«Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology

The article focuses on the two concepts that have become increasingly common in the official discourse of the EU in recent years – “strategic sovereignty” and “strategic autonomy”. Top public officials, politicians and bodies of the European Union and of member states refer to each of these terms, d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Современная Европа
Main Author: Gleb V. Kotsur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Europe 2023-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sov-europe.ru/images/pdf/2023/3-2023/Kotsur-3-23.pdf
_version_ 1849742571903909888
author Gleb V. Kotsur
author_facet Gleb V. Kotsur
author_sort Gleb V. Kotsur
collection DOAJ
container_title Современная Европа
description The article focuses on the two concepts that have become increasingly common in the official discourse of the EU in recent years – “strategic sovereignty” and “strategic autonomy”. Top public officials, politicians and bodies of the European Union and of member states refer to each of these terms, depending on the circumstances or the established tradition of using the concept in a particular area of the EU's policy. However, there is still no clear understanding in the academic and expert community of how they relate at the semantic level ‒ in other words, whether these terms are interchangeable with regard to their meaning, adjacent ones or they differ radically from each other. The author uses the morphological analysis of ideology by M. Freeden with the special emphasis on the process of decontestation as a theoretical and methodological framework of the study in order to compare these two concepts and discover their semantic content. The empirical evidence of the article includes speeches of EU’s top public officials, politicians, as well as key documents of the EU during the period of active dissemination of concepts in the discourse of Brussels. The analysis reveals that the two concepts occupy related semantic positions, but they are not completely synonymous. It is difficult to predict the further evolution of the concepts within the EU’s semantic system, but they have already taken an important place in the foreign policy discourse of Brussels that will inevitably affect all the EU counterparties, including Russia.
format Article
id doaj-art-b1a56d748ae1415791df934334b94de4
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0201-7083
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Europe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b1a56d748ae1415791df934334b94de42025-08-20T01:45:24ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Institute of EuropeСовременная Европа0201-70832023-06-013334410.31857/S0201708323030038«Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of IdeologyGleb V. Kotsur0St. Petersburg State UniversityThe article focuses on the two concepts that have become increasingly common in the official discourse of the EU in recent years – “strategic sovereignty” and “strategic autonomy”. Top public officials, politicians and bodies of the European Union and of member states refer to each of these terms, depending on the circumstances or the established tradition of using the concept in a particular area of the EU's policy. However, there is still no clear understanding in the academic and expert community of how they relate at the semantic level ‒ in other words, whether these terms are interchangeable with regard to their meaning, adjacent ones or they differ radically from each other. The author uses the morphological analysis of ideology by M. Freeden with the special emphasis on the process of decontestation as a theoretical and methodological framework of the study in order to compare these two concepts and discover their semantic content. The empirical evidence of the article includes speeches of EU’s top public officials, politicians, as well as key documents of the EU during the period of active dissemination of concepts in the discourse of Brussels. The analysis reveals that the two concepts occupy related semantic positions, but they are not completely synonymous. It is difficult to predict the further evolution of the concepts within the EU’s semantic system, but they have already taken an important place in the foreign policy discourse of Brussels that will inevitably affect all the EU counterparties, including Russia.http://www.sov-europe.ru/images/pdf/2023/3-2023/Kotsur-3-23.pdfstrategic sovereigntystrategic autonomyideologyeuropean union
spellingShingle Gleb V. Kotsur
«Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology
strategic sovereignty
strategic autonomy
ideology
european union
title «Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology
title_full «Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology
title_fullStr «Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology
title_full_unstemmed «Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology
title_short «Strategic Sovereignty» and «Strategic Autonomy» in the EU’s Official Discourse: a Morphological Analysis of Ideology
title_sort strategic sovereignty and strategic autonomy in the eu s official discourse a morphological analysis of ideology
topic strategic sovereignty
strategic autonomy
ideology
european union
url http://www.sov-europe.ru/images/pdf/2023/3-2023/Kotsur-3-23.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT glebvkotsur strategicsovereigntyandstrategicautonomyintheeusofficialdiscourseamorphologicalanalysisofideology