Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.

BACKGROUND:To date, liver biopsy is the only means of reliable diagnosis for fatty liver disease (FLD). Owing to the inevitable biopsy-associated health risks, however, the development of valid noninvasive diagnostic tools for FLD is well warranted. AIM:We evaluated a particular metabolic profile wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: Sabine Siegert, Zhonghao Yu, Rui Wang-Sattler, Thomas Illig, Jerzy Adamski, Jochen Hampe, Susanna Nikolaus, Stefan Schreiber, Michael Krawczak, Michael Nothnagel, Ute Nöthlings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3793954?pdf=render
_version_ 1856987207022149632
author Sabine Siegert
Zhonghao Yu
Rui Wang-Sattler
Thomas Illig
Jerzy Adamski
Jochen Hampe
Susanna Nikolaus
Stefan Schreiber
Michael Krawczak
Michael Nothnagel
Ute Nöthlings
author_facet Sabine Siegert
Zhonghao Yu
Rui Wang-Sattler
Thomas Illig
Jerzy Adamski
Jochen Hampe
Susanna Nikolaus
Stefan Schreiber
Michael Krawczak
Michael Nothnagel
Ute Nöthlings
author_sort Sabine Siegert
collection DOAJ
container_title PLoS ONE
description BACKGROUND:To date, liver biopsy is the only means of reliable diagnosis for fatty liver disease (FLD). Owing to the inevitable biopsy-associated health risks, however, the development of valid noninvasive diagnostic tools for FLD is well warranted. AIM:We evaluated a particular metabolic profile with regard to its ability to diagnose FLD and compared its performance to that of established phenotypes, conventional biomarkers and disease-associated genotypes. METHODS:The study population comprised 115 patients with ultrasound-diagnosed FLD and 115 sex- and age-matched controls for whom the serum concentration was measured of 138 different metabolites, including acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, hexose, phosphatidylcholines (PCs), lyso-PCs and sphingomyelins. Established phenotypes, biomarkers, disease-associated genotypes and metabolite data were included in diagnostic models for FLD using logistic regression and partial least-squares discriminant analysis. The discriminative power of the ensuing models was compared with respect to area under curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and by way of cross-validation (CV). RESULTS:Use of metabolic markers for predicting FLD showed the best performance among all considered types of markers, yielding an AUC of 0.8993. Additional information on phenotypes, conventional biomarkers or genotypes did not significantly improve this performance. Phospholipids and branched-chain amino acids were most informative for predicting FLD. CONCLUSION:We show that the inclusion of metabolite data may substantially increase the power to diagnose FLD over that of models based solely upon phenotypes and conventional biomarkers.
format Article
id doaj-art-a26b02b0f3854343bfe1b0befa5ee252
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-a26b02b0f3854343bfe1b0befa5ee2522025-08-19T19:54:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7681310.1371/journal.pone.0076813Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.Sabine SiegertZhonghao YuRui Wang-SattlerThomas IlligJerzy AdamskiJochen HampeSusanna NikolausStefan SchreiberMichael KrawczakMichael NothnagelUte NöthlingsBACKGROUND:To date, liver biopsy is the only means of reliable diagnosis for fatty liver disease (FLD). Owing to the inevitable biopsy-associated health risks, however, the development of valid noninvasive diagnostic tools for FLD is well warranted. AIM:We evaluated a particular metabolic profile with regard to its ability to diagnose FLD and compared its performance to that of established phenotypes, conventional biomarkers and disease-associated genotypes. METHODS:The study population comprised 115 patients with ultrasound-diagnosed FLD and 115 sex- and age-matched controls for whom the serum concentration was measured of 138 different metabolites, including acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, hexose, phosphatidylcholines (PCs), lyso-PCs and sphingomyelins. Established phenotypes, biomarkers, disease-associated genotypes and metabolite data were included in diagnostic models for FLD using logistic regression and partial least-squares discriminant analysis. The discriminative power of the ensuing models was compared with respect to area under curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and by way of cross-validation (CV). RESULTS:Use of metabolic markers for predicting FLD showed the best performance among all considered types of markers, yielding an AUC of 0.8993. Additional information on phenotypes, conventional biomarkers or genotypes did not significantly improve this performance. Phospholipids and branched-chain amino acids were most informative for predicting FLD. CONCLUSION:We show that the inclusion of metabolite data may substantially increase the power to diagnose FLD over that of models based solely upon phenotypes and conventional biomarkers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3793954?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sabine Siegert
Zhonghao Yu
Rui Wang-Sattler
Thomas Illig
Jerzy Adamski
Jochen Hampe
Susanna Nikolaus
Stefan Schreiber
Michael Krawczak
Michael Nothnagel
Ute Nöthlings
Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
title Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
title_full Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
title_fullStr Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
title_short Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
title_sort diagnosing fatty liver disease a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers phenotypes genotypes and established biomarkers
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3793954?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinesiegert diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT zhonghaoyu diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT ruiwangsattler diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT thomasillig diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT jerzyadamski diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT jochenhampe diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT susannanikolaus diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT stefanschreiber diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT michaelkrawczak diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT michaelnothnagel diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers
AT utenothlings diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers