Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade

To solve the problem of the slow convergence of the geometry-based correction (GC) method in the design of a steam turbine blade, this paper proposes a geometry-load-based hybrid correction (GLHC) method. In this method, the deformation of the blade caused by the centrifugal load is still corrected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Authors: Guodong Yi, Huifang Zhou, Lemiao Qiu, Jundi Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2471
_version_ 1850410451884572672
author Guodong Yi
Huifang Zhou
Lemiao Qiu
Jundi Wu
author_facet Guodong Yi
Huifang Zhou
Lemiao Qiu
Jundi Wu
author_sort Guodong Yi
collection DOAJ
container_title Energies
description To solve the problem of the slow convergence of the geometry-based correction (GC) method in the design of a steam turbine blade, this paper proposes a geometry-load-based hybrid correction (GLHC) method. In this method, the deformation of the blade caused by the centrifugal load is still corrected by the GC method, while the deformation caused by the aerodynamic load is corrected by the load-based correction (LC) method instead of the GC method. The LC method updates the cold shape of the blade by reversely applying the aerodynamic load to the ideal shape according to the balance between the internal force generated by the deformation of the blade and the aerodynamic load acting on surface of the hot blade shape, thereby reducing the number of iterations by reducing the shape deviation in each step of the iteration. The GLHC method, which combines the GC and LC methods, is used to improve the design process. The efficiency of the GLHC and GC methods are compared with the maximum number of position deviations of the corresponding mesh nodes between the hot blade and ideal blade shapes, which acts as the criterion. The results show that the GLHC method reduces the number of iterations.
format Article
id doaj-art-a69396d76f104c54bdfd69d5b5fa59f4
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-a69396d76f104c54bdfd69d5b5fa59f42025-08-19T22:46:55ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-011310247110.3390/en13102471Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine BladeGuodong Yi0Huifang Zhou1Lemiao Qiu2Jundi Wu3State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaTo solve the problem of the slow convergence of the geometry-based correction (GC) method in the design of a steam turbine blade, this paper proposes a geometry-load-based hybrid correction (GLHC) method. In this method, the deformation of the blade caused by the centrifugal load is still corrected by the GC method, while the deformation caused by the aerodynamic load is corrected by the load-based correction (LC) method instead of the GC method. The LC method updates the cold shape of the blade by reversely applying the aerodynamic load to the ideal shape according to the balance between the internal force generated by the deformation of the blade and the aerodynamic load acting on surface of the hot blade shape, thereby reducing the number of iterations by reducing the shape deviation in each step of the iteration. The GLHC method, which combines the GC and LC methods, is used to improve the design process. The efficiency of the GLHC and GC methods are compared with the maximum number of position deviations of the corresponding mesh nodes between the hot blade and ideal blade shapes, which acts as the criterion. The results show that the GLHC method reduces the number of iterations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2471steam turbinebladepre-deformation designgeometry-based correctionload-based correctiongeometry-load based hybrid correction
spellingShingle Guodong Yi
Huifang Zhou
Lemiao Qiu
Jundi Wu
Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade
steam turbine
blade
pre-deformation design
geometry-based correction
load-based correction
geometry-load based hybrid correction
title Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade
title_full Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade
title_fullStr Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade
title_full_unstemmed Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade
title_short Geometry-Load Based Hybrid Correction Method for the Pre-Deformation Design of a Steam Turbine Blade
title_sort geometry load based hybrid correction method for the pre deformation design of a steam turbine blade
topic steam turbine
blade
pre-deformation design
geometry-based correction
load-based correction
geometry-load based hybrid correction
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2471
work_keys_str_mv AT guodongyi geometryloadbasedhybridcorrectionmethodforthepredeformationdesignofasteamturbineblade
AT huifangzhou geometryloadbasedhybridcorrectionmethodforthepredeformationdesignofasteamturbineblade
AT lemiaoqiu geometryloadbasedhybridcorrectionmethodforthepredeformationdesignofasteamturbineblade
AT jundiwu geometryloadbasedhybridcorrectionmethodforthepredeformationdesignofasteamturbineblade