Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models
Proximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved th...
| Published in: | Agriculture |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-04-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/60 |
| _version_ | 1852814765467893760 |
|---|---|
| author | Virginia Strati Matteo Albéri Stefano Anconelli Marica Baldoncini Marco Bittelli Carlo Bottardi Enrico Chiarelli Barbara Fabbri Vincenzo Guidi Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis Domenico Solimando Fausto Tomei Giulia Villani Fabio Mantovani |
| author_facet | Virginia Strati Matteo Albéri Stefano Anconelli Marica Baldoncini Marco Bittelli Carlo Bottardi Enrico Chiarelli Barbara Fabbri Vincenzo Guidi Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis Domenico Solimando Fausto Tomei Giulia Villani Fabio Mantovani |
| author_sort | Virginia Strati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Agriculture |
| description | Proximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved the feasibility and reliability of soil water content monitoring through a seven-month continuous acquisition of terrestrial gamma radiation in a tomato test field. By employing a 1 L sodium iodide detector placed at a height of 2.25 m, we investigated the gamma signal coming from an area having a ~25 m radius and from a depth of approximately 30 cm. Experimental values, inferred after a calibration measurement and corrected for the presence of biomass, were corroborated with gravimetric data acquired under different soil moisture conditions, giving an average absolute discrepancy of about 2%. A quantitative comparison was carried out with data simulated by AquaCrop, CRITeRIA, and IRRINET soil–crop system models. The different goodness of fit obtained in bare soil condition and during the vegetated period highlighted that CRITeRIA showed the best agreement with the experimental data over the entire data-taking period while, in presence of the tomato crop, IRRINET provided the best results. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b4e2dd0281ea483bb69175f6dd785585 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2077-0472 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-b4e2dd0281ea483bb69175f6dd7855852025-08-19T20:34:37ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722018-04-01846010.3390/agriculture8040060agriculture8040060Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System ModelsVirginia Strati0Matteo Albéri1Stefano Anconelli2Marica Baldoncini3Marco Bittelli4Carlo Bottardi5Enrico Chiarelli6Barbara Fabbri7Vincenzo Guidi8Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis9Domenico Solimando10Fausto Tomei11Giulia Villani12Fabio Mantovani13Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyConsorzio Bonifica CER, Via Masi 8, 40137, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyConsorzio Bonifica CER, Via Masi 8, 40137, Bologna, ItalyServizio Idro-Meteo-Clima di Bologna Agenzia Regionale Prevenzione, Ambiente ed Energia, Via Po 5, 40139 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyProximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved the feasibility and reliability of soil water content monitoring through a seven-month continuous acquisition of terrestrial gamma radiation in a tomato test field. By employing a 1 L sodium iodide detector placed at a height of 2.25 m, we investigated the gamma signal coming from an area having a ~25 m radius and from a depth of approximately 30 cm. Experimental values, inferred after a calibration measurement and corrected for the presence of biomass, were corroborated with gravimetric data acquired under different soil moisture conditions, giving an average absolute discrepancy of about 2%. A quantitative comparison was carried out with data simulated by AquaCrop, CRITeRIA, and IRRINET soil–crop system models. The different goodness of fit obtained in bare soil condition and during the vegetated period highlighted that CRITeRIA showed the best agreement with the experimental data over the entire data-taking period while, in presence of the tomato crop, IRRINET provided the best results.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/60soil water contentproximal gamma ray spectroscopysoil–crop system modelsreal-time soil water content monitoringnon-destructive methodsCRITeRIAAquaCropIRRINETtomato crop |
| spellingShingle | Virginia Strati Matteo Albéri Stefano Anconelli Marica Baldoncini Marco Bittelli Carlo Bottardi Enrico Chiarelli Barbara Fabbri Vincenzo Guidi Kassandra Giulia Cristina Raptis Domenico Solimando Fausto Tomei Giulia Villani Fabio Mantovani Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models soil water content proximal gamma ray spectroscopy soil–crop system models real-time soil water content monitoring non-destructive methods CRITeRIA AquaCrop IRRINET tomato crop |
| title | Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models |
| title_full | Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models |
| title_fullStr | Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models |
| title_short | Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models |
| title_sort | modelling soil water content in a tomato field proximal gamma ray spectroscopy and soil crop system models |
| topic | soil water content proximal gamma ray spectroscopy soil–crop system models real-time soil water content monitoring non-destructive methods CRITeRIA AquaCrop IRRINET tomato crop |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/60 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT virginiastrati modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT matteoalberi modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT stefanoanconelli modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT maricabaldoncini modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT marcobittelli modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT carlobottardi modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT enricochiarelli modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT barbarafabbri modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT vincenzoguidi modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT kassandragiuliacristinaraptis modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT domenicosolimando modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT faustotomei modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT giuliavillani modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels AT fabiomantovani modellingsoilwatercontentinatomatofieldproximalgammarayspectroscopyandsoilcropsystemmodels |
