The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence
The digital sharing economy is commonly seen as a promising circular consumption model that could potentially deliver environmental benefits through more efficient use of existing product stocks. Yet whether sharing is indeed more environmentally benign than prevalent consumption models and what fea...
| Published in: | Environmental Research Letters |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2023-01-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00 |
| _version_ | 1850124997990809600 |
|---|---|
| author | Tamar Meshulam Sarah Goldberg Diana Ivanova Tamar Makov |
| author_facet | Tamar Meshulam Sarah Goldberg Diana Ivanova Tamar Makov |
| author_sort | Tamar Meshulam |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Environmental Research Letters |
| description | The digital sharing economy is commonly seen as a promising circular consumption model that could potentially deliver environmental benefits through more efficient use of existing product stocks. Yet whether sharing is indeed more environmentally benign than prevalent consumption models and what features shape platforms’ sustainability remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conduct a systematic literature review of empirical peer reviewed and conference proceeding publications. We screen over 2200 papers and compile a dataset of 155 empirical papers, and consolidate reported results on the environmental impacts of the sharing economy. We find that sharing is not inherently better from an environmental perspective. The type of resource shared, logistic operations, and the ways in which sharing influences users’ consumption more broadly affect environmental outcomes. Sharing goods is generally associated with better environmental outcomes compared to shared accommodations or mobility. Within mobility, shared scooters and ride-hailing emerge as particularly prone to negative environmental outcomes. Contrary to previous suggestions, peer-to-peer sharing (vs. centralized ownership) does not seem to be a good proxy for environmental performance. As sharing becomes intertwined with urbanization, efforts to steer digital sharing towards environmental sustainability should consider system levels effects and take into account platform operations as well as potential changes in consumer behavior. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-abda7153a01a4eaa931b4e06c17fa568 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1748-9326 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-abda7153a01a4eaa931b4e06c17fa5682025-08-19T23:54:50ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262023-01-0119101300410.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidenceTamar Meshulam0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4642-0655Sarah Goldberg1Diana Ivanova2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3890-481XTamar Makov3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-5864Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, Israel; The Goldman Sonnenfeld School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, IsraelThe Goldman Sonnenfeld School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, IsraelSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds , Leeds, United KingdomGuilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, Israel; The Goldman Sonnenfeld School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, IsraelThe digital sharing economy is commonly seen as a promising circular consumption model that could potentially deliver environmental benefits through more efficient use of existing product stocks. Yet whether sharing is indeed more environmentally benign than prevalent consumption models and what features shape platforms’ sustainability remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conduct a systematic literature review of empirical peer reviewed and conference proceeding publications. We screen over 2200 papers and compile a dataset of 155 empirical papers, and consolidate reported results on the environmental impacts of the sharing economy. We find that sharing is not inherently better from an environmental perspective. The type of resource shared, logistic operations, and the ways in which sharing influences users’ consumption more broadly affect environmental outcomes. Sharing goods is generally associated with better environmental outcomes compared to shared accommodations or mobility. Within mobility, shared scooters and ride-hailing emerge as particularly prone to negative environmental outcomes. Contrary to previous suggestions, peer-to-peer sharing (vs. centralized ownership) does not seem to be a good proxy for environmental performance. As sharing becomes intertwined with urbanization, efforts to steer digital sharing towards environmental sustainability should consider system levels effects and take into account platform operations as well as potential changes in consumer behavior.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00sharing economyenvironmental impactsproduct service system (PSS)platform economycollaborative consumptioncircular economy |
| spellingShingle | Tamar Meshulam Sarah Goldberg Diana Ivanova Tamar Makov The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence sharing economy environmental impacts product service system (PSS) platform economy collaborative consumption circular economy |
| title | The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence |
| title_full | The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence |
| title_fullStr | The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence |
| title_short | The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence |
| title_sort | sharing economy is not always greener a review and consolidation of empirical evidence |
| topic | sharing economy environmental impacts product service system (PSS) platform economy collaborative consumption circular economy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f00 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tamarmeshulam thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT sarahgoldberg thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT dianaivanova thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT tamarmakov thesharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT tamarmeshulam sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT sarahgoldberg sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT dianaivanova sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence AT tamarmakov sharingeconomyisnotalwaysgreenerareviewandconsolidationofempiricalevidence |
