The egocentric nature of action-sound associations

Actions that produce sounds infuse our daily lives. Some of these sounds are a natural consequence of physical interactions (such as a clang resulting from dropping a pan), but others are artificially designed (such as a beep resulting from a keypress). Although the relationship between actions and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Psychology
Main Authors: Nicole eNavolio, Guillaume J Lemaitre, Alain eForget, Laurie M Heller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00231/full
_version_ 1852799967654051840
author Nicole eNavolio
Nicole eNavolio
Guillaume J Lemaitre
Alain eForget
Laurie M Heller
author_facet Nicole eNavolio
Nicole eNavolio
Guillaume J Lemaitre
Alain eForget
Laurie M Heller
author_sort Nicole eNavolio
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Psychology
description Actions that produce sounds infuse our daily lives. Some of these sounds are a natural consequence of physical interactions (such as a clang resulting from dropping a pan), but others are artificially designed (such as a beep resulting from a keypress). Although the relationship between actions and sounds has previously been examined, the frame of reference of these associations is still unknown, despite it being a fundamental property of a psychological representation. For example, when an association is created between a keypress and a tone, it is unclear whether the frame of reference is egocentric (gesture-sound association) or exocentric (key-sound association). This question is especially important for artificially created associations, which occur in technology that pairs sounds with actions, such as gestural interfaces, virtual or augmented reality, and simple buttons that produce tones. The frame of reference could directly influence the learnability, the ease of use, the extent of immersion, and many other factors of the interaction. To explore whether action-sound associations are egocentric or exocentric, an experiment was implemented using a computer keyboard’s number pad wherein moving a finger from one key to another produced a sound, thus creating an action-sound association. Half of the participants received egocentric instructions to move their finger with a particular gesture. The other half of the participants received exocentric instructions to move their finger to a particular number on the keypad. All participants were performing the same actions, and only the framing of the action varied between conditions by altering task instructions. Participants in the egocentric condition learned the gesture-sound association, as revealed by a priming paradigm. However, the exocentric condition showed no priming effects. This finding suggests that action-sound associations are egocentric in nature. A second part of the same session further confirmed the egocentric nature of these associations by showing no change in the priming effect after moving to a different starting location. Our findings are consistent with an egocentric representation of action-sound associations, which could have implications for applications that utilize these associations.
format Article
id doaj-art-bd30ee87ca2b4db0ae30cb47b5151da0
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-bd30ee87ca2b4db0ae30cb47b5151da02025-08-19T20:40:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-02-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00231171180The egocentric nature of action-sound associationsNicole eNavolio0Nicole eNavolio1Guillaume J Lemaitre2Alain eForget3Laurie M Heller4Carnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityActions that produce sounds infuse our daily lives. Some of these sounds are a natural consequence of physical interactions (such as a clang resulting from dropping a pan), but others are artificially designed (such as a beep resulting from a keypress). Although the relationship between actions and sounds has previously been examined, the frame of reference of these associations is still unknown, despite it being a fundamental property of a psychological representation. For example, when an association is created between a keypress and a tone, it is unclear whether the frame of reference is egocentric (gesture-sound association) or exocentric (key-sound association). This question is especially important for artificially created associations, which occur in technology that pairs sounds with actions, such as gestural interfaces, virtual or augmented reality, and simple buttons that produce tones. The frame of reference could directly influence the learnability, the ease of use, the extent of immersion, and many other factors of the interaction. To explore whether action-sound associations are egocentric or exocentric, an experiment was implemented using a computer keyboard’s number pad wherein moving a finger from one key to another produced a sound, thus creating an action-sound association. Half of the participants received egocentric instructions to move their finger with a particular gesture. The other half of the participants received exocentric instructions to move their finger to a particular number on the keypad. All participants were performing the same actions, and only the framing of the action varied between conditions by altering task instructions. Participants in the egocentric condition learned the gesture-sound association, as revealed by a priming paradigm. However, the exocentric condition showed no priming effects. This finding suggests that action-sound associations are egocentric in nature. A second part of the same session further confirmed the egocentric nature of these associations by showing no change in the priming effect after moving to a different starting location. Our findings are consistent with an egocentric representation of action-sound associations, which could have implications for applications that utilize these associations.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00231/fullAuditory PerceptionprimingGesturesEnvironmental soundsEgocentricExocentric
spellingShingle Nicole eNavolio
Nicole eNavolio
Guillaume J Lemaitre
Alain eForget
Laurie M Heller
The egocentric nature of action-sound associations
Auditory Perception
priming
Gestures
Environmental sounds
Egocentric
Exocentric
title The egocentric nature of action-sound associations
title_full The egocentric nature of action-sound associations
title_fullStr The egocentric nature of action-sound associations
title_full_unstemmed The egocentric nature of action-sound associations
title_short The egocentric nature of action-sound associations
title_sort egocentric nature of action sound associations
topic Auditory Perception
priming
Gestures
Environmental sounds
Egocentric
Exocentric
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00231/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoleenavolio theegocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT nicoleenavolio theegocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT guillaumejlemaitre theegocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT alaineforget theegocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT lauriemheller theegocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT nicoleenavolio egocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT nicoleenavolio egocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT guillaumejlemaitre egocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT alaineforget egocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations
AT lauriemheller egocentricnatureofactionsoundassociations