Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions

Abstract Animal pollinators are vital for the reproduction of ~90% of flowering plants. However, many of these pollinating species are experiencing declines globally, making effective pollinator monitoring methods more important than ever before. Pollinators can leave DNA on the flowers they visit,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental DNA
Main Authors: Joshua P. Newton, Philip W. Bateman, Matthew J. Heydenrych, Joshua H. Kestel, Kingsley W. Dixon, Kit S. Prendergast, Nicole E. White, Paul Nevill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.399
_version_ 1850423539699548160
author Joshua P. Newton
Philip W. Bateman
Matthew J. Heydenrych
Joshua H. Kestel
Kingsley W. Dixon
Kit S. Prendergast
Nicole E. White
Paul Nevill
author_facet Joshua P. Newton
Philip W. Bateman
Matthew J. Heydenrych
Joshua H. Kestel
Kingsley W. Dixon
Kit S. Prendergast
Nicole E. White
Paul Nevill
author_sort Joshua P. Newton
collection DOAJ
container_title Environmental DNA
description Abstract Animal pollinators are vital for the reproduction of ~90% of flowering plants. However, many of these pollinating species are experiencing declines globally, making effective pollinator monitoring methods more important than ever before. Pollinators can leave DNA on the flowers they visit, and metabarcoding of these environmental DNA (eDNA) traces provides an opportunity to detect the presence of flower visitors. Our study, collecting flowers from seven plant species with diverse floral morphologies, for eDNA metabarcoding analysis, illustrated the value of this novel survey tool. eDNA metabarcoding using three assays, including one developed in this study to target common bush birds, recorded more animal species visiting flowers than visual surveys conducted concurrently, including birds, bees, and other species. We also recorded the presence of a flower visit from a western pygmy possum; to our knowledge this is the first eDNA metabarcoding study to simultaneously identify the interaction of insect, mammal, and bird species with flowers. The highest diversity of taxa was detected on large inflorescence flower types found on Banksia arborea and Grevillea georgeana. The study demonstrates that the ease of sample collection and the robustness of the metabarcoding methodology has profound implications for future management of biodiversity, allowing us to monitor both plants and their attendant cohort of potential pollinators. This opens avenues for rapid and efficient comparison of biodiversity and ecosystem health between different sites and may provide insights into surrogate pollinators in the event of pollinator declines.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb5ea6e50aeb4daf9eccd5aef4da59b5
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2637-4943
language English
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-bb5ea6e50aeb4daf9eccd5aef4da59b52025-08-19T22:41:35ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432023-05-015348850210.1002/edn3.399Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactionsJoshua P. Newton0Philip W. Bateman1Matthew J. Heydenrych2Joshua H. Kestel3Kingsley W. Dixon4Kit S. Prendergast5Nicole E. White6Paul Nevill7Minesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) Research Group, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaMinesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) Research Group, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaTrace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaMinesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) Research Group, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaARC Centre for Mine Site Restoration, School of Molecular and Life Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaBehavioural Ecology Lab, School of Molecular and Life Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaTrace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaMinesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) Research Group, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia AustraliaAbstract Animal pollinators are vital for the reproduction of ~90% of flowering plants. However, many of these pollinating species are experiencing declines globally, making effective pollinator monitoring methods more important than ever before. Pollinators can leave DNA on the flowers they visit, and metabarcoding of these environmental DNA (eDNA) traces provides an opportunity to detect the presence of flower visitors. Our study, collecting flowers from seven plant species with diverse floral morphologies, for eDNA metabarcoding analysis, illustrated the value of this novel survey tool. eDNA metabarcoding using three assays, including one developed in this study to target common bush birds, recorded more animal species visiting flowers than visual surveys conducted concurrently, including birds, bees, and other species. We also recorded the presence of a flower visit from a western pygmy possum; to our knowledge this is the first eDNA metabarcoding study to simultaneously identify the interaction of insect, mammal, and bird species with flowers. The highest diversity of taxa was detected on large inflorescence flower types found on Banksia arborea and Grevillea georgeana. The study demonstrates that the ease of sample collection and the robustness of the metabarcoding methodology has profound implications for future management of biodiversity, allowing us to monitor both plants and their attendant cohort of potential pollinators. This opens avenues for rapid and efficient comparison of biodiversity and ecosystem health between different sites and may provide insights into surrogate pollinators in the event of pollinator declines.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.399avian metabarcoding assayinsect eDNAplant–animal interactionspollinationvertebrate eDNA
spellingShingle Joshua P. Newton
Philip W. Bateman
Matthew J. Heydenrych
Joshua H. Kestel
Kingsley W. Dixon
Kit S. Prendergast
Nicole E. White
Paul Nevill
Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions
avian metabarcoding assay
insect eDNA
plant–animal interactions
pollination
vertebrate eDNA
title Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions
title_full Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions
title_fullStr Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions
title_short Monitoring the birds and the bees: Environmental DNA metabarcoding of flowers detects plant–animal interactions
title_sort monitoring the birds and the bees environmental dna metabarcoding of flowers detects plant animal interactions
topic avian metabarcoding assay
insect eDNA
plant–animal interactions
pollination
vertebrate eDNA
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.399
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuapnewton monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT philipwbateman monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT matthewjheydenrych monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT joshuahkestel monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT kingsleywdixon monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT kitsprendergast monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT nicoleewhite monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions
AT paulnevill monitoringthebirdsandthebeesenvironmentaldnametabarcodingofflowersdetectsplantanimalinteractions