Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union
The European Union encourages and institutionalizes participation by environmental, consumer, and labor organizations in the governance of nanotechnology. Interviews with leaders of the civil society organizations (CSOs) show that they identified multiple problems with nanotechnology policy but had...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Engaging Science, Technology, and Society |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Society for Social Studies of Science
2016-06-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://estsjournal.org/article/view/35/25 |
| _version_ | 1850071208124481536 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna Lamprou David J. Hess |
| author_facet | Anna Lamprou David J. Hess |
| author_sort | Anna Lamprou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Engaging Science, Technology, and Society |
| description | The European Union encourages and institutionalizes participation by environmental, consumer, and labor organizations in the governance of nanotechnology. Interviews with leaders of the civil society organizations (CSOs) show that they identified multiple problems with nanotechnology policy but had only limited success in gaining the changes that they sought. CSO leaders explain their lack of success as due to the overwhelming power of industry and the support of the European Commission for new industrial development, including nanotechnology. We analyze the perspectives of CSO leaders about their difficulties to develop the theory of the political opportunity structure in the situation of a highly scientized policy field with strong industrial monitoring. We suggest the need to extend the theory to pay more attention to the strategies that reformers can use to maneuver in and to open a relatively closed political opportunity structure. We argue that formal stakeholder engagement is not very effective and suggest instead the importance of the following: building coalitions with government actors, threatening or mobilizing grassroots mobilization, making the issue salient to the public, and pursuing the full range of institutional repertoires. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ab35dce7e47a41e09f00a624d049eebb |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2413-8053 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-06-01 |
| publisher | Society for Social Studies of Science |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-ab35dce7e47a41e09f00a624d049eebb2025-08-20T00:17:15ZengSociety for Social Studies of ScienceEngaging Science, Technology, and Society2413-80532016-06-0123354doi:10.17351/ests2016.35Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European UnionAnna Lamprou0David J. Hess1Panswiss ProjectVanderbilt UniversityThe European Union encourages and institutionalizes participation by environmental, consumer, and labor organizations in the governance of nanotechnology. Interviews with leaders of the civil society organizations (CSOs) show that they identified multiple problems with nanotechnology policy but had only limited success in gaining the changes that they sought. CSO leaders explain their lack of success as due to the overwhelming power of industry and the support of the European Commission for new industrial development, including nanotechnology. We analyze the perspectives of CSO leaders about their difficulties to develop the theory of the political opportunity structure in the situation of a highly scientized policy field with strong industrial monitoring. We suggest the need to extend the theory to pay more attention to the strategies that reformers can use to maneuver in and to open a relatively closed political opportunity structure. We argue that formal stakeholder engagement is not very effective and suggest instead the importance of the following: building coalitions with government actors, threatening or mobilizing grassroots mobilization, making the issue salient to the public, and pursuing the full range of institutional repertoires.http://estsjournal.org/article/view/35/25nanotechnologycivil societyEuropean Union |
| spellingShingle | Anna Lamprou David J. Hess Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union nanotechnology civil society European Union |
| title | Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union |
| title_full | Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union |
| title_fullStr | Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union |
| title_full_unstemmed | Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union |
| title_short | Finding Political Opportunities: Civil Society, Industrial Power, and the Governance of Nanotechnology in the European Union |
| title_sort | finding political opportunities civil society industrial power and the governance of nanotechnology in the european union |
| topic | nanotechnology civil society European Union |
| url | http://estsjournal.org/article/view/35/25 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annalamprou findingpoliticalopportunitiescivilsocietyindustrialpowerandthegovernanceofnanotechnologyintheeuropeanunion AT davidjhess findingpoliticalopportunitiescivilsocietyindustrialpowerandthegovernanceofnanotechnologyintheeuropeanunion |
