Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
Genetic association data from national biobanks and large-scale association studies have provided new prospects for understanding the genetic evolution of complex traits and diseases in humans. In turn, genomes from ancient human archaeological remains are now easier than ever to obtain, and provide...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Frontiers in Genetics |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-08-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.703541/full |
| _version_ | 1857064889191759872 |
|---|---|
| author | Evan K. Irving-Pease Rasa Muktupavela Michael Dannemann Fernando Racimo |
| author_facet | Evan K. Irving-Pease Rasa Muktupavela Michael Dannemann Fernando Racimo |
| author_sort | Evan K. Irving-Pease |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Frontiers in Genetics |
| description | Genetic association data from national biobanks and large-scale association studies have provided new prospects for understanding the genetic evolution of complex traits and diseases in humans. In turn, genomes from ancient human archaeological remains are now easier than ever to obtain, and provide a direct window into changes in frequencies of trait-associated alleles in the past. This has generated a new wave of studies aiming to analyse the genetic component of traits in historic and prehistoric times using ancient DNA, and to determine whether any such traits were subject to natural selection. In humans, however, issues about the portability and robustness of complex trait inference across different populations are particularly concerning when predictions are extended to individuals that died thousands of years ago, and for which little, if any, phenotypic validation is possible. In this review, we discuss the advantages of incorporating ancient genomes into studies of trait-associated variants, the need for models that can better accommodate ancient genomes into quantitative genetic frameworks, and the existing limits to inferences about complex trait evolution, particularly with respect to past populations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b8a4e09cee514fc2b2bf8038ec2219f1 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1664-8021 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-b8a4e09cee514fc2b2bf8038ec2219f12025-08-19T19:27:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212021-08-011210.3389/fgene.2021.703541703541Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?Evan K. Irving-Pease0Rasa Muktupavela1Michael Dannemann2Fernando Racimo3Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkLundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCenter for Genomics, Evolution and Medicine, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, EstoniaLundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkGenetic association data from national biobanks and large-scale association studies have provided new prospects for understanding the genetic evolution of complex traits and diseases in humans. In turn, genomes from ancient human archaeological remains are now easier than ever to obtain, and provide a direct window into changes in frequencies of trait-associated alleles in the past. This has generated a new wave of studies aiming to analyse the genetic component of traits in historic and prehistoric times using ancient DNA, and to determine whether any such traits were subject to natural selection. In humans, however, issues about the portability and robustness of complex trait inference across different populations are particularly concerning when predictions are extended to individuals that died thousands of years ago, and for which little, if any, phenotypic validation is possible. In this review, we discuss the advantages of incorporating ancient genomes into studies of trait-associated variants, the need for models that can better accommodate ancient genomes into quantitative genetic frameworks, and the existing limits to inferences about complex trait evolution, particularly with respect to past populations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.703541/fullaDNApaleogeneticsGWASpolygenic adaptationcomplex traits |
| spellingShingle | Evan K. Irving-Pease Rasa Muktupavela Michael Dannemann Fernando Racimo Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution? aDNA paleogenetics GWAS polygenic adaptation complex traits |
| title | Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution? |
| title_full | Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution? |
| title_fullStr | Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution? |
| title_short | Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution? |
| title_sort | quantitative human paleogenetics what can ancient dna tell us about complex trait evolution |
| topic | aDNA paleogenetics GWAS polygenic adaptation complex traits |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.703541/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT evankirvingpease quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution AT rasamuktupavela quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution AT michaeldannemann quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution AT fernandoracimo quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution |
