Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey

Introduction Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard for assessing mental health. However limited resources may allow the use of only self-report questionnaires. In the context of emergency, such as terrorist attacks, the performance and thresholds of such tools still unclear. Objecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Psychiatry
Main Authors: L. Bertuzzi, C. Vuillermoz, T. El Aarbaoui, M. Héron, L. Aubert, P. Pirard, S. Vandentorren, Y. Motreff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822006733/type/journal_article
_version_ 1850093767942471680
author L. Bertuzzi
C. Vuillermoz
T. El Aarbaoui
M. Héron
L. Aubert
P. Pirard
S. Vandentorren
Y. Motreff
author_facet L. Bertuzzi
C. Vuillermoz
T. El Aarbaoui
M. Héron
L. Aubert
P. Pirard
S. Vandentorren
Y. Motreff
author_sort L. Bertuzzi
collection DOAJ
container_title European Psychiatry
description Introduction Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard for assessing mental health. However limited resources may allow the use of only self-report questionnaires. In the context of emergency, such as terrorist attacks, the performance and thresholds of such tools still unclear. Objectives We investigated the performance of the Posttraumatic stress disorder CheckList Scale (PCL-S) and of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), both compared to the MINI Interview, among civilians and first responders involved in terrorist attacks. Methods The data came from the IMPACTS survey which was conducted from 6-10 months among civilians (N=190) and first responders (N=232) after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region, France. Sensitivity and specificity of the PCL-S and HADS were estimated by the ROC curve, and the optimal threshold was defined using the Youden index. Results Regarding the PCL-S: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.947 and 0.899, and the optimal threshold were 38.5 and 39.5. Regarding the HADS-D: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.908 and 0.617 and the optimal thresholds were 7.5 and 1.5. For the HADS-A for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.823 and 0.717, the optimal threshold were 9.5 and 6.5. Conclusions In the context of a terrorist attack, compared to the MINI, our study underlined satisfactory performance of the PCL-S and the HADS-D in screening for PTSD and depression respectively, while the screening of anxiety using the HADS-A was unsatisfactory. Disclosure No significant relationships.
format Article
id doaj-art-bbd4a7c64dbd4e7b94ce7244d4e3541c
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0924-9338
1778-3585
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-bbd4a7c64dbd4e7b94ce7244d4e3541c2025-08-20T00:07:48ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Psychiatry0924-93381778-35852022-06-0165S262S26310.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.673Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS surveyL. Bertuzzi0C. Vuillermoz1T. El Aarbaoui2M. Héron3L. Aubert4P. Pirard5S. Vandentorren6Y. Motreff7Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSanté publique France, Cire Antilles, Pointe-à-pître, FranceSanté publique France, Direction Des Maladies Non Transmissibles Et Traumatismes, Saint Maurice, FranceSanté publique France, Direction Scientifique Et Internationale, Saint Maurice, FranceSanté publique France, Direction Des Maladies Non Transmissibles Et Traumatismes, Saint Maurice, France Introduction Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard for assessing mental health. However limited resources may allow the use of only self-report questionnaires. In the context of emergency, such as terrorist attacks, the performance and thresholds of such tools still unclear. Objectives We investigated the performance of the Posttraumatic stress disorder CheckList Scale (PCL-S) and of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), both compared to the MINI Interview, among civilians and first responders involved in terrorist attacks. Methods The data came from the IMPACTS survey which was conducted from 6-10 months among civilians (N=190) and first responders (N=232) after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region, France. Sensitivity and specificity of the PCL-S and HADS were estimated by the ROC curve, and the optimal threshold was defined using the Youden index. Results Regarding the PCL-S: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.947 and 0.899, and the optimal threshold were 38.5 and 39.5. Regarding the HADS-D: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.908 and 0.617 and the optimal thresholds were 7.5 and 1.5. For the HADS-A for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.823 and 0.717, the optimal threshold were 9.5 and 6.5. Conclusions In the context of a terrorist attack, compared to the MINI, our study underlined satisfactory performance of the PCL-S and the HADS-D in screening for PTSD and depression respectively, while the screening of anxiety using the HADS-A was unsatisfactory. Disclosure No significant relationships. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822006733/type/journal_articleMental health disordersself-report questionnairesTerrorist attack
spellingShingle L. Bertuzzi
C. Vuillermoz
T. El Aarbaoui
M. Héron
L. Aubert
P. Pirard
S. Vandentorren
Y. Motreff
Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
Mental health disorders
self-report questionnaires
Terrorist attack
title Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
title_full Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
title_fullStr Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
title_short Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
title_sort evaluation of the self reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the january 2015 terrorist attacks in the paris region impacts survey
topic Mental health disorders
self-report questionnaires
Terrorist attack
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822006733/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT lbertuzzi evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT cvuillermoz evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT telaarbaoui evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT mheron evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT laubert evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT ppirard evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT svandentorren evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey
AT ymotreff evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey