Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration

Abstract Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identifi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation Science and Practice
Main Authors: Rascha J. M. Nuijten, Todd E. Katzner, Andrew M. Allen, Allert I. Bijleveld, Tjalle Boorsma, Luca Börger, Francesca Cagnacci, Tom Hart, Michelle A. Henley, Richard M. Herren, Eva M. A. Kok, Bronwyn Maree, Bruno Nebe, David Shohami, Susanne Marieke Vogel, Paul Walker, Ignas M. A. Heitkönig, E. J. Milner‐Gulland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12870
_version_ 1852670313169420288
author Rascha J. M. Nuijten
Todd E. Katzner
Andrew M. Allen
Allert I. Bijleveld
Tjalle Boorsma
Luca Börger
Francesca Cagnacci
Tom Hart
Michelle A. Henley
Richard M. Herren
Eva M. A. Kok
Bronwyn Maree
Bruno Nebe
David Shohami
Susanne Marieke Vogel
Paul Walker
Ignas M. A. Heitkönig
E. J. Milner‐Gulland
author_facet Rascha J. M. Nuijten
Todd E. Katzner
Andrew M. Allen
Allert I. Bijleveld
Tjalle Boorsma
Luca Börger
Francesca Cagnacci
Tom Hart
Michelle A. Henley
Richard M. Herren
Eva M. A. Kok
Bronwyn Maree
Bruno Nebe
David Shohami
Susanne Marieke Vogel
Paul Walker
Ignas M. A. Heitkönig
E. J. Milner‐Gulland
author_sort Rascha J. M. Nuijten
collection DOAJ
container_title Conservation Science and Practice
description Abstract Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively.
format Article
id doaj-art-7f39869db59448db85bc277fdfaebcbd
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2578-4854
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-7f39869db59448db85bc277fdfaebcbd2025-08-19T21:33:40ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542023-01-0151n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12870Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaborationRascha J. M. Nuijten0Todd E. Katzner1Andrew M. Allen2Allert I. Bijleveld3Tjalle Boorsma4Luca Börger5Francesca Cagnacci6Tom Hart7Michelle A. Henley8Richard M. Herren9Eva M. A. Kok10Bronwyn Maree11Bruno Nebe12David Shohami13Susanne Marieke Vogel14Paul Walker15Ignas M. A. Heitkönig16E. J. Milner‐Gulland17Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford United KingdomU.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Boise Idaho USADepartment of Animal Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW) Wageningen The NetherlandsDepartment of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The NetherlandsAsociación Civil Armonía Santa Cruz de la Sierra BoliviaDepartment of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UKAnimal Ecology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre Fondazione Edmund Mach San Michele all'Adige ItalyDepartment of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UKApplied Behavioural Ecology and Environmental Research Unit University of South Africa Pretoria South AfricaSea Turtle Conservancy Gainesville Florida USADepartment of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The NetherlandsBirdLife South Africa Johannesburg South AfricaMundulea Nature Reserve Otavi NamibiaMovement Ecology Lab, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Faculty of Science The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem IsraelCenter for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology Aarhus University Aarhus C DenmarkWildtracks Sarteneja BelizeWildlife Ecology and Conservation Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The NetherlandsInterdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford United KingdomAbstract Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12870biodiversity crisisbiologgingGPS trackinginterdisciplinary collaborationthematic analysiswildlife management
spellingShingle Rascha J. M. Nuijten
Todd E. Katzner
Andrew M. Allen
Allert I. Bijleveld
Tjalle Boorsma
Luca Börger
Francesca Cagnacci
Tom Hart
Michelle A. Henley
Richard M. Herren
Eva M. A. Kok
Bronwyn Maree
Bruno Nebe
David Shohami
Susanne Marieke Vogel
Paul Walker
Ignas M. A. Heitkönig
E. J. Milner‐Gulland
Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
biodiversity crisis
biologging
GPS tracking
interdisciplinary collaboration
thematic analysis
wildlife management
title Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_full Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_fullStr Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_full_unstemmed Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_short Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_sort priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
topic biodiversity crisis
biologging
GPS tracking
interdisciplinary collaboration
thematic analysis
wildlife management
url https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12870
work_keys_str_mv AT raschajmnuijten prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT toddekatzner prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT andrewmallen prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT allertibijleveld prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT tjalleboorsma prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT lucaborger prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT francescacagnacci prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT tomhart prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT michelleahenley prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT richardmherren prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT evamakok prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT bronwynmaree prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT brunonebe prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT davidshohami prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT susannemariekevogel prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT paulwalker prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT ignasmaheitkonig prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration
AT ejmilnergulland prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration