Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use

CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring is important for carbon emission evaluation. Low-cost and medium-precision sensors (LCSs) have become an exploratory direction for CO<sub>2</sub> observation under complex emission conditions in cities. Here, we used a calibration method that improve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors
Main Authors: Qixiang Cai, Pengfei Han, Guang Pan, Chi Xu, Xiaoyu Yang, Honghui Xu, Dongde Ruan, Ning Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/9/2680
_version_ 1850289822494621696
author Qixiang Cai
Pengfei Han
Guang Pan
Chi Xu
Xiaoyu Yang
Honghui Xu
Dongde Ruan
Ning Zeng
author_facet Qixiang Cai
Pengfei Han
Guang Pan
Chi Xu
Xiaoyu Yang
Honghui Xu
Dongde Ruan
Ning Zeng
author_sort Qixiang Cai
collection DOAJ
container_title Sensors
description CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring is important for carbon emission evaluation. Low-cost and medium-precision sensors (LCSs) have become an exploratory direction for CO<sub>2</sub> observation under complex emission conditions in cities. Here, we used a calibration method that improved the accuracy of SenseAir K30 CO<sub>2</sub> sensors from ±30 ppm to 0.7–4.0 ppm for a CO<sub>2</sub>-monitoring instrument named the SENSE-IAP, which has been used in several cities, such as in Beijing, Jinan, Fuzhou, Hangzhou, and Wuhan, in China since 2017. We conducted monthly to yearly synchronous observations using the SENSE-IAP along with reference instruments (Picarro) and standard gas to evaluate the performance of the LCSs for indoor use with relatively stable environments. The results show that the precision and accuracy of the SENSE-IAP compared to the standard gases were rather good in relatively stable indoor environments, with the short-term (daily scale) biases ranging from −0.9 to 0.2 ppm, the root mean square errors (RMSE) ranging from 0.7 to 1.6 ppm, the long-term (monthly scale) bias ranging from −1.6 to 0.5 ppm, and the RMSE ranging from 1.3 to 3.2 ppm. The accuracy of the synchronous observations with Picarro was in the same magnitude, with an RMSE of 2.0–3.0 ppm. According to our evaluation, standard instruments or reliable standard gases can be used as a reference to improve the accuracy of the SENSE-IAP. If calibrated daily using standard gases, the bias of the SENSE-IAP can be maintained within 1.0 ppm. If the standard gases are hard to access frequently, we recommend a calibration frequency of at least three months to maintain an accuracy within 3 ppm.
format Article
id doaj-art-85b414eef1ec4e1e97a35c9210e7e46f
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1424-8220
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-85b414eef1ec4e1e97a35c9210e7e46f2025-08-19T23:35:55ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202024-04-01249268010.3390/s24092680Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor UseQixiang Cai0Pengfei Han1Guang Pan2Chi Xu3Xiaoyu Yang4Honghui Xu5Dongde Ruan6Ning Zeng7State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Extreme Meteorology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, ChinaShandong Jinan Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center, Jinan 250102, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Quality Control in Environmental Monitoring, China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing 100012, ChinaShandong Jinan Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center, Jinan 250102, ChinaZhejiang Lin’an Atmospheric Background National Observation and Research Station, Hangzhou 311300, ChinaZhejiang Hangzhou Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center, Hangzhou 310012, ChinaDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USACO<sub>2</sub> monitoring is important for carbon emission evaluation. Low-cost and medium-precision sensors (LCSs) have become an exploratory direction for CO<sub>2</sub> observation under complex emission conditions in cities. Here, we used a calibration method that improved the accuracy of SenseAir K30 CO<sub>2</sub> sensors from ±30 ppm to 0.7–4.0 ppm for a CO<sub>2</sub>-monitoring instrument named the SENSE-IAP, which has been used in several cities, such as in Beijing, Jinan, Fuzhou, Hangzhou, and Wuhan, in China since 2017. We conducted monthly to yearly synchronous observations using the SENSE-IAP along with reference instruments (Picarro) and standard gas to evaluate the performance of the LCSs for indoor use with relatively stable environments. The results show that the precision and accuracy of the SENSE-IAP compared to the standard gases were rather good in relatively stable indoor environments, with the short-term (daily scale) biases ranging from −0.9 to 0.2 ppm, the root mean square errors (RMSE) ranging from 0.7 to 1.6 ppm, the long-term (monthly scale) bias ranging from −1.6 to 0.5 ppm, and the RMSE ranging from 1.3 to 3.2 ppm. The accuracy of the synchronous observations with Picarro was in the same magnitude, with an RMSE of 2.0–3.0 ppm. According to our evaluation, standard instruments or reliable standard gases can be used as a reference to improve the accuracy of the SENSE-IAP. If calibrated daily using standard gases, the bias of the SENSE-IAP can be maintained within 1.0 ppm. If the standard gases are hard to access frequently, we recommend a calibration frequency of at least three months to maintain an accuracy within 3 ppm.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/9/2680CO<sub>2</sub> monitoringNDIR sensormedium precisionlow-cost sensorevaluation
spellingShingle Qixiang Cai
Pengfei Han
Guang Pan
Chi Xu
Xiaoyu Yang
Honghui Xu
Dongde Ruan
Ning Zeng
Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use
CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring
NDIR sensor
medium precision
low-cost sensor
evaluation
title Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use
title_full Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use
title_fullStr Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use
title_short Evaluation of Low-Cost CO<sub>2</sub> Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use
title_sort evaluation of low cost co sub 2 sub sensors using reference instruments and standard gases for indoor use
topic CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring
NDIR sensor
medium precision
low-cost sensor
evaluation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/9/2680
work_keys_str_mv AT qixiangcai evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT pengfeihan evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT guangpan evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT chixu evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT xiaoyuyang evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT honghuixu evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT dongderuan evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse
AT ningzeng evaluationoflowcostcosub2subsensorsusingreferenceinstrumentsandstandardgasesforindooruse