Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
IntroductionRabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time...
| Published in: | Frontiers in Health Services |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-05-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692/full |
| _version_ | 1850360061852909568 |
|---|---|
| author | Aurélia Faust Nicolas Ray Nicolas Ray |
| author_facet | Aurélia Faust Nicolas Ray Nicolas Ray |
| author_sort | Aurélia Faust |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Frontiers in Health Services |
| description | IntroductionRabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time from bite to treatment. This mini review aims to identify and synthesize recent studies on the consequences of distance and travel time on the victims of these diseases in African countries, in order to discuss potential joint approaches for health system strengthening targeting both diseases.MethodsA literature review was conducted separately for each disease using Pubmed, Google Scholar, and snowball searching. Eligible studies, published between 2017 and 2022, had to discuss any aspect linked to geographical accessibility to treatments for either disease in Africa.ResultsTwenty-two articles (8 on snakebite and 14 on rabies) were eligible for data extraction. No study targeted both diseases. Identified consequences of low accessibility to treatment were classified into 6 categories: (1) Delay to treatment; (2) Outcome; (3) Financial impacts; (4) Under-reporting; (5) Compliance to treatment, and (6) Visits to traditional healers.Discussion and conclusionGeographical access to treatment significantly influences the burden of rabies and snakebite in Africa. In line with WHO's call for integrating approaches among NTDs, there are opportunities to model disease hotspots, assess population coverage, and optimize geographic access to care for both diseases, possibly jointly. This could enhance the management of these NTDs and contribute to achieving the global snakebite and rabies roadmaps by 2030. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8d01e3cef91c48ffbfa7331da514ab31 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2813-0146 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-8d01e3cef91c48ffbfa7331da514ab312025-08-19T23:05:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Health Services2813-01462024-05-01410.3389/frhs.2024.13096921309692Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini reviewAurélia Faust0Nicolas Ray1Nicolas Ray2GeoHealth Group, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandGeoHealth Group, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandInstitute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandIntroductionRabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time from bite to treatment. This mini review aims to identify and synthesize recent studies on the consequences of distance and travel time on the victims of these diseases in African countries, in order to discuss potential joint approaches for health system strengthening targeting both diseases.MethodsA literature review was conducted separately for each disease using Pubmed, Google Scholar, and snowball searching. Eligible studies, published between 2017 and 2022, had to discuss any aspect linked to geographical accessibility to treatments for either disease in Africa.ResultsTwenty-two articles (8 on snakebite and 14 on rabies) were eligible for data extraction. No study targeted both diseases. Identified consequences of low accessibility to treatment were classified into 6 categories: (1) Delay to treatment; (2) Outcome; (3) Financial impacts; (4) Under-reporting; (5) Compliance to treatment, and (6) Visits to traditional healers.Discussion and conclusionGeographical access to treatment significantly influences the burden of rabies and snakebite in Africa. In line with WHO's call for integrating approaches among NTDs, there are opportunities to model disease hotspots, assess population coverage, and optimize geographic access to care for both diseases, possibly jointly. This could enhance the management of these NTDs and contribute to achieving the global snakebite and rabies roadmaps by 2030.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692/fullrabiessnakebiteneglected tropical diseaseAfricaaccessibility |
| spellingShingle | Aurélia Faust Nicolas Ray Nicolas Ray Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review rabies snakebite neglected tropical disease Africa accessibility |
| title | Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review |
| title_full | Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review |
| title_fullStr | Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review |
| title_short | Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review |
| title_sort | consequences of geographical accessibility to post exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in africa a mini review |
| topic | rabies snakebite neglected tropical disease Africa accessibility |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aureliafaust consequencesofgeographicalaccessibilitytopostexposuretreatmentforrabiesandsnakebiteinafricaaminireview AT nicolasray consequencesofgeographicalaccessibilitytopostexposuretreatmentforrabiesandsnakebiteinafricaaminireview AT nicolasray consequencesofgeographicalaccessibilitytopostexposuretreatmentforrabiesandsnakebiteinafricaaminireview |
