Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models

Proximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agriculture
Main Authors: Virginia Strati, Matteo Albéri, Stefano Anconelli, Marica Baldoncini, Marco Bittelli, Carlo Bottardi, Enrico Chiarelli, Barbara Fabbri, Vincenzo Guidi, Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis, Domenico Solimando, Fausto Tomei, Giulia Villani, Fabio Mantovani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/60
_version_ 1852814765467893760
author Virginia Strati
Matteo Albéri
Stefano Anconelli
Marica Baldoncini
Marco Bittelli
Carlo Bottardi
Enrico Chiarelli
Barbara Fabbri
Vincenzo Guidi
Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis
Domenico Solimando
Fausto Tomei
Giulia Villani
Fabio Mantovani
author_facet Virginia Strati
Matteo Albéri
Stefano Anconelli
Marica Baldoncini
Marco Bittelli
Carlo Bottardi
Enrico Chiarelli
Barbara Fabbri
Vincenzo Guidi
Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis
Domenico Solimando
Fausto Tomei
Giulia Villani
Fabio Mantovani
author_sort Virginia Strati
collection DOAJ
container_title Agriculture
description Proximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved the feasibility and reliability of soil water content monitoring through a seven-month continuous acquisition of terrestrial gamma radiation in a tomato test field. By employing a 1 L sodium iodide detector placed at a height of 2.25 m, we investigated the gamma signal coming from an area having a ~25 m radius and from a depth of approximately 30 cm. Experimental values, inferred after a calibration measurement and corrected for the presence of biomass, were corroborated with gravimetric data acquired under different soil moisture conditions, giving an average absolute discrepancy of about 2%. A quantitative comparison was carried out with data simulated by AquaCrop, CRITeRIA, and IRRINET soil–crop system models. The different goodness of fit obtained in bare soil condition and during the vegetated period highlighted that CRITeRIA showed the best agreement with the experimental data over the entire data-taking period while, in presence of the tomato crop, IRRINET provided the best results.
format Article
id doaj-art-b4e2dd0281ea483bb69175f6dd785585
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2077-0472
language English
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b4e2dd0281ea483bb69175f6dd7855852025-08-19T20:34:37ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722018-04-01846010.3390/agriculture8040060agriculture8040060Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System ModelsVirginia Strati0Matteo Albéri1Stefano Anconelli2Marica Baldoncini3Marco Bittelli4Carlo Bottardi5Enrico Chiarelli6Barbara Fabbri7Vincenzo Guidi8Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis9Domenico Solimando10Fausto Tomei11Giulia Villani12Fabio Mantovani13Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyConsorzio Bonifica CER, Via Masi 8, 40137, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyConsorzio Bonifica CER, Via Masi 8, 40137, Bologna, ItalyServizio Idro-Meteo-Clima di Bologna Agenzia Regionale Prevenzione, Ambiente ed Energia, Via Po 5, 40139 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyProximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved the feasibility and reliability of soil water content monitoring through a seven-month continuous acquisition of terrestrial gamma radiation in a tomato test field. By employing a 1 L sodium iodide detector placed at a height of 2.25 m, we investigated the gamma signal coming from an area having a ~25 m radius and from a depth of approximately 30 cm. Experimental values, inferred after a calibration measurement and corrected for the presence of biomass, were corroborated with gravimetric data acquired under different soil moisture conditions, giving an average absolute discrepancy of about 2%. A quantitative comparison was carried out with data simulated by AquaCrop, CRITeRIA, and IRRINET soil–crop system models. The different goodness of fit obtained in bare soil condition and during the vegetated period highlighted that CRITeRIA showed the best agreement with the experimental data over the entire data-taking period while, in presence of the tomato crop, IRRINET provided the best results.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/60soil water contentproximal gamma ray spectroscopysoil–crop system modelsreal-time soil water content monitoringnon-destructive methodsCRITeRIAAquaCropIRRINETtomato crop
spellingShingle Virginia Strati
Matteo Albéri
Stefano Anconelli
Marica Baldoncini
Marco Bittelli
Carlo Bottardi
Enrico Chiarelli
Barbara Fabbri
Vincenzo Guidi
Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis
Domenico Solimando
Fausto Tomei
Giulia Villani
Fabio Mantovani
Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
soil water content
proximal gamma ray spectroscopy
soil–crop system models
real-time soil water content monitoring
non-destructive methods
CRITeRIA
AquaCrop
IRRINET
tomato crop
title Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
title_full Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
title_fullStr Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
title_full_unstemmed Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
title_short Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
title_sort modelling soil water content in a tomato field proximal gamma ray spectroscopy and soil crop system models
topic soil water content
proximal gamma ray spectroscopy
soil–crop system models
real-time soil water content monitoring
non-destructive methods
CRITeRIA
AquaCrop
IRRINET
tomato crop
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/60
work_keys_str_mv AT virginiastrati modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT matteoalberi modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT stefanoanconelli modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT maricabaldoncini modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT marcobittelli modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT carlobottardi modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT enricochiarelli modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT barbarafabbri modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT vincenzoguidi modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT kassandragiuliacristinaraptis modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT domenicosolimando modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT faustotomei modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT giuliavillani modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels
AT fabiomantovani modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels