Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis

Background: The intensive care unit (ICU) is a dynamic environment that necessitates daily clinical decisions regarding organ support treatments. The decision-making process varies significantly between clinicians (i.e. doctors, nurses, and allied healthcare practitioners), even where internationall...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:BJA Open
Main Authors: Kenki Matsumoto, Brigitta Fazzini, Hannah Malcolm, Jack Eldridge, Zudin Puthucheary, Magda Osman, Timothy J. Stephens
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: Elsevier 2025-12-01
主題:
在線閱讀:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625001121
_version_ 1848774846658379776
author Kenki Matsumoto
Brigitta Fazzini
Hannah Malcolm
Jack Eldridge
Zudin Puthucheary
Magda Osman
Timothy J. Stephens
author_facet Kenki Matsumoto
Brigitta Fazzini
Hannah Malcolm
Jack Eldridge
Zudin Puthucheary
Magda Osman
Timothy J. Stephens
author_sort Kenki Matsumoto
collection DOAJ
container_title BJA Open
description Background: The intensive care unit (ICU) is a dynamic environment that necessitates daily clinical decisions regarding organ support treatments. The decision-making process varies significantly between clinicians (i.e. doctors, nurses, and allied healthcare practitioners), even where internationally accepted treatment guidance exists. The factors and the processes influencing clinical decision-making are poorly understood. This systematic review aims to generate a decision-making model by evaluating current evidence on the decision-making process and the factors that affect decisions on organ support treatments in the ICU. Methods: We conducted a systematic search on three databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) including all papers exploring factors that influenced organ support decisions (PROSPERO: CRD42021283290). A mixed-methods meta-synthesis was performed to enable the generation of distinct themes and subthemes used to generate the decision-making model. Results: After screening 8967 records, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mixed-method interpretation of the data found that decision-making can be linear and primarily dictated by patient factors (i.e. patient’s clinical parameters). However, the analysis identified 11 factors that can influence and strain clinician’s decision-making. Four themes: 1) human, 2) team, 3) system, and 4) patient emerged as the potential modifiable factors to optimise the decision-making process. Conclusions: Decision-making surrounding organ support treatment is complex and dynamic. However, there are four distinctive potentially modifiable themes that influence the multidisciplinary decision-making process. Further studies should focus on understanding interventions to improve decision-making and if different decision-making processes directly affect patients’ outcomes. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42021283290).
format Article
id doaj-art-b48a12989a2f4792a4128c19382c7d49
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2772-6096
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b48a12989a2f4792a4128c19382c7d492025-09-27T05:08:40ZengElsevierBJA Open2772-60962025-12-011610048810.1016/j.bjao.2025.100488Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesisKenki Matsumoto0Brigitta Fazzini1Hannah Malcolm2Jack Eldridge3Zudin Puthucheary4Magda Osman5Timothy J. Stephens6Adult Critical Care Unit (ACCU), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, WHRI, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKAdult Critical Care Unit (ACCU), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, WHRI, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Corresponding author.Adult Critical Care Unit (ACCU), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, WHRI, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKAdult Critical Care Unit (ACCU), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, WHRI, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKAdult Critical Care Unit (ACCU), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, WHRI, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKCambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKAdult Critical Care Unit (ACCU), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, WHRI, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKBackground: The intensive care unit (ICU) is a dynamic environment that necessitates daily clinical decisions regarding organ support treatments. The decision-making process varies significantly between clinicians (i.e. doctors, nurses, and allied healthcare practitioners), even where internationally accepted treatment guidance exists. The factors and the processes influencing clinical decision-making are poorly understood. This systematic review aims to generate a decision-making model by evaluating current evidence on the decision-making process and the factors that affect decisions on organ support treatments in the ICU. Methods: We conducted a systematic search on three databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) including all papers exploring factors that influenced organ support decisions (PROSPERO: CRD42021283290). A mixed-methods meta-synthesis was performed to enable the generation of distinct themes and subthemes used to generate the decision-making model. Results: After screening 8967 records, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mixed-method interpretation of the data found that decision-making can be linear and primarily dictated by patient factors (i.e. patient’s clinical parameters). However, the analysis identified 11 factors that can influence and strain clinician’s decision-making. Four themes: 1) human, 2) team, 3) system, and 4) patient emerged as the potential modifiable factors to optimise the decision-making process. Conclusions: Decision-making surrounding organ support treatment is complex and dynamic. However, there are four distinctive potentially modifiable themes that influence the multidisciplinary decision-making process. Further studies should focus on understanding interventions to improve decision-making and if different decision-making processes directly affect patients’ outcomes. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42021283290).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625001121complex decisionsdecision-makingdecision modelmultidisciplinaryorgan support
spellingShingle Kenki Matsumoto
Brigitta Fazzini
Hannah Malcolm
Jack Eldridge
Zudin Puthucheary
Magda Osman
Timothy J. Stephens
Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis
complex decisions
decision-making
decision model
multidisciplinary
organ support
title Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis
title_full Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis
title_fullStr Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis
title_short Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis
title_sort factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision making in the critical care unit a systematic review and mixed methods meta synthesis
topic complex decisions
decision-making
decision model
multidisciplinary
organ support
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625001121
work_keys_str_mv AT kenkimatsumoto factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis
AT brigittafazzini factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis
AT hannahmalcolm factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis
AT jackeldridge factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis
AT zudinputhucheary factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis
AT magdaosman factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis
AT timothyjstephens factorsinfluencingmultidisciplinaryclinicaldecisionmakinginthecriticalcareunitasystematicreviewandmixedmethodsmetasynthesis