Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In recent years, the effectiveness of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration has attracted attention in various cancers, including head and neck cancers. However, individual assessments of the administered chemotherapy regimens are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicina
Main Authors: Shinsuke Suzuki, Satoshi Toyoma, Yohei Kawasaki, Koh Koizumi, Nobuko Iikawa, Kazuhiro Shiina, Tentaro Endo, Tomoe Abe, Teppei Kouga, Takechiyo Yamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/11/1151
_version_ 1850418476752044032
author Shinsuke Suzuki
Satoshi Toyoma
Yohei Kawasaki
Koh Koizumi
Nobuko Iikawa
Kazuhiro Shiina
Tentaro Endo
Tomoe Abe
Teppei Kouga
Takechiyo Yamada
author_facet Shinsuke Suzuki
Satoshi Toyoma
Yohei Kawasaki
Koh Koizumi
Nobuko Iikawa
Kazuhiro Shiina
Tentaro Endo
Tomoe Abe
Teppei Kouga
Takechiyo Yamada
author_sort Shinsuke Suzuki
collection DOAJ
container_title Medicina
description <i>Background and Objectives</i>: In recent years, the effectiveness of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration has attracted attention in various cancers, including head and neck cancers. However, individual assessments of the administered chemotherapy regimens are insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration in recurrent metastatic head and neck cancer by focusing on a single regimen. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological data from the medical records of 18 patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who received systemic chemotherapy with weekly cetuximab and paclitaxel (Cmab + PTX) after progression following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. <i>Results</i>: In all patients, the ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 44.4%, 72.2%, 3.8 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Regarding AEs, three patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. Grade 3 anemia, paronychia, asthenia, and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient each. There were no treatment-related deaths. <i>Conclusions</i>: Cmab + PTX was shown to maintain high efficacy and acceptable safety for R/M HNSCC that progressed after ICI therapy. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment sequences and drug combinations for recurrent R/M HNSCC.
format Article
id doaj-art-8a00537999744e5cb5cbfd781833e46f
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-8a00537999744e5cb5cbfd781833e46f2025-08-19T22:44:00ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442021-10-015711115110.3390/medicina57111151Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaShinsuke Suzuki0Satoshi Toyoma1Yohei Kawasaki2Koh Koizumi3Nobuko Iikawa4Kazuhiro Shiina5Tentaro Endo6Tomoe Abe7Teppei Kouga8Takechiyo Yamada9Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, JapanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 010-8543, Japan<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In recent years, the effectiveness of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration has attracted attention in various cancers, including head and neck cancers. However, individual assessments of the administered chemotherapy regimens are insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration in recurrent metastatic head and neck cancer by focusing on a single regimen. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological data from the medical records of 18 patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who received systemic chemotherapy with weekly cetuximab and paclitaxel (Cmab + PTX) after progression following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. <i>Results</i>: In all patients, the ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 44.4%, 72.2%, 3.8 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Regarding AEs, three patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. Grade 3 anemia, paronychia, asthenia, and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient each. There were no treatment-related deaths. <i>Conclusions</i>: Cmab + PTX was shown to maintain high efficacy and acceptable safety for R/M HNSCC that progressed after ICI therapy. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment sequences and drug combinations for recurrent R/M HNSCC.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/11/1151head and neck squamous cell carcinomacetuximabpaclitaxelimmune checkpoint inhibitorchemotherapy
spellingShingle Shinsuke Suzuki
Satoshi Toyoma
Yohei Kawasaki
Koh Koizumi
Nobuko Iikawa
Kazuhiro Shiina
Tentaro Endo
Tomoe Abe
Teppei Kouga
Takechiyo Yamada
Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
cetuximab
paclitaxel
immune checkpoint inhibitor
chemotherapy
title Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_sort clinical outcomes of cetuximab and paclitaxel after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
topic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
cetuximab
paclitaxel
immune checkpoint inhibitor
chemotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/11/1151
work_keys_str_mv AT shinsukesuzuki clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT satoshitoyoma clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yoheikawasaki clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kohkoizumi clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT nobukoiikawa clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kazuhiroshiina clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT tentaroendo clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT tomoeabe clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT teppeikouga clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT takechiyoyamada clinicaloutcomesofcetuximabandpaclitaxelafterprogressiononimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinrecurrentormetastaticheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma