Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
Abstract Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identifi...
| Published in: | Conservation Science and Practice |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-01-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12870 |
| _version_ | 1852670313169420288 |
|---|---|
| author | Rascha J. M. Nuijten Todd E. Katzner Andrew M. Allen Allert I. Bijleveld Tjalle Boorsma Luca Börger Francesca Cagnacci Tom Hart Michelle A. Henley Richard M. Herren Eva M. A. Kok Bronwyn Maree Bruno Nebe David Shohami Susanne Marieke Vogel Paul Walker Ignas M. A. Heitkönig E. J. Milner‐Gulland |
| author_facet | Rascha J. M. Nuijten Todd E. Katzner Andrew M. Allen Allert I. Bijleveld Tjalle Boorsma Luca Börger Francesca Cagnacci Tom Hart Michelle A. Henley Richard M. Herren Eva M. A. Kok Bronwyn Maree Bruno Nebe David Shohami Susanne Marieke Vogel Paul Walker Ignas M. A. Heitkönig E. J. Milner‐Gulland |
| author_sort | Rascha J. M. Nuijten |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Conservation Science and Practice |
| description | Abstract Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7f39869db59448db85bc277fdfaebcbd |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2578-4854 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-7f39869db59448db85bc277fdfaebcbd2025-08-19T21:33:40ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542023-01-0151n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12870Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaborationRascha J. M. Nuijten0Todd E. Katzner1Andrew M. Allen2Allert I. Bijleveld3Tjalle Boorsma4Luca Börger5Francesca Cagnacci6Tom Hart7Michelle A. Henley8Richard M. Herren9Eva M. A. Kok10Bronwyn Maree11Bruno Nebe12David Shohami13Susanne Marieke Vogel14Paul Walker15Ignas M. A. Heitkönig16E. J. Milner‐Gulland17Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford United KingdomU.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Boise Idaho USADepartment of Animal Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW) Wageningen The NetherlandsDepartment of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The NetherlandsAsociación Civil Armonía Santa Cruz de la Sierra BoliviaDepartment of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UKAnimal Ecology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre Fondazione Edmund Mach San Michele all'Adige ItalyDepartment of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UKApplied Behavioural Ecology and Environmental Research Unit University of South Africa Pretoria South AfricaSea Turtle Conservancy Gainesville Florida USADepartment of Coastal Systems NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The NetherlandsBirdLife South Africa Johannesburg South AfricaMundulea Nature Reserve Otavi NamibiaMovement Ecology Lab, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Faculty of Science The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem IsraelCenter for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology Aarhus University Aarhus C DenmarkWildtracks Sarteneja BelizeWildlife Ecology and Conservation Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The NetherlandsInterdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford United KingdomAbstract Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12870biodiversity crisisbiologgingGPS trackinginterdisciplinary collaborationthematic analysiswildlife management |
| spellingShingle | Rascha J. M. Nuijten Todd E. Katzner Andrew M. Allen Allert I. Bijleveld Tjalle Boorsma Luca Börger Francesca Cagnacci Tom Hart Michelle A. Henley Richard M. Herren Eva M. A. Kok Bronwyn Maree Bruno Nebe David Shohami Susanne Marieke Vogel Paul Walker Ignas M. A. Heitkönig E. J. Milner‐Gulland Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration biodiversity crisis biologging GPS tracking interdisciplinary collaboration thematic analysis wildlife management |
| title | Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration |
| title_full | Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration |
| title_fullStr | Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration |
| title_full_unstemmed | Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration |
| title_short | Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration |
| title_sort | priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration |
| topic | biodiversity crisis biologging GPS tracking interdisciplinary collaboration thematic analysis wildlife management |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12870 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT raschajmnuijten prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT toddekatzner prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT andrewmallen prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT allertibijleveld prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT tjalleboorsma prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT lucaborger prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT francescacagnacci prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT tomhart prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT michelleahenley prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT richardmherren prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT evamakok prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT bronwynmaree prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT brunonebe prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT davidshohami prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT susannemariekevogel prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT paulwalker prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT ignasmaheitkonig prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration AT ejmilnergulland prioritiesfortranslatinggoodwillbetweenmovementecologistsandconservationpractitionersintoeffectivecollaboration |
