Outcomes of repeat conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases

Introduction and Objectives: Although unlimited sessions of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) may be performed for liver metastases, there is no data indicating when treatment becomes ineffective. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of repeat cTACE sessions for nonres...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:Annals of Hepatology
Main Authors: Kamyar Ghabili, Austin-Marley Windham-Herman, Menelaos Konstantinidis, Nikitha Murali, Tabea Borde, Lucas C. Adam, Fabian Laage-Gaupp, MingDe Lin, Julius Chapiro, Christos Georgiades, Nariman Nezami
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: Elsevier 2024-11-01
主題:
在線閱讀:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268124003235
實物特徵
總結:Introduction and Objectives: Although unlimited sessions of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) may be performed for liver metastases, there is no data indicating when treatment becomes ineffective. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of repeat cTACE sessions for nonresponding patients before abandoning cTACE in patients with liver metastases. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective, single-institutional analysis, patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET), colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and lung cancer who underwent consecutive cTACE sessions from 2001 to 2015 were studied. Quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria were utilized for response assessment. The association between the number of cTACE and 2-year, 5-year, and overall survival was evaluated to estimate the optimal number of cTACE for each survival outcome. Results: Eighty-five patients underwent a total of 186 cTACE sessions for 117 liver metastases, of which 30.7 % responded to the first cTACE. For the target lesions that did not respond to the first, second, and third cTACE sessions, response rates after the second, third, and fourth cTACE sessions were 33.3 %, 23 %, and 25 %, respectively. The fourth cTACE session was the optimal number for 2-year survival (HR 0.40; 95 %CI: 0.16–0.97; p = 0.04), 5-year survival (HR 0.31; 95 %CI: 0.11–0.87; p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.13–0.89; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Repeat cTACE in the management of liver metastases from NET, CRC, and lung cancer was associated with improved patient survival. We recommend at least four cTACE sessions before switching to another treatment for nonresponding metastatic liver lesions.
ISSN:1665-2681