Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?

Genetic association data from national biobanks and large-scale association studies have provided new prospects for understanding the genetic evolution of complex traits and diseases in humans. In turn, genomes from ancient human archaeological remains are now easier than ever to obtain, and provide...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Frontiers in Genetics
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Evan K. Irving-Pease, Rasa Muktupavela, Michael Dannemann, Fernando Racimo
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.703541/full
_version_ 1857064889191759872
author Evan K. Irving-Pease
Rasa Muktupavela
Michael Dannemann
Fernando Racimo
author_facet Evan K. Irving-Pease
Rasa Muktupavela
Michael Dannemann
Fernando Racimo
author_sort Evan K. Irving-Pease
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Genetics
description Genetic association data from national biobanks and large-scale association studies have provided new prospects for understanding the genetic evolution of complex traits and diseases in humans. In turn, genomes from ancient human archaeological remains are now easier than ever to obtain, and provide a direct window into changes in frequencies of trait-associated alleles in the past. This has generated a new wave of studies aiming to analyse the genetic component of traits in historic and prehistoric times using ancient DNA, and to determine whether any such traits were subject to natural selection. In humans, however, issues about the portability and robustness of complex trait inference across different populations are particularly concerning when predictions are extended to individuals that died thousands of years ago, and for which little, if any, phenotypic validation is possible. In this review, we discuss the advantages of incorporating ancient genomes into studies of trait-associated variants, the need for models that can better accommodate ancient genomes into quantitative genetic frameworks, and the existing limits to inferences about complex trait evolution, particularly with respect to past populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-b8a4e09cee514fc2b2bf8038ec2219f1
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-8021
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-b8a4e09cee514fc2b2bf8038ec2219f12025-08-19T19:27:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212021-08-011210.3389/fgene.2021.703541703541Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?Evan K. Irving-Pease0Rasa Muktupavela1Michael Dannemann2Fernando Racimo3Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkLundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCenter for Genomics, Evolution and Medicine, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, EstoniaLundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkGenetic association data from national biobanks and large-scale association studies have provided new prospects for understanding the genetic evolution of complex traits and diseases in humans. In turn, genomes from ancient human archaeological remains are now easier than ever to obtain, and provide a direct window into changes in frequencies of trait-associated alleles in the past. This has generated a new wave of studies aiming to analyse the genetic component of traits in historic and prehistoric times using ancient DNA, and to determine whether any such traits were subject to natural selection. In humans, however, issues about the portability and robustness of complex trait inference across different populations are particularly concerning when predictions are extended to individuals that died thousands of years ago, and for which little, if any, phenotypic validation is possible. In this review, we discuss the advantages of incorporating ancient genomes into studies of trait-associated variants, the need for models that can better accommodate ancient genomes into quantitative genetic frameworks, and the existing limits to inferences about complex trait evolution, particularly with respect to past populations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.703541/fullaDNApaleogeneticsGWASpolygenic adaptationcomplex traits
spellingShingle Evan K. Irving-Pease
Rasa Muktupavela
Michael Dannemann
Fernando Racimo
Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
aDNA
paleogenetics
GWAS
polygenic adaptation
complex traits
title Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
title_full Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
title_fullStr Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
title_short Quantitative Human Paleogenetics: What can Ancient DNA Tell us About Complex Trait Evolution?
title_sort quantitative human paleogenetics what can ancient dna tell us about complex trait evolution
topic aDNA
paleogenetics
GWAS
polygenic adaptation
complex traits
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.703541/full
work_keys_str_mv AT evankirvingpease quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution
AT rasamuktupavela quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution
AT michaeldannemann quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution
AT fernandoracimo quantitativehumanpaleogeneticswhatcanancientdnatellusaboutcomplextraitevolution