Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping

Identifying epitopes, or the segments of a protein that bind to antibodies, is critical for the development of a variety of immunotherapeutics and diagnostics. In vaccine design, the intent is to identify the minimal epitope of an antigen that can elicit an immune response and avoid off-target effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Immunology
Main Authors: Simranjit Grewal, Nidhi Hegde, Stephanie K. Yanow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-09-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1463931/full
_version_ 1850040209647861760
author Simranjit Grewal
Nidhi Hegde
Stephanie K. Yanow
Stephanie K. Yanow
author_facet Simranjit Grewal
Nidhi Hegde
Stephanie K. Yanow
Stephanie K. Yanow
author_sort Simranjit Grewal
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Immunology
description Identifying epitopes, or the segments of a protein that bind to antibodies, is critical for the development of a variety of immunotherapeutics and diagnostics. In vaccine design, the intent is to identify the minimal epitope of an antigen that can elicit an immune response and avoid off-target effects. For prognostics and diagnostics, the epitope-antibody interaction is exploited to measure antigens associated with disease outcomes. Experimental methods such as X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, and peptide arrays are used widely to map epitopes but vary in accuracy, throughput, cost, and feasibility. By comparing machine learning epitope mapping tools, we discuss the importance of data selection, feature design, and algorithm choice in determining the specificity and prediction accuracy of an algorithm. This review discusses limitations of current methods and the potential for machine learning to deepen interpretation and increase feasibility of these methods. We also propose how machine learning can be employed to refine epitope prediction to address the apparent promiscuity of polyreactive antibodies and the challenge of defining conformational epitopes. We highlight the impact of machine learning on our current understanding of epitopes and its potential to guide the design of therapeutic interventions with more predictable outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-b2ad2b4199954cdca0f1273eddb17488
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-3224
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b2ad2b4199954cdca0f1273eddb174882025-08-20T00:32:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242024-09-011510.3389/fimmu.2024.14639311463931Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mappingSimranjit Grewal0Nidhi Hegde1Stephanie K. Yanow2Stephanie K. Yanow3Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaIdentifying epitopes, or the segments of a protein that bind to antibodies, is critical for the development of a variety of immunotherapeutics and diagnostics. In vaccine design, the intent is to identify the minimal epitope of an antigen that can elicit an immune response and avoid off-target effects. For prognostics and diagnostics, the epitope-antibody interaction is exploited to measure antigens associated with disease outcomes. Experimental methods such as X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, and peptide arrays are used widely to map epitopes but vary in accuracy, throughput, cost, and feasibility. By comparing machine learning epitope mapping tools, we discuss the importance of data selection, feature design, and algorithm choice in determining the specificity and prediction accuracy of an algorithm. This review discusses limitations of current methods and the potential for machine learning to deepen interpretation and increase feasibility of these methods. We also propose how machine learning can be employed to refine epitope prediction to address the apparent promiscuity of polyreactive antibodies and the challenge of defining conformational epitopes. We highlight the impact of machine learning on our current understanding of epitopes and its potential to guide the design of therapeutic interventions with more predictable outcomes.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1463931/fullmachine learningepitopeB-cellalgorithmfeaturesdatabases
spellingShingle Simranjit Grewal
Nidhi Hegde
Stephanie K. Yanow
Stephanie K. Yanow
Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
machine learning
epitope
B-cell
algorithm
features
databases
title Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
title_full Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
title_fullStr Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
title_full_unstemmed Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
title_short Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
title_sort integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
topic machine learning
epitope
B-cell
algorithm
features
databases
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1463931/full
work_keys_str_mv AT simranjitgrewal integratingmachinelearningtoadvanceepitopemapping
AT nidhihegde integratingmachinelearningtoadvanceepitopemapping
AT stephaniekyanow integratingmachinelearningtoadvanceepitopemapping
AT stephaniekyanow integratingmachinelearningtoadvanceepitopemapping