Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice

Abstract Background Schistosome eggs are trapped in host liver and elicit severe hepatic granulomatous inflammation, which can lead to periportal fibrosis, portal hypertension, hemorrhage, or even death in the host. It was reported that the macrophage plays an important role in host immune responses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Parasites & Vectors
Main Authors: Jifeng Zhu, Zhipeng Xu, Xiaojun Chen, Sha Zhou, Weiwei Zhang, Ying Chi, Wei Li, Xian Song, Feng Liu, Chuan Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2014-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-122
_version_ 1851906605083262976
author Jifeng Zhu
Zhipeng Xu
Xiaojun Chen
Sha Zhou
Weiwei Zhang
Ying Chi
Wei Li
Xian Song
Feng Liu
Chuan Su
author_facet Jifeng Zhu
Zhipeng Xu
Xiaojun Chen
Sha Zhou
Weiwei Zhang
Ying Chi
Wei Li
Xian Song
Feng Liu
Chuan Su
author_sort Jifeng Zhu
collection DOAJ
container_title Parasites & Vectors
description Abstract Background Schistosome eggs are trapped in host liver and elicit severe hepatic granulomatous inflammation, which can lead to periportal fibrosis, portal hypertension, hemorrhage, or even death in the host. It was reported that the macrophage plays an important role in host immune responses to schistosome infection. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by classically activated macrophages (M1 macrophages) is cytotoxic to schistosomula and can prevent hepatic schistosomal fibrosis, while arginase-1 (Arg-1) expressed by alternatively activated macrophages (M2 macrophages) promotes hepatic schistosomal fibrosis. However, the dynamics of macrophage polarization, as well as the possible factors that regulate macrophage polarization, during schistosome infection remain unclear. Methods We first analyzed M1 and M2-phenotypic markers of peritoneal macrophages from mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum (S. japonicum) at indicated time points using flow cytometry (FCM) analysis and real-time PCR. Then we treated peritoneal macrophages from normal mice with schistosome worm antigen (SWA) or schistosome soluble egg antigen (SEA) and determined M1 and M2-phenotypic markers, in order to identify macrophage polarization in responding to schistosomal antigens. Results In this study, we showed that macrophages were preferentially differentiated into the M1 subtype during the acute stage of S. japonicum infection. However, the level of M1 macrophages decreased and M2 macrophages significantly increased during the chronic stage of infection. Furthermore, we showed that SWA favors the generation of M1 macrophages, whereas SEA preferentially promotes M2-polarized phenotype. Conclusion These findings not only reveal the parasite antigen-driven dynamic changes in macrophage polarization, but also suggest that manipulation of macrophage polarization may be of therapeutic benefit in controlling excessive hepatic granulomas and fibrosis in the host with schistosomiasis.
format Article
id doaj-art-b00a9f5feb094292a2f21e8f295c9d0b
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1756-3305
language English
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b00a9f5feb094292a2f21e8f295c9d0b2025-08-19T22:03:35ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052014-03-01711910.1186/1756-3305-7-122Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in miceJifeng Zhu0Zhipeng Xu1Xiaojun Chen2Sha Zhou3Weiwei Zhang4Ying Chi5Wei Li6Xian Song7Feng Liu8Chuan Su9Department of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityKey Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Ministry of Health, Institute of Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and ControlDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pathogen Biology, Nanjing Medical UniversityAbstract Background Schistosome eggs are trapped in host liver and elicit severe hepatic granulomatous inflammation, which can lead to periportal fibrosis, portal hypertension, hemorrhage, or even death in the host. It was reported that the macrophage plays an important role in host immune responses to schistosome infection. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by classically activated macrophages (M1 macrophages) is cytotoxic to schistosomula and can prevent hepatic schistosomal fibrosis, while arginase-1 (Arg-1) expressed by alternatively activated macrophages (M2 macrophages) promotes hepatic schistosomal fibrosis. However, the dynamics of macrophage polarization, as well as the possible factors that regulate macrophage polarization, during schistosome infection remain unclear. Methods We first analyzed M1 and M2-phenotypic markers of peritoneal macrophages from mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum (S. japonicum) at indicated time points using flow cytometry (FCM) analysis and real-time PCR. Then we treated peritoneal macrophages from normal mice with schistosome worm antigen (SWA) or schistosome soluble egg antigen (SEA) and determined M1 and M2-phenotypic markers, in order to identify macrophage polarization in responding to schistosomal antigens. Results In this study, we showed that macrophages were preferentially differentiated into the M1 subtype during the acute stage of S. japonicum infection. However, the level of M1 macrophages decreased and M2 macrophages significantly increased during the chronic stage of infection. Furthermore, we showed that SWA favors the generation of M1 macrophages, whereas SEA preferentially promotes M2-polarized phenotype. Conclusion These findings not only reveal the parasite antigen-driven dynamic changes in macrophage polarization, but also suggest that manipulation of macrophage polarization may be of therapeutic benefit in controlling excessive hepatic granulomas and fibrosis in the host with schistosomiasis.https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-122Schistosoma japonicumLiver fibrosisMacrophage polarizationSchistosomal antigen
spellingShingle Jifeng Zhu
Zhipeng Xu
Xiaojun Chen
Sha Zhou
Weiwei Zhang
Ying Chi
Wei Li
Xian Song
Feng Liu
Chuan Su
Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
Schistosoma japonicum
Liver fibrosis
Macrophage polarization
Schistosomal antigen
title Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
title_full Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
title_fullStr Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
title_full_unstemmed Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
title_short Parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
title_sort parasitic antigens alter macrophage polarization during schistosoma japonicum infection in mice
topic Schistosoma japonicum
Liver fibrosis
Macrophage polarization
Schistosomal antigen
url https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-122
work_keys_str_mv AT jifengzhu parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT zhipengxu parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT xiaojunchen parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT shazhou parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT weiweizhang parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT yingchi parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT weili parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT xiansong parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT fengliu parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice
AT chuansu parasiticantigensaltermacrophagepolarizationduringschistosomajaponicuminfectioninmice