plots were developed to identify the types, numbers, and criteria of residual stand damage due to both techniques. The criteria were categorized as a) minor damage (<25%), b) moderate damage (25–50%), and c) major damage (>50%). It showed that the conventional felling and skidding technique caused damages of 14.92% dominated by tree crown damage and 16.70% dominated by stem wounds, respectively. The residual stand damage due to conventional felling and skidding technique was 31.62% categorized as medium damage. Meanwhile, improved felling and skidding techniques caused damage of 9.89% dominated by broken trees, and 10.27% dominated by stem wounds, respectively. The residual stand damage due to improved felling and skidding technique was 20.16% categorized as minor damage. The improvement techniques can minimize residual stand damage by 36.24%. Therefore, a good understanding of forest concessionaires regarding RIL principles is necessary for achieving sustainable timber harvesting https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmht/article/view/47622fellingnatural forestresidual stand damageskidding |
| spellingShingle | Yuniawati Sarah Andini Mutia Herni Ningrum Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages felling natural forest residual stand damage skidding |
| title | Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages |
| title_full | Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages |
| title_fullStr | Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages |
| title_full_unstemmed | Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages |
| title_short | Application of Conventional and Improved Techniques in Felling and Skidding to Residual Stand Damages |
| title_sort | application of conventional and improved techniques in felling and skidding to residual stand damages |
| topic | felling natural forest residual stand damage skidding |
| url | https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmht/article/view/47622 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yuniawati applicationofconventionalandimprovedtechniquesinfellingandskiddingtoresidualstanddamages AT sarahandini applicationofconventionalandimprovedtechniquesinfellingandskiddingtoresidualstanddamages AT mutiaherniningrum applicationofconventionalandimprovedtechniquesinfellingandskiddingtoresidualstanddamages |
