Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review

Abstract Claimed detections and nondetections of lightning and related electromagnetic emissions on Venus are qualitatively contradictory. Here, motivated by the commencement of observations by the Akatsuki spacecraft and by studies of future missions, we critically review spacecraft and ground-base...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ralph D. Lorenz
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: SpringerOpen 2018-06-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40645-018-0181-x
_version_ 1852725080411340800
author Ralph D. Lorenz
author_facet Ralph D. Lorenz
author_sort Ralph D. Lorenz
collection DOAJ
container_title Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
description Abstract Claimed detections and nondetections of lightning and related electromagnetic emissions on Venus are qualitatively contradictory. Here, motivated by the commencement of observations by the Akatsuki spacecraft and by studies of future missions, we critically review spacecraft and ground-based observations of the past 40 years, in an attempt to reconcile the discordant reports with a minimal number of assumptions. These include invoking alternative interpretations of individual reports, guided by sensitivity thresholds, controls, and other objective benchmarks of observation integrity. The most compelling evidence is in fact the first, the very low frequency (VLF) radio emissions recorded beneath the clouds by all four of the Veneras 11–13 landers, and those data are re-examined closely, finding power-law amplitude characteristics and substantial differences between the different profiles. It is concluded that some kind of frequent electrical activity is supported by the preponderance of observations, but optical emissions are not consistent with terrestrial levels of activity. Venus’ activity may, like Earth’s, have strong temporal and/or spatial variability, which coupled with the relatively short accumulated observation time for optical measurements, can lead to qualitative discrepancies between observation reports. We note a number of previously unconsidered observations and outline some considerations for future observations.
format Article
id doaj-art-b32fcc9eae4b4e7d8cc74e1b64b8a415
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2197-4284
language English
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b32fcc9eae4b4e7d8cc74e1b64b8a4152025-08-19T21:10:51ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Earth and Planetary Science2197-42842018-06-015112510.1186/s40645-018-0181-xLightning detection on Venus: a critical reviewRalph D. Lorenz0Johns Hopkins Applied Physics LaboratoryAbstract Claimed detections and nondetections of lightning and related electromagnetic emissions on Venus are qualitatively contradictory. Here, motivated by the commencement of observations by the Akatsuki spacecraft and by studies of future missions, we critically review spacecraft and ground-based observations of the past 40 years, in an attempt to reconcile the discordant reports with a minimal number of assumptions. These include invoking alternative interpretations of individual reports, guided by sensitivity thresholds, controls, and other objective benchmarks of observation integrity. The most compelling evidence is in fact the first, the very low frequency (VLF) radio emissions recorded beneath the clouds by all four of the Veneras 11–13 landers, and those data are re-examined closely, finding power-law amplitude characteristics and substantial differences between the different profiles. It is concluded that some kind of frequent electrical activity is supported by the preponderance of observations, but optical emissions are not consistent with terrestrial levels of activity. Venus’ activity may, like Earth’s, have strong temporal and/or spatial variability, which coupled with the relatively short accumulated observation time for optical measurements, can lead to qualitative discrepancies between observation reports. We note a number of previously unconsidered observations and outline some considerations for future observations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40645-018-0181-xVenusLightningElectromagnetic emissionObservation
spellingShingle Ralph D. Lorenz
Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review
Venus
Lightning
Electromagnetic emission
Observation
title Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review
title_full Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review
title_fullStr Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review
title_full_unstemmed Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review
title_short Lightning detection on Venus: a critical review
title_sort lightning detection on venus a critical review
topic Venus
Lightning
Electromagnetic emission
Observation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40645-018-0181-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphdlorenz lightningdetectiononvenusacriticalreview