The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial
Background: This study aimed to use anthropometric measurements taken pre- and post-operation to evaluate quantitative assessment of modified Millard technique compared with Tennison-Randall technique in unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair. Materials and Methods: Prospective randomised controlled stud...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | African Journal of Paediatric Surgery |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-01-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2024;volume=21;issue=1;spage=12;epage=17;aulast=Abdullateef |
| _version_ | 1850109993285582848 |
|---|---|
| author | Khaled Salah Abdullateef Mohamed A M. Nagaty Mohamed Fathy Khaled Abdelmoneim Elmenawi Abeer Aboalazayem Mohamed H Abouelfadl |
| author_facet | Khaled Salah Abdullateef Mohamed A M. Nagaty Mohamed Fathy Khaled Abdelmoneim Elmenawi Abeer Aboalazayem Mohamed H Abouelfadl |
| author_sort | Khaled Salah Abdullateef |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | African Journal of Paediatric Surgery |
| description | Background: This study aimed to use anthropometric measurements taken pre- and post-operation to evaluate quantitative assessment of modified Millard technique compared with Tennison-Randall technique in unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair. Materials and Methods: Prospective randomised controlled study recruited infants scheduled for UCL repair. Infants aged 2–6 months, either complete or incomplete deformity. A total of 68 patients were randomised in 1:1 ratio to undergo either modified Millard technique (Group I) or Tennison-Randall technique (Group II). Results: Group I had significantly longer operative time than Group II (85.7 ± 7.4 vs. 68.7 ± 8.8 min, respectively; P < 0.001). Group I has less post-operative wound infection, wound dehiscence and wound scarring than Group II, but Group II has less post-operative lip notch. In Group I, greater increases in post-operative horizontal lip length and vertical lip height were observed, compared to Group II, without statistically significant difference. Group I showed a greater reduction in nasal width and total nasal width than Group II, without statistically significance. Group II had a greater increase in philtral height. However, only post-operative Cupid's-bow width was significantly different between two groups (P = 0.041). Conclusion: Overall results demonstrate no significant differences between modified Millard technique and Tennison-Randall technique. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a51c7674fd094d00a9977276de3a0f26 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 0189-6725 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-a51c7674fd094d00a9977276de3a0f262025-08-20T00:00:03ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAfrican Journal of Paediatric Surgery0189-67252024-01-01211121710.4103/ajps.ajps_99_22The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trialKhaled Salah AbdullateefMohamed A M. NagatyMohamed FathyKhaled Abdelmoneim ElmenawiAbeer AboalazayemMohamed H AbouelfadlBackground: This study aimed to use anthropometric measurements taken pre- and post-operation to evaluate quantitative assessment of modified Millard technique compared with Tennison-Randall technique in unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair. Materials and Methods: Prospective randomised controlled study recruited infants scheduled for UCL repair. Infants aged 2–6 months, either complete or incomplete deformity. A total of 68 patients were randomised in 1:1 ratio to undergo either modified Millard technique (Group I) or Tennison-Randall technique (Group II). Results: Group I had significantly longer operative time than Group II (85.7 ± 7.4 vs. 68.7 ± 8.8 min, respectively; P < 0.001). Group I has less post-operative wound infection, wound dehiscence and wound scarring than Group II, but Group II has less post-operative lip notch. In Group I, greater increases in post-operative horizontal lip length and vertical lip height were observed, compared to Group II, without statistically significant difference. Group I showed a greater reduction in nasal width and total nasal width than Group II, without statistically significance. Group II had a greater increase in philtral height. However, only post-operative Cupid's-bow width was significantly different between two groups (P = 0.041). Conclusion: Overall results demonstrate no significant differences between modified Millard technique and Tennison-Randall technique.http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2024;volume=21;issue=1;spage=12;epage=17;aulast=Abdullateefmillard techniquetennison-randall techniqueunilateral cleft lip |
| spellingShingle | Khaled Salah Abdullateef Mohamed A M. Nagaty Mohamed Fathy Khaled Abdelmoneim Elmenawi Abeer Aboalazayem Mohamed H Abouelfadl The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial millard technique tennison-randall technique unilateral cleft lip |
| title | The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial |
| title_full | The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial |
| title_fullStr | The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial |
| title_short | The outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison-randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair: A comparative trial |
| title_sort | outcomes of modified millard technique versus tennison randall technique in unilateral cleft lip repair a comparative trial |
| topic | millard technique tennison-randall technique unilateral cleft lip |
| url | http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2024;volume=21;issue=1;spage=12;epage=17;aulast=Abdullateef |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT khaledsalahabdullateef theoutcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT mohamedamnagaty theoutcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT mohamedfathy theoutcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT khaledabdelmoneimelmenawi theoutcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT abeeraboalazayem theoutcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT mohamedhabouelfadl theoutcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT khaledsalahabdullateef outcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT mohamedamnagaty outcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT mohamedfathy outcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT khaledabdelmoneimelmenawi outcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT abeeraboalazayem outcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial AT mohamedhabouelfadl outcomesofmodifiedmillardtechniqueversustennisonrandalltechniqueinunilateralcleftliprepairacomparativetrial |
