The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence

The digital sharing economy is commonly seen as a promising circular consumption model that could potentially deliver environmental benefits through more efficient use of existing product stocks. Yet whether sharing is indeed more environmentally benign than prevalent consumption models and what fea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Tamar Meshulam, Sarah Goldberg, Diana Ivanova, Tamar Makov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00
_version_ 1850124997990809600
author Tamar Meshulam
Sarah Goldberg
Diana Ivanova
Tamar Makov
author_facet Tamar Meshulam
Sarah Goldberg
Diana Ivanova
Tamar Makov
author_sort Tamar Meshulam
collection DOAJ
container_title Environmental Research Letters
description The digital sharing economy is commonly seen as a promising circular consumption model that could potentially deliver environmental benefits through more efficient use of existing product stocks. Yet whether sharing is indeed more environmentally benign than prevalent consumption models and what features shape platforms’ sustainability remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conduct a systematic literature review of empirical peer reviewed and conference proceeding publications. We screen over 2200 papers and compile a dataset of 155 empirical papers, and consolidate reported results on the environmental impacts of the sharing economy. We find that sharing is not inherently better from an environmental perspective. The type of resource shared, logistic operations, and the ways in which sharing influences users’ consumption more broadly affect environmental outcomes. Sharing goods is generally associated with better environmental outcomes compared to shared accommodations or mobility. Within mobility, shared scooters and ride-hailing emerge as particularly prone to negative environmental outcomes. Contrary to previous suggestions, peer-to-peer sharing (vs. centralized ownership) does not seem to be a good proxy for environmental performance. As sharing becomes intertwined with urbanization, efforts to steer digital sharing towards environmental sustainability should consider system levels effects and take into account platform operations as well as potential changes in consumer behavior.
format Article
id doaj-art-abda7153a01a4eaa931b4e06c17fa568
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1748-9326
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-abda7153a01a4eaa931b4e06c17fa5682025-08-19T23:54:50ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262023-01-0119101300410.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidenceTamar Meshulam0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4642-0655Sarah Goldberg1Diana Ivanova2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3890-481XTamar Makov3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-5864Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, Israel; The Goldman Sonnenfeld School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, IsraelThe Goldman Sonnenfeld School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, IsraelSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds , Leeds, United KingdomGuilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, Israel; The Goldman Sonnenfeld School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, IsraelThe digital sharing economy is commonly seen as a promising circular consumption model that could potentially deliver environmental benefits through more efficient use of existing product stocks. Yet whether sharing is indeed more environmentally benign than prevalent consumption models and what features shape platforms’ sustainability remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conduct a systematic literature review of empirical peer reviewed and conference proceeding publications. We screen over 2200 papers and compile a dataset of 155 empirical papers, and consolidate reported results on the environmental impacts of the sharing economy. We find that sharing is not inherently better from an environmental perspective. The type of resource shared, logistic operations, and the ways in which sharing influences users’ consumption more broadly affect environmental outcomes. Sharing goods is generally associated with better environmental outcomes compared to shared accommodations or mobility. Within mobility, shared scooters and ride-hailing emerge as particularly prone to negative environmental outcomes. Contrary to previous suggestions, peer-to-peer sharing (vs. centralized ownership) does not seem to be a good proxy for environmental performance. As sharing becomes intertwined with urbanization, efforts to steer digital sharing towards environmental sustainability should consider system levels effects and take into account platform operations as well as potential changes in consumer behavior.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00sharing economyenvironmental impactsproduct service system (PSS)platform economycollaborative consumptioncircular economy
spellingShingle Tamar Meshulam
Sarah Goldberg
Diana Ivanova
Tamar Makov
The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
sharing economy
environmental impacts
product service system (PSS)
platform economy
collaborative consumption
circular economy
title The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
title_full The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
title_fullStr The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
title_full_unstemmed The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
title_short The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
title_sort sharing economy is not always greener a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
topic sharing economy
environmental impacts
product service system (PSS)
platform economy
collaborative consumption
circular economy
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00
work_keys_str_mv AT tamarmeshulam thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT sarahgoldberg thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT dianaivanova thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT tamarmakov thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT tamarmeshulam sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT sarahgoldberg sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT dianaivanova sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence
AT tamarmakov sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence