Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey
Introduction Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard for assessing mental health. However limited resources may allow the use of only self-report questionnaires. In the context of emergency, such as terrorist attacks, the performance and thresholds of such tools still unclear. Objecti...
| Published in: | European Psychiatry |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2022-06-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822006733/type/journal_article |
| _version_ | 1850093767942471680 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Bertuzzi C. Vuillermoz T. El Aarbaoui M. Héron L. Aubert P. Pirard S. Vandentorren Y. Motreff |
| author_facet | L. Bertuzzi C. Vuillermoz T. El Aarbaoui M. Héron L. Aubert P. Pirard S. Vandentorren Y. Motreff |
| author_sort | L. Bertuzzi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | European Psychiatry |
| description |
Introduction
Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard for assessing mental health. However limited resources may allow the use of only self-report questionnaires. In the context of emergency, such as terrorist attacks, the performance and thresholds of such tools still unclear.
Objectives
We investigated the performance of the Posttraumatic stress disorder CheckList Scale (PCL-S) and of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), both compared to the MINI Interview, among civilians and first responders involved in terrorist attacks.
Methods
The data came from the IMPACTS survey which was conducted from 6-10 months among civilians (N=190) and first responders (N=232) after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region, France. Sensitivity and specificity of the PCL-S and HADS were estimated by the ROC curve, and the optimal threshold was defined using the Youden index.
Results
Regarding the PCL-S: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.947 and 0.899, and the optimal threshold were 38.5 and 39.5. Regarding the HADS-D: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.908 and 0.617 and the optimal thresholds were 7.5 and 1.5. For the HADS-A for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.823 and 0.717, the optimal threshold were 9.5 and 6.5.
Conclusions
In the context of a terrorist attack, compared to the MINI, our study underlined satisfactory performance of the PCL-S and the HADS-D in screening for PTSD and depression respectively, while the screening of anxiety using the HADS-A was unsatisfactory.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bbd4a7c64dbd4e7b94ce7244d4e3541c |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 0924-9338 1778-3585 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-bbd4a7c64dbd4e7b94ce7244d4e3541c2025-08-20T00:07:48ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Psychiatry0924-93381778-35852022-06-0165S262S26310.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.673Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS surveyL. Bertuzzi0C. Vuillermoz1T. El Aarbaoui2M. Héron3L. Aubert4P. Pirard5S. Vandentorren6Y. Motreff7Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, FranceSanté publique France, Cire Antilles, Pointe-à-pître, FranceSanté publique France, Direction Des Maladies Non Transmissibles Et Traumatismes, Saint Maurice, FranceSanté publique France, Direction Scientifique Et Internationale, Saint Maurice, FranceSanté publique France, Direction Des Maladies Non Transmissibles Et Traumatismes, Saint Maurice, France Introduction Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard for assessing mental health. However limited resources may allow the use of only self-report questionnaires. In the context of emergency, such as terrorist attacks, the performance and thresholds of such tools still unclear. Objectives We investigated the performance of the Posttraumatic stress disorder CheckList Scale (PCL-S) and of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), both compared to the MINI Interview, among civilians and first responders involved in terrorist attacks. Methods The data came from the IMPACTS survey which was conducted from 6-10 months among civilians (N=190) and first responders (N=232) after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region, France. Sensitivity and specificity of the PCL-S and HADS were estimated by the ROC curve, and the optimal threshold was defined using the Youden index. Results Regarding the PCL-S: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.947 and 0.899, and the optimal threshold were 38.5 and 39.5. Regarding the HADS-D: for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.908 and 0.617 and the optimal thresholds were 7.5 and 1.5. For the HADS-A for civilians and first responders respectively, the overall AUC was 0.823 and 0.717, the optimal threshold were 9.5 and 6.5. Conclusions In the context of a terrorist attack, compared to the MINI, our study underlined satisfactory performance of the PCL-S and the HADS-D in screening for PTSD and depression respectively, while the screening of anxiety using the HADS-A was unsatisfactory. Disclosure No significant relationships. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822006733/type/journal_articleMental health disordersself-report questionnairesTerrorist attack |
| spellingShingle | L. Bertuzzi C. Vuillermoz T. El Aarbaoui M. Héron L. Aubert P. Pirard S. Vandentorren Y. Motreff Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey Mental health disorders self-report questionnaires Terrorist attack |
| title | Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey |
| title_full | Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey |
| title_short | Evaluation of the self-reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in the Paris Region: IMPACTS survey |
| title_sort | evaluation of the self reported questionnaires used to assess mental health after the january 2015 terrorist attacks in the paris region impacts survey |
| topic | Mental health disorders self-report questionnaires Terrorist attack |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822006733/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lbertuzzi evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT cvuillermoz evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT telaarbaoui evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT mheron evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT laubert evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT ppirard evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT svandentorren evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey AT ymotreff evaluationoftheselfreportedquestionnairesusedtoassessmentalhealthafterthejanuary2015terroristattacksintheparisregionimpactssurvey |
