Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
Objective: To compare the performance of the Urised, an image-based automated urine sediment analyzer, against the manual method in urine sediment analysis. Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in Nove...
| Published in: | Siriraj Medical Journal |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
2020-07-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/243775 |
| _version_ | 1850327321416826880 |
|---|---|
| author | Preenun Jintasuthanont Varanya Khejonnit Nisarat Opaskiattikul Wimol Chinswangwatanakul |
| author_facet | Preenun Jintasuthanont Varanya Khejonnit Nisarat Opaskiattikul Wimol Chinswangwatanakul |
| author_sort | Preenun Jintasuthanont |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Siriraj Medical Journal |
| description | Objective: To compare the performance of the Urised, an image-based automated urine sediment analyzer, against the manual method in urine sediment analysis.
Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in November 2008. One hundred and one urine samples were measured by both automated urine sediment analyzer “Urisedâ€ï¡´ and manual method routinely done in the laboratory. Results from the both methods were compared for their correlation or agreement. Precision, linearity, and carry over of the Urised were also determined.
Results: Urised and the conventional manual examination were in good correlations for the following parameters: red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), crystals, bacteria, and mucus. Although the squamous epithelial cell (SQE) analysed from both methods showed excellent correlation, they were not statistically significant. For pathologic casts, the statistics showed good agreement between the two methods, but the ability to detect pathologic casts of the Urised was less than the manual method. No yeast was found in any specimen included in this study, therefore this parameter could not be evaluated. Poor agreement between both methods for evaluation of small round cell (SRC) and hyaline casts was noted.
Conclusion: Urised was reliable in measurement of some certain urinary parameters such as RBC, WBC, crystals, bacteria, and mucus. However, the examination by experienced technicians was suggested for SRC, hyaline casts, and pathologic casts. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bef8fc90f39747bf82fe2c8a4f5b9334 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2228-8082 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-bef8fc90f39747bf82fe2c8a4f5b93342025-08-19T23:19:52ZengFaculty of Medicine Siriraj HospitalSiriraj Medical Journal2228-80822020-07-01624Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual MethodPreenun Jintasuthanont0 Varanya Khejonnit1 Nisarat Opaskiattikul2Wimol Chinswangwatanakul3Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityObjective: To compare the performance of the Urised, an image-based automated urine sediment analyzer, against the manual method in urine sediment analysis. Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in November 2008. One hundred and one urine samples were measured by both automated urine sediment analyzer “Urisedâ€ï¡´ and manual method routinely done in the laboratory. Results from the both methods were compared for their correlation or agreement. Precision, linearity, and carry over of the Urised were also determined. Results: Urised and the conventional manual examination were in good correlations for the following parameters: red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), crystals, bacteria, and mucus. Although the squamous epithelial cell (SQE) analysed from both methods showed excellent correlation, they were not statistically significant. For pathologic casts, the statistics showed good agreement between the two methods, but the ability to detect pathologic casts of the Urised was less than the manual method. No yeast was found in any specimen included in this study, therefore this parameter could not be evaluated. Poor agreement between both methods for evaluation of small round cell (SRC) and hyaline casts was noted. Conclusion: Urised was reliable in measurement of some certain urinary parameters such as RBC, WBC, crystals, bacteria, and mucus. However, the examination by experienced technicians was suggested for SRC, hyaline casts, and pathologic casts.https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/243775Urine sedimentautomated urine sediment analyzerconventional manual examination |
| spellingShingle | Preenun Jintasuthanont Varanya Khejonnit Nisarat Opaskiattikul Wimol Chinswangwatanakul Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method Urine sediment automated urine sediment analyzer conventional manual examination |
| title | Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method |
| title_full | Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method |
| title_short | Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method |
| title_sort | evaluation of the performance of the automated urine sediment analyzer a€oeuriseda€ compared with the manual method |
| topic | Urine sediment automated urine sediment analyzer conventional manual examination |
| url | https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/243775 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT preenunjintasuthanont evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod AT varanyakhejonnit evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod AT nisaratopaskiattikul evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod AT wimolchinswangwatanakul evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod |
