Cardiomegaly Detection on Chest Radiographs: Segmentation Versus Classification

In this study, we investigate the detection of cardiomegaly on frontal chest radiographs through two alternative deep-learning approaches - via anatomical segmentation and via image-level classification. We used the publicly available ChestX-ray14 dataset, and obtained heart and lung segmentation an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE Access
Main Authors: Ecem Sogancioglu, Keelin Murphy, Erdi Calli, Ernst T. Scholten, Steven Schalekamp, Bram Van Ginneken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9096290/
Description
Summary:In this study, we investigate the detection of cardiomegaly on frontal chest radiographs through two alternative deep-learning approaches - via anatomical segmentation and via image-level classification. We used the publicly available ChestX-ray14 dataset, and obtained heart and lung segmentation annotations for 778 chest radiographs for the development of the segmentation-based approach. The classification-based method was trained with 65k standard chest radiographs with image-level labels. For both approaches, the best models were found through hyperparameter searches where architectural, learning, and regularization related parameters were optimized systematically. The resulting models were tested on a set of 367 held-out images for which cardiomegaly annotations were hand-labeled by two independent expert radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The performance of the segmentation-based system with an AUC of 0.977 is significantly better for classifying cardiomegaly than the classification-based model which achieved an AUC of 0.941. Only the segmentation-based model achieved comparable performance to an independent expert reader (AUC of 0.978). We conclude that the segmentation-based model requires 100 times fewer annotated chest radiographs to achieve a substantially better performance, while also producing more interpretable results.
ISSN:2169-3536