A Case-Study of Implementation of Improved Strategies for Prevention of Laboratory-acquired Brucellosis
Background: In 2012, the Alaska Section of Epidemiology investigated personnel potentially exposed to a Brucella suis isolate as it transited through three laboratories. Methods: We summarize the first implementation of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013 revised recomm...
| 出版年: | Safety and Health at Work |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , , , , , , , |
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | 英語 |
| 出版事項: |
Elsevier
2015-12-01
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791115000657 |
| 要約: | Background: In 2012, the Alaska Section of Epidemiology investigated personnel potentially exposed to a Brucella suis isolate as it transited through three laboratories.
Methods: We summarize the first implementation of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013 revised recommendations for monitoring such exposures: (1) risk classification; (2) antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis; (3) serologic monitoring; and (4) symptom surveillance.
Results: Over 30 people were assessed for exposure and subsequently monitored for development of illness. No cases of laboratory-associated brucellosis occurred. Changes were made to gaps in laboratory biosafety practices that had been identified in the investigation.
Conclusion: Achieving full compliance for the precise schedule of serologic monitoring was challenging and resource intensive for the laboratory performing testing. More refined exposure assessments could inform decision making for follow-up to maximize likelihood of detecting persons at risk while not overtaxing resources. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2093-7911 |
