Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol

Introduction High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an innovative oxygen-delivering technique, which has been shown to effectively decrease the intubation risk in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure of various aetiologies compared with conventional oxygen therapy. Also, it has proved to be non-i...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:BMJ Open
Main Authors: Apichaya Monsomboon, Onlak Ruangsomboon, Nattakarn Praphruetkit
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-01
在線閱讀:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e052761.full
_version_ 1849536049117659136
author Apichaya Monsomboon
Onlak Ruangsomboon
Nattakarn Praphruetkit
author_facet Apichaya Monsomboon
Onlak Ruangsomboon
Nattakarn Praphruetkit
author_sort Apichaya Monsomboon
collection DOAJ
container_title BMJ Open
description Introduction High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an innovative oxygen-delivering technique, which has been shown to effectively decrease the intubation risk in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure of various aetiologies compared with conventional oxygen therapy. Also, it has proved to be non-inferior to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure primarily due to pneumonia. Evidence on its benefits compared with NIPPV, which is the standard of care for patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE) with hypoxaemic respiratory distress, is limited. Therefore, we planned this study to investigate the effects of HFNC compared with NIPPV for emergency patients with ACPE.Methods and analysis In this single-centred, non-blinded, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, we will randomly allocate 240 patients visiting the emergency department with ACPE in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNC or NIPPV for at least 4 hours using computer-generated mixed-block randomisation concealed by sealed opaque envelopes. The primary outcome is the intubation rate in 72 hours after randomisation. The main secondary outcomes are intolerance rate, mortality rate and treatment failure rate (a composite of intolerance, intubation and mortality). The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the intervention. These categorical outcomes will be analysed by calculating the risk ratio. Interim analyses evaluating the primary outcome will be performed after half of the expected sample size are recruited.Ethics and dissemination This study protocol has been approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (study ID: Si 271/2021). It has been granted the Siriraj Research and Development Fund. All participants or their authorised third parties will provide written informed consent prior to trial inclusion. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal and presented at national and international scientific conferences.Trial registration number TCTR20210413001.
format Article
id doaj-art-8cdcf4efc7764677ac8e6e6d98bb1bce
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-8cdcf4efc7764677ac8e6e6d98bb1bce2025-08-20T02:45:52ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-07-0112710.1136/bmjopen-2021-052761Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocolApichaya Monsomboon0Onlak Ruangsomboon1Nattakarn Praphruetkit2Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandIntroduction High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an innovative oxygen-delivering technique, which has been shown to effectively decrease the intubation risk in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure of various aetiologies compared with conventional oxygen therapy. Also, it has proved to be non-inferior to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure primarily due to pneumonia. Evidence on its benefits compared with NIPPV, which is the standard of care for patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE) with hypoxaemic respiratory distress, is limited. Therefore, we planned this study to investigate the effects of HFNC compared with NIPPV for emergency patients with ACPE.Methods and analysis In this single-centred, non-blinded, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, we will randomly allocate 240 patients visiting the emergency department with ACPE in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNC or NIPPV for at least 4 hours using computer-generated mixed-block randomisation concealed by sealed opaque envelopes. The primary outcome is the intubation rate in 72 hours after randomisation. The main secondary outcomes are intolerance rate, mortality rate and treatment failure rate (a composite of intolerance, intubation and mortality). The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the intervention. These categorical outcomes will be analysed by calculating the risk ratio. Interim analyses evaluating the primary outcome will be performed after half of the expected sample size are recruited.Ethics and dissemination This study protocol has been approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (study ID: Si 271/2021). It has been granted the Siriraj Research and Development Fund. All participants or their authorised third parties will provide written informed consent prior to trial inclusion. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal and presented at national and international scientific conferences.Trial registration number TCTR20210413001.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e052761.full
spellingShingle Apichaya Monsomboon
Onlak Ruangsomboon
Nattakarn Praphruetkit
Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol
title Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol
title_full Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol
title_fullStr Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol
title_short Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol
title_sort parallel group randomised controlled non inferiority trial of high flow nasal cannula versus non invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema study protocol
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e052761.full
work_keys_str_mv AT apichayamonsomboon parallelgrouprandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofhighflownasalcannulaversusnoninvasiveventilationforemergencypatientswithacutecardiogenicpulmonaryoedemastudyprotocol
AT onlakruangsomboon parallelgrouprandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofhighflownasalcannulaversusnoninvasiveventilationforemergencypatientswithacutecardiogenicpulmonaryoedemastudyprotocol
AT nattakarnpraphruetkit parallelgrouprandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofhighflownasalcannulaversusnoninvasiveventilationforemergencypatientswithacutecardiogenicpulmonaryoedemastudyprotocol