Depoliticization of politics and power: Mouffe and the conservative disposition in postfoundational political theory

• Published in: Frontiers in Political Science
• Main Author: Tuukka Brunila
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01
• Subjects: depoliticization; police; conservatism; postfoundational political philosophy; power; Chantal Mouffe
• Online Access: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.974065/full

Postfoundational political theory has been criticized for being incapable of establishing a normative basis for politics. This is because postfoundationalism's conception of the “political” as a radical contingency disproves the existence of an objective ground that would make it possible to evaluate political movements from a neutral position. In this article, I counter this critique by distinguishing between Chantal Mouffe's political theory and other postfoundational theories based on their respective normative implications. This is done by explicating how Mouffe's way of conceptualizing the political implies a conservative political disposition. In order to accomplish this, I develop an understanding of the conservative political disposition, which refers to the normative idea that police power is necessary for producing and upholding a social order. Through an analysis of Carl Schmitt's theory, I elaborate that the conservative disposition is an attempt to justify the depoliticization of social relations. On the basis of this idea that some political theories have normative implications that are in line with the conservative disposition, I examine postfoundationalism. My argument is that while Mouffe's theory does imply the idea that police power is necessary, this is not the case with other postfoundational theories. On the contrary, other postfoundational democratic theories categorically deny that a form of power, namely police power, would be necessary.