Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania
Background Substantial heterogeneity in HIV prevalence has been observed within sub‐Saharan Africa. It is not clear which factors can explain these differences. Our aim was to identify risk factors that could explain the large differences in HIV‐1 prevalence among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe,...
| 發表在: | Journal of the International AIDS Society |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| 格式: | Article |
| 語言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
Wiley
2010-01-01
|
| 在線閱讀: | https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-45 |
| _version_ | 1852680985886326784 |
|---|---|
| author | Munyaradzi P Mapingure Sia Msuya Nyaradzai E Kurewa Marshal W Munjoma Noel Sam Mike Z Chirenje Simbarashe Rusakaniko Letten F Saugstad Sake J deVlas Babill Stray‐Pedersen |
| author_facet | Munyaradzi P Mapingure Sia Msuya Nyaradzai E Kurewa Marshal W Munjoma Noel Sam Mike Z Chirenje Simbarashe Rusakaniko Letten F Saugstad Sake J deVlas Babill Stray‐Pedersen |
| author_sort | Munyaradzi P Mapingure |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of the International AIDS Society |
| description | Background Substantial heterogeneity in HIV prevalence has been observed within sub‐Saharan Africa. It is not clear which factors can explain these differences. Our aim was to identify risk factors that could explain the large differences in HIV‐1 prevalence among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe, and Moshi, Tanzania. Methods Cross‐sectional data from a two‐centre study that enrolled pregnant women in Harare (N = 691) and Moshi (N = 2654) was used. Consenting women were interviewed about their socio‐demographic background and sexual behaviour, and tested for presence of sexually transmitted infections and reproductive tract infections. Prevalence distribution of risk factors for HIV acquisition and spread were compared between the two areas. Results The prevalence of HIV‐1 among pregnant women was 26% in Zimbabwe and 7% in Tanzania. The HIV prevalence in both countries rises constantly with age up to the 25‐30 year age group. After that, it continues to rise among Zimbabwean women, while it drops for Tanzanian women. Risky sexual behaviour was more prominent among Tanzanians than Zimbabweans. Mobility and such infections as HSV‐2, trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis were more prevalent among Zimbabweans than Tanzanians. Reported male partner circumcision rates between the two countries were widely different, but the effect of male circumcision on HIV prevalence was not apparent within the populations. Conclusions The higher HIV‐1 prevalence among pregnant women in Zimbabwe compared with Tanzania cannot be explained by differences in risky sexual behaviour: all risk factors tested for in our study were higher for Tanzania than Zimbabwe. Non‐sexual transmission of HIV might have played an important role in variation of HIV prevalence. Male circumcision rates and mobility could contribute to the rate and extent of spread of HIV in the two countries. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a510ba2ccdcd4d1bb73fbd8e3d6e31e1 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1758-2652 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2010-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-a510ba2ccdcd4d1bb73fbd8e3d6e31e12025-08-19T21:28:36ZengWileyJournal of the International AIDS Society1758-26522010-01-01131454510.1186/1758-2652-13-45Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and TanzaniaMunyaradzi P Mapingure0Sia Msuya1Nyaradzai E Kurewa2Marshal W Munjoma3Noel Sam4Mike Z Chirenje5Simbarashe Rusakaniko6Letten F Saugstad7Sake J deVlas8Babill Stray‐Pedersen9Department of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, ZimbabweKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, TanzaniaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, TanzaniaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, ZimbabweDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, ZimbabweLetten Research Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayBackground Substantial heterogeneity in HIV prevalence has been observed within sub‐Saharan Africa. It is not clear which factors can explain these differences. Our aim was to identify risk factors that could explain the large differences in HIV‐1 prevalence among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe, and Moshi, Tanzania. Methods Cross‐sectional data from a two‐centre study that enrolled pregnant women in Harare (N = 691) and Moshi (N = 2654) was used. Consenting women were interviewed about their socio‐demographic background and sexual behaviour, and tested for presence of sexually transmitted infections and reproductive tract infections. Prevalence distribution of risk factors for HIV acquisition and spread were compared between the two areas. Results The prevalence of HIV‐1 among pregnant women was 26% in Zimbabwe and 7% in Tanzania. The HIV prevalence in both countries rises constantly with age up to the 25‐30 year age group. After that, it continues to rise among Zimbabwean women, while it drops for Tanzanian women. Risky sexual behaviour was more prominent among Tanzanians than Zimbabweans. Mobility and such infections as HSV‐2, trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis were more prevalent among Zimbabweans than Tanzanians. Reported male partner circumcision rates between the two countries were widely different, but the effect of male circumcision on HIV prevalence was not apparent within the populations. Conclusions The higher HIV‐1 prevalence among pregnant women in Zimbabwe compared with Tanzania cannot be explained by differences in risky sexual behaviour: all risk factors tested for in our study were higher for Tanzania than Zimbabwe. Non‐sexual transmission of HIV might have played an important role in variation of HIV prevalence. Male circumcision rates and mobility could contribute to the rate and extent of spread of HIV in the two countries.https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-45 |
| spellingShingle | Munyaradzi P Mapingure Sia Msuya Nyaradzai E Kurewa Marshal W Munjoma Noel Sam Mike Z Chirenje Simbarashe Rusakaniko Letten F Saugstad Sake J deVlas Babill Stray‐Pedersen Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania |
| title | Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania |
| title_full | Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania |
| title_fullStr | Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania |
| title_short | Sexual behaviour does not reflect HIV‐1 prevalence differences: a comparison study of Zimbabwe and Tanzania |
| title_sort | sexual behaviour does not reflect hiv 1 prevalence differences a comparison study of zimbabwe and tanzania |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-45 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT munyaradzipmapingure sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT siamsuya sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT nyaradzaiekurewa sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT marshalwmunjoma sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT noelsam sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT mikezchirenje sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT simbarasherusakaniko sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT lettenfsaugstad sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT sakejdevlas sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania AT babillstraypedersen sexualbehaviourdoesnotreflecthiv1prevalencedifferencesacomparisonstudyofzimbabweandtanzania |
