Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol

• Published in: BMJ Open
• Main Authors: Gina Dimitropoulos, Patricia Trbovich, Jan Willem Gorter, Claire Barber, Kristin Cleverley, Dmitry Khodyakov, Lisha Lo, Kyle Chambers, Alene Toulany, Geetha Mukerji, Rayzel Shulman, Laura Williams, Katherine Bailey, Melanie Penner, Amanda Higgins, Michelle Batthish, Sarah E. P. Munce, Elliott Wong, Dorothy Luong, Justin Rao, Jessie Cunningham, Tomisin John, Marilyn Crabtree, Sanober Diaz, Danijela Grahovac, Ruth Grimes, Beverly Guttman, Michèle L Hébert, Megan Henze, Elaine Li, Laura Macgregor, Sarah Mooney, Samadhi Mora Severino, Jacklynn Pidduck, Lisa Stromquist, Michelle Wan, Darryl Yates
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-05-01
• Online Access: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/5/e080822.full

Introduction Patient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Methods and analysis Following the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. Abstracted data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Protocol registration https://osf.io/beqjr