Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center
Introduction: Slow patient accrual in cancer clinical trials is always a concern. In 2021, the University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center (KUCC), an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center, implemented the Curated Cancer Clinical Outcomes Database (C3OD) to perform trial feasibility analyse...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , , , , , , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Elsevier
2024-04-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000280 |
| _version_ | 1850330277735301120 |
|---|---|
| author | Xiaosong Shi Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam Jo A. Wick David Streeter Jeffrey A. Thompson Natalie R. Streeter Tara L. Lin Joseph Hines, II Matthew S. Mayo Byron J. Gajewski |
| author_facet | Xiaosong Shi Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam Jo A. Wick David Streeter Jeffrey A. Thompson Natalie R. Streeter Tara L. Lin Joseph Hines, II Matthew S. Mayo Byron J. Gajewski |
| author_sort | Xiaosong Shi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
| description | Introduction: Slow patient accrual in cancer clinical trials is always a concern. In 2021, the University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center (KUCC), an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center, implemented the Curated Cancer Clinical Outcomes Database (C3OD) to perform trial feasibility analyses using real-time electronic medical record data. In this study, we proposed a Bayesian hierarchical model to evaluate annual cancer clinical trial accrual performance. Methods: The Bayesian hierarchical model uses Poisson models to describe the accrual performance of individual cancer clinical trials and a hierarchical component to describe the variation in performance across studies. Additionally, this model evaluates the impacts of the C3OD and the COVID-19 pandemic using posterior probabilities across evaluation years. The performance metric is the ratio of the observed accrual rate to the target accrual rate. Results: Posterior medians of the annual accrual performance at the KUCC from 2018 to 2023 are 0.233, 0.246, 0.197, 0.150, 0.254, and 0.340. The COVID-19 pandemic partly explains the drop in performance in 2020 and 2021. The posterior probability that annual accrual performance is better with C3OD in 2023 than pre-pandemic (2019) is 0.935. Conclusions: This study comprehensively evaluates the annual performance of clinical trial accrual at the KUCC, revealing a negative impact of COVID-19 and an ongoing positive impact of C3OD implementation. Two sensitivity analyses further validate the robustness of our model. Evaluating annual accrual performance across clinical trials is essential for a cancer center. The performance evaluation tools described in this paper are highly recommended for monitoring clinical trial accrual. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c8d834bc4d1745538693cf8d7aeec80e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2451-8654 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-c8d834bc4d1745538693cf8d7aeec80e2025-08-19T23:18:29ZengElsevierContemporary Clinical Trials Communications2451-86542024-04-013810128110.1016/j.conctc.2024.101281Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer centerXiaosong Shi0Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam1Jo A. Wick2David Streeter3Jeffrey A. Thompson4Natalie R. Streeter5Tara L. Lin6Joseph Hines, II7Matthew S. Mayo8Byron J. Gajewski9Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; Corresponding author. Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard Mail Stop 1026, Kansas City, 66160, KS, USA.Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USADepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USADepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USADepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USAUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; Clinical Trials Office, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Fairway, KS, USAUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; Clinical Trials Office, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Fairway, KS, USA; Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, USAUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; Clinical Trials Office, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Fairway, KS, USADepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USADepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USAIntroduction: Slow patient accrual in cancer clinical trials is always a concern. In 2021, the University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center (KUCC), an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center, implemented the Curated Cancer Clinical Outcomes Database (C3OD) to perform trial feasibility analyses using real-time electronic medical record data. In this study, we proposed a Bayesian hierarchical model to evaluate annual cancer clinical trial accrual performance. Methods: The Bayesian hierarchical model uses Poisson models to describe the accrual performance of individual cancer clinical trials and a hierarchical component to describe the variation in performance across studies. Additionally, this model evaluates the impacts of the C3OD and the COVID-19 pandemic using posterior probabilities across evaluation years. The performance metric is the ratio of the observed accrual rate to the target accrual rate. Results: Posterior medians of the annual accrual performance at the KUCC from 2018 to 2023 are 0.233, 0.246, 0.197, 0.150, 0.254, and 0.340. The COVID-19 pandemic partly explains the drop in performance in 2020 and 2021. The posterior probability that annual accrual performance is better with C3OD in 2023 than pre-pandemic (2019) is 0.935. Conclusions: This study comprehensively evaluates the annual performance of clinical trial accrual at the KUCC, revealing a negative impact of COVID-19 and an ongoing positive impact of C3OD implementation. Two sensitivity analyses further validate the robustness of our model. Evaluating annual accrual performance across clinical trials is essential for a cancer center. The performance evaluation tools described in this paper are highly recommended for monitoring clinical trial accrual.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000280Patient recruitmentPerformance assessmentBayesian methods |
| spellingShingle | Xiaosong Shi Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam Jo A. Wick David Streeter Jeffrey A. Thompson Natalie R. Streeter Tara L. Lin Joseph Hines, II Matthew S. Mayo Byron J. Gajewski Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center Patient recruitment Performance assessment Bayesian methods |
| title | Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center |
| title_full | Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center |
| title_fullStr | Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center |
| title_full_unstemmed | Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center |
| title_short | Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center |
| title_sort | using bayesian hierarchical modeling for performance evaluation of clinical trial accrual for a cancer center |
| topic | Patient recruitment Performance assessment Bayesian methods |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424000280 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaosongshi usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT dineshpalmudaranthakam usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT joawick usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT davidstreeter usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT jeffreyathompson usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT natalierstreeter usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT tarallin usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT josephhinesii usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT matthewsmayo usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter AT byronjgajewski usingbayesianhierarchicalmodelingforperformanceevaluationofclinicaltrialaccrualforacancercenter |
