Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review

IntroductionRabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Health Services
Main Authors: Aurélia Faust, Nicolas Ray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692/full
_version_ 1850360061852909568
author Aurélia Faust
Nicolas Ray
Nicolas Ray
author_facet Aurélia Faust
Nicolas Ray
Nicolas Ray
author_sort Aurélia Faust
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Health Services
description IntroductionRabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time from bite to treatment. This mini review aims to identify and synthesize recent studies on the consequences of distance and travel time on the victims of these diseases in African countries, in order to discuss potential joint approaches for health system strengthening targeting both diseases.MethodsA literature review was conducted separately for each disease using Pubmed, Google Scholar, and snowball searching. Eligible studies, published between 2017 and 2022, had to discuss any aspect linked to geographical accessibility to treatments for either disease in Africa.ResultsTwenty-two articles (8 on snakebite and 14 on rabies) were eligible for data extraction. No study targeted both diseases. Identified consequences of low accessibility to treatment were classified into 6 categories: (1) Delay to treatment; (2) Outcome; (3) Financial impacts; (4) Under-reporting; (5) Compliance to treatment, and (6) Visits to traditional healers.Discussion and conclusionGeographical access to treatment significantly influences the burden of rabies and snakebite in Africa. In line with WHO's call for integrating approaches among NTDs, there are opportunities to model disease hotspots, assess population coverage, and optimize geographic access to care for both diseases, possibly jointly. This could enhance the management of these NTDs and contribute to achieving the global snakebite and rabies roadmaps by 2030.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d01e3cef91c48ffbfa7331da514ab31
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2813-0146
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-8d01e3cef91c48ffbfa7331da514ab312025-08-19T23:05:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Health Services2813-01462024-05-01410.3389/frhs.2024.13096921309692Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini reviewAurélia Faust0Nicolas Ray1Nicolas Ray2GeoHealth Group, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandGeoHealth Group, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandInstitute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandIntroductionRabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time from bite to treatment. This mini review aims to identify and synthesize recent studies on the consequences of distance and travel time on the victims of these diseases in African countries, in order to discuss potential joint approaches for health system strengthening targeting both diseases.MethodsA literature review was conducted separately for each disease using Pubmed, Google Scholar, and snowball searching. Eligible studies, published between 2017 and 2022, had to discuss any aspect linked to geographical accessibility to treatments for either disease in Africa.ResultsTwenty-two articles (8 on snakebite and 14 on rabies) were eligible for data extraction. No study targeted both diseases. Identified consequences of low accessibility to treatment were classified into 6 categories: (1) Delay to treatment; (2) Outcome; (3) Financial impacts; (4) Under-reporting; (5) Compliance to treatment, and (6) Visits to traditional healers.Discussion and conclusionGeographical access to treatment significantly influences the burden of rabies and snakebite in Africa. In line with WHO's call for integrating approaches among NTDs, there are opportunities to model disease hotspots, assess population coverage, and optimize geographic access to care for both diseases, possibly jointly. This could enhance the management of these NTDs and contribute to achieving the global snakebite and rabies roadmaps by 2030.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692/fullrabiessnakebiteneglected tropical diseaseAfricaaccessibility
spellingShingle Aurélia Faust
Nicolas Ray
Nicolas Ray
Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
rabies
snakebite
neglected tropical disease
Africa
accessibility
title Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
title_full Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
title_fullStr Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
title_short Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review
title_sort consequences of geographical accessibility to post exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in africa a mini review
topic rabies
snakebite
neglected tropical disease
Africa
accessibility
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692/full
work_keys_str_mv AT aureliafaust consequencesofgeographicalaccessibilitytopostexposuretreatmentforrabiesandsnakebiteinafricaaminireview
AT nicolasray consequencesofgeographicalaccessibilitytopostexposuretreatmentforrabiesandsnakebiteinafricaaminireview
AT nicolasray consequencesofgeographicalaccessibilitytopostexposuretreatmentforrabiesandsnakebiteinafricaaminireview