Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose

The host’s physiological well-being is intricately associated with the gut microbiota. However, previous studies regarding the intestinal microbiota have focused on domesticated or captive birds. This study used high-throughput sequencing technology to identify the gut bacterial communities of sympa...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Animals
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Jing Yin, Dandan Yuan, Ziqiu Xu, Yuannuo Wu, Zhong Chen, Xingjia Xiang
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: MDPI AG 2024-06-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/11/1688
_version_ 1850375882399547392
author Jing Yin
Dandan Yuan
Ziqiu Xu
Yuannuo Wu
Zhong Chen
Xingjia Xiang
author_facet Jing Yin
Dandan Yuan
Ziqiu Xu
Yuannuo Wu
Zhong Chen
Xingjia Xiang
author_sort Jing Yin
collection DOAJ
container_title Animals
description The host’s physiological well-being is intricately associated with the gut microbiota. However, previous studies regarding the intestinal microbiota have focused on domesticated or captive birds. This study used high-throughput sequencing technology to identify the gut bacterial communities of sympatric bean geese, hooded cranes, and domestic geese. The results indicated that the gut bacterial diversity in domestic geese and hooded cranes showed considerably higher diversity than bean geese. The gut bacterial community compositions varied significantly among the three hosts (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared to the hooded crane, the bean goose and domestic goose were more similar in their genotype and evolutionary history, with less difference in the bacterial community composition and assembly processes between the two species. Thus, the results might support the crucial role of host genotypes on their gut microbiota. The gut bacteria of wild hooded cranes and bean geese had a greater capacity for energy metabolism compared to domestic geese, suggesting that wild birds may rely more on their gut microbiota to survive in cold conditions. Moreover, the intestines of the three hosts were identified as harboring potential pathogens. The relative abundance of pathogens was higher in the hooded crane compared to the other two species. The hooded crane gut bacterial community assemblage revealed the least deterministic process with the lowest filtering/selection on the gut microbiota, which might have been a reason for the highest number of pathogens result. Compared to the hooded crane, the sympatric bean goose showed the least diversity and relative abundance of pathogens. The intestinal bacterial co-occurrence network showed the highest stability in the bean goose, potentially enhancing host resistance to adverse environments and reducing the susceptibility to pathogen invasion. In this study, the pathogens were also discovered to overlap among the three hosts, reminding us to monitor the potential for pathogen transmission between poultry and wild birds. Overall, the current findings have the potential to enhance the understanding of gut bacterial and pathogenic community structures in poultry and wild birds.
format Article
id doaj-art-97648dc56ada4ae4b986bcd2d7e76c6a
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2076-2615
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-97648dc56ada4ae4b986bcd2d7e76c6a2025-08-19T22:59:23ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152024-06-011411168810.3390/ani14111688Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic GooseJing Yin0Dandan Yuan1Ziqiu Xu2Yuannuo Wu3Zhong Chen4Xingjia Xiang5School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, ChinaThe host’s physiological well-being is intricately associated with the gut microbiota. However, previous studies regarding the intestinal microbiota have focused on domesticated or captive birds. This study used high-throughput sequencing technology to identify the gut bacterial communities of sympatric bean geese, hooded cranes, and domestic geese. The results indicated that the gut bacterial diversity in domestic geese and hooded cranes showed considerably higher diversity than bean geese. The gut bacterial community compositions varied significantly among the three hosts (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared to the hooded crane, the bean goose and domestic goose were more similar in their genotype and evolutionary history, with less difference in the bacterial community composition and assembly processes between the two species. Thus, the results might support the crucial role of host genotypes on their gut microbiota. The gut bacteria of wild hooded cranes and bean geese had a greater capacity for energy metabolism compared to domestic geese, suggesting that wild birds may rely more on their gut microbiota to survive in cold conditions. Moreover, the intestines of the three hosts were identified as harboring potential pathogens. The relative abundance of pathogens was higher in the hooded crane compared to the other two species. The hooded crane gut bacterial community assemblage revealed the least deterministic process with the lowest filtering/selection on the gut microbiota, which might have been a reason for the highest number of pathogens result. Compared to the hooded crane, the sympatric bean goose showed the least diversity and relative abundance of pathogens. The intestinal bacterial co-occurrence network showed the highest stability in the bean goose, potentially enhancing host resistance to adverse environments and reducing the susceptibility to pathogen invasion. In this study, the pathogens were also discovered to overlap among the three hosts, reminding us to monitor the potential for pathogen transmission between poultry and wild birds. Overall, the current findings have the potential to enhance the understanding of gut bacterial and pathogenic community structures in poultry and wild birds.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/11/1688bean goosehooded cranedomestic goosegut bacterial communitypathogens
spellingShingle Jing Yin
Dandan Yuan
Ziqiu Xu
Yuannuo Wu
Zhong Chen
Xingjia Xiang
Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose
bean goose
hooded crane
domestic goose
gut bacterial community
pathogens
title Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose
title_full Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose
title_fullStr Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose
title_full_unstemmed Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose
title_short Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose
title_sort significant differences in intestinal bacterial communities of sympatric bean goose hooded crane and domestic goose
topic bean goose
hooded crane
domestic goose
gut bacterial community
pathogens
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/11/1688
work_keys_str_mv AT jingyin significantdifferencesinintestinalbacterialcommunitiesofsympatricbeangoosehoodedcraneanddomesticgoose
AT dandanyuan significantdifferencesinintestinalbacterialcommunitiesofsympatricbeangoosehoodedcraneanddomesticgoose
AT ziqiuxu significantdifferencesinintestinalbacterialcommunitiesofsympatricbeangoosehoodedcraneanddomesticgoose
AT yuannuowu significantdifferencesinintestinalbacterialcommunitiesofsympatricbeangoosehoodedcraneanddomesticgoose
AT zhongchen significantdifferencesinintestinalbacterialcommunitiesofsympatricbeangoosehoodedcraneanddomesticgoose
AT xingjiaxiang significantdifferencesinintestinalbacterialcommunitiesofsympatricbeangoosehoodedcraneanddomesticgoose