Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.
BACKGROUND:To date, liver biopsy is the only means of reliable diagnosis for fatty liver disease (FLD). Owing to the inevitable biopsy-associated health risks, however, the development of valid noninvasive diagnostic tools for FLD is well warranted. AIM:We evaluated a particular metabolic profile wi...
| Published in: | PLoS ONE |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3793954?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1856987207022149632 |
|---|---|
| author | Sabine Siegert Zhonghao Yu Rui Wang-Sattler Thomas Illig Jerzy Adamski Jochen Hampe Susanna Nikolaus Stefan Schreiber Michael Krawczak Michael Nothnagel Ute Nöthlings |
| author_facet | Sabine Siegert Zhonghao Yu Rui Wang-Sattler Thomas Illig Jerzy Adamski Jochen Hampe Susanna Nikolaus Stefan Schreiber Michael Krawczak Michael Nothnagel Ute Nöthlings |
| author_sort | Sabine Siegert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | PLoS ONE |
| description | BACKGROUND:To date, liver biopsy is the only means of reliable diagnosis for fatty liver disease (FLD). Owing to the inevitable biopsy-associated health risks, however, the development of valid noninvasive diagnostic tools for FLD is well warranted. AIM:We evaluated a particular metabolic profile with regard to its ability to diagnose FLD and compared its performance to that of established phenotypes, conventional biomarkers and disease-associated genotypes. METHODS:The study population comprised 115 patients with ultrasound-diagnosed FLD and 115 sex- and age-matched controls for whom the serum concentration was measured of 138 different metabolites, including acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, hexose, phosphatidylcholines (PCs), lyso-PCs and sphingomyelins. Established phenotypes, biomarkers, disease-associated genotypes and metabolite data were included in diagnostic models for FLD using logistic regression and partial least-squares discriminant analysis. The discriminative power of the ensuing models was compared with respect to area under curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and by way of cross-validation (CV). RESULTS:Use of metabolic markers for predicting FLD showed the best performance among all considered types of markers, yielding an AUC of 0.8993. Additional information on phenotypes, conventional biomarkers or genotypes did not significantly improve this performance. Phospholipids and branched-chain amino acids were most informative for predicting FLD. CONCLUSION:We show that the inclusion of metabolite data may substantially increase the power to diagnose FLD over that of models based solely upon phenotypes and conventional biomarkers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a26b02b0f3854343bfe1b0befa5ee252 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-a26b02b0f3854343bfe1b0befa5ee2522025-08-19T19:54:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7681310.1371/journal.pone.0076813Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers.Sabine SiegertZhonghao YuRui Wang-SattlerThomas IlligJerzy AdamskiJochen HampeSusanna NikolausStefan SchreiberMichael KrawczakMichael NothnagelUte NöthlingsBACKGROUND:To date, liver biopsy is the only means of reliable diagnosis for fatty liver disease (FLD). Owing to the inevitable biopsy-associated health risks, however, the development of valid noninvasive diagnostic tools for FLD is well warranted. AIM:We evaluated a particular metabolic profile with regard to its ability to diagnose FLD and compared its performance to that of established phenotypes, conventional biomarkers and disease-associated genotypes. METHODS:The study population comprised 115 patients with ultrasound-diagnosed FLD and 115 sex- and age-matched controls for whom the serum concentration was measured of 138 different metabolites, including acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, hexose, phosphatidylcholines (PCs), lyso-PCs and sphingomyelins. Established phenotypes, biomarkers, disease-associated genotypes and metabolite data were included in diagnostic models for FLD using logistic regression and partial least-squares discriminant analysis. The discriminative power of the ensuing models was compared with respect to area under curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and by way of cross-validation (CV). RESULTS:Use of metabolic markers for predicting FLD showed the best performance among all considered types of markers, yielding an AUC of 0.8993. Additional information on phenotypes, conventional biomarkers or genotypes did not significantly improve this performance. Phospholipids and branched-chain amino acids were most informative for predicting FLD. CONCLUSION:We show that the inclusion of metabolite data may substantially increase the power to diagnose FLD over that of models based solely upon phenotypes and conventional biomarkers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3793954?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Sabine Siegert Zhonghao Yu Rui Wang-Sattler Thomas Illig Jerzy Adamski Jochen Hampe Susanna Nikolaus Stefan Schreiber Michael Krawczak Michael Nothnagel Ute Nöthlings Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers. |
| title | Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers. |
| title_full | Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers. |
| title_fullStr | Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers. |
| title_short | Diagnosing fatty liver disease: a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers, phenotypes, genotypes and established biomarkers. |
| title_sort | diagnosing fatty liver disease a comparative evaluation of metabolic markers phenotypes genotypes and established biomarkers |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3793954?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sabinesiegert diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT zhonghaoyu diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT ruiwangsattler diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT thomasillig diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT jerzyadamski diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT jochenhampe diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT susannanikolaus diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT stefanschreiber diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT michaelkrawczak diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT michaelnothnagel diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers AT utenothlings diagnosingfattyliverdiseaseacomparativeevaluationofmetabolicmarkersphenotypesgenotypesandestablishedbiomarkers |
