Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method

Objective: To compare the performance of the Urised, an image-based automated urine sediment analyzer, against the manual method in urine sediment analysis. Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in Nove...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Siriraj Medical Journal
Main Authors: Preenun Jintasuthanont, Varanya Khejonnit, Nisarat Opaskiattikul, Wimol Chinswangwatanakul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 2020-07-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/243775
_version_ 1850327321416826880
author Preenun Jintasuthanont
Varanya Khejonnit
Nisarat Opaskiattikul
Wimol Chinswangwatanakul
author_facet Preenun Jintasuthanont
Varanya Khejonnit
Nisarat Opaskiattikul
Wimol Chinswangwatanakul
author_sort Preenun Jintasuthanont
collection DOAJ
container_title Siriraj Medical Journal
description Objective: To compare the performance of the Urised, an image-based automated urine sediment analyzer, against the manual method in urine sediment analysis. Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in November 2008. One hundred and one urine samples were measured by both automated urine sediment analyzer “Urisedâ€ï¡´ and manual method routinely done in the laboratory. Results from the both methods were compared for their correlation or agreement. Precision, linearity, and carry over of the Urised were also determined. Results: Urised and the conventional manual examination were in good correlations for the following parameters: red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), crystals, bacteria, and mucus. Although the squamous epithelial cell (SQE) analysed from both methods showed excellent correlation, they were not statistically significant. For pathologic casts, the statistics showed good agreement between the two methods, but the ability to detect pathologic casts of the Urised was less than the manual method. No yeast was found in any specimen included in this study, therefore this parameter could not be evaluated. Poor agreement between both methods for evaluation of small round cell (SRC) and hyaline casts was noted. Conclusion: Urised was reliable in measurement of some certain urinary parameters such as RBC, WBC, crystals, bacteria, and mucus. However, the examination by experienced technicians was suggested for SRC, hyaline casts, and pathologic casts.
format Article
id doaj-art-bef8fc90f39747bf82fe2c8a4f5b9334
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2228-8082
language English
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-bef8fc90f39747bf82fe2c8a4f5b93342025-08-19T23:19:52ZengFaculty of Medicine Siriraj HospitalSiriraj Medical Journal2228-80822020-07-01624Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual MethodPreenun Jintasuthanont0 Varanya Khejonnit1 Nisarat Opaskiattikul2Wimol Chinswangwatanakul3Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityObjective: To compare the performance of the Urised, an image-based automated urine sediment analyzer, against the manual method in urine sediment analysis. Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in November 2008. One hundred and one urine samples were measured by both automated urine sediment analyzer “Urisedâ€ï¡´ and manual method routinely done in the laboratory. Results from the both methods were compared for their correlation or agreement. Precision, linearity, and carry over of the Urised were also determined. Results: Urised and the conventional manual examination were in good correlations for the following parameters: red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), crystals, bacteria, and mucus. Although the squamous epithelial cell (SQE) analysed from both methods showed excellent correlation, they were not statistically significant. For pathologic casts, the statistics showed good agreement between the two methods, but the ability to detect pathologic casts of the Urised was less than the manual method. No yeast was found in any specimen included in this study, therefore this parameter could not be evaluated. Poor agreement between both methods for evaluation of small round cell (SRC) and hyaline casts was noted. Conclusion: Urised was reliable in measurement of some certain urinary parameters such as RBC, WBC, crystals, bacteria, and mucus. However, the examination by experienced technicians was suggested for SRC, hyaline casts, and pathologic casts.https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/243775Urine sedimentautomated urine sediment analyzerconventional manual examination
spellingShingle Preenun Jintasuthanont
Varanya Khejonnit
Nisarat Opaskiattikul
Wimol Chinswangwatanakul
Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
Urine sediment
automated urine sediment analyzer
conventional manual examination
title Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
title_full Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
title_short Evaluation of the Performance of the Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer “Urised†Compared with the Manual Method
title_sort evaluation of the performance of the automated urine sediment analyzer a€oeuriseda€ compared with the manual method
topic Urine sediment
automated urine sediment analyzer
conventional manual examination
url https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/243775
work_keys_str_mv AT preenunjintasuthanont evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod
AT varanyakhejonnit evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod
AT nisaratopaskiattikul evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod
AT wimolchinswangwatanakul evaluationoftheperformanceoftheautomatedurinesedimentanalyzeraœurisedacomparedwiththemanualmethod