Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal

The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to conduct a situational analysis, and second, to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of broiler poultry farmers (BPF) regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Data were collected from 500 BPF across 40 distr...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Animals
主要な著者: Manoj Kumar Shahi, Tulsi Ram Gompo, Sumit Sharma, Bishal Pokhrel, Srijana Manandhar, Saharuetai Jeamsripong
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/19/3135
_version_ 1851910437535219712
author Manoj Kumar Shahi
Tulsi Ram Gompo
Sumit Sharma
Bishal Pokhrel
Srijana Manandhar
Saharuetai Jeamsripong
author_facet Manoj Kumar Shahi
Tulsi Ram Gompo
Sumit Sharma
Bishal Pokhrel
Srijana Manandhar
Saharuetai Jeamsripong
author_sort Manoj Kumar Shahi
collection DOAJ
container_title Animals
description The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to conduct a situational analysis, and second, to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of broiler poultry farmers (BPF) regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Data were collected from 500 BPF across 40 districts, representing 88.1% of Nepal’s broiler poultry population. Among these farmers, 81.0% were male, 59.6% had up to 4 years of experience in poultry farming, and 50.8% had completed at least a high school education. The most used antimicrobials on the farms were doxycycline (23.5%), neomycin (17.1%), and colistin sulfate (9.6%) out of 27 reported antimicrobials. While the BPF exhibited limited knowledge (62.6%) and practice (55.5%) related to AMU and AMR, their overall attitude toward these issues was positive (91.6%). This study also identified significant factors influencing farmers’ attitudes toward AMU and AMR. Farmers aged 31–40 showed a stronger inclination compared to other age groups (OR = 4.2, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and those using antimicrobials for preventive purposes had a more favorable attitude compared to those using them for other purposes (OR = 5.9, <i>p</i> = 0.02). In light of these findings, this study recommends the implementation of effective regulatory measures for drug usage, along with awareness programs addressing AMU and AMR to address the issue of AMR in poultry production.
format Article
id doaj-art-c92b6b6ff2cc47c7b34e8b6f7054c19d
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2076-2615
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-c92b6b6ff2cc47c7b34e8b6f7054c19d2025-08-19T22:02:11ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-10-011319313510.3390/ani13193135Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in NepalManoj Kumar Shahi0Tulsi Ram Gompo1Sumit Sharma2Bishal Pokhrel3Srijana Manandhar4Saharuetai Jeamsripong5Nepal Veterinary Council, Tripureshwor, Kathmandu 4600, NepalCentral Veterinary Laboratory, Tripureshwar, Kathmandu 44600, NepalNepal Veterinary Council, Tripureshwor, Kathmandu 4600, NepalNepal Veterinary Council, Tripureshwor, Kathmandu 4600, NepalNepal Veterinary Council, Tripureshwor, Kathmandu 4600, NepalDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Henri-Dunant Rd., Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, ThailandThe purpose of this study was twofold: first, to conduct a situational analysis, and second, to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of broiler poultry farmers (BPF) regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Data were collected from 500 BPF across 40 districts, representing 88.1% of Nepal’s broiler poultry population. Among these farmers, 81.0% were male, 59.6% had up to 4 years of experience in poultry farming, and 50.8% had completed at least a high school education. The most used antimicrobials on the farms were doxycycline (23.5%), neomycin (17.1%), and colistin sulfate (9.6%) out of 27 reported antimicrobials. While the BPF exhibited limited knowledge (62.6%) and practice (55.5%) related to AMU and AMR, their overall attitude toward these issues was positive (91.6%). This study also identified significant factors influencing farmers’ attitudes toward AMU and AMR. Farmers aged 31–40 showed a stronger inclination compared to other age groups (OR = 4.2, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and those using antimicrobials for preventive purposes had a more favorable attitude compared to those using them for other purposes (OR = 5.9, <i>p</i> = 0.02). In light of these findings, this study recommends the implementation of effective regulatory measures for drug usage, along with awareness programs addressing AMU and AMR to address the issue of AMR in poultry production.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/19/3135antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial usebroiler poultry farmerKAPNepal
spellingShingle Manoj Kumar Shahi
Tulsi Ram Gompo
Sumit Sharma
Bishal Pokhrel
Srijana Manandhar
Saharuetai Jeamsripong
Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal
antimicrobial resistance
antimicrobial use
broiler poultry farmer
KAP
Nepal
title Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal
title_full Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal
title_fullStr Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal
title_short Situational Analysis and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Broiler Poultry Farmers in Nepal
title_sort situational analysis and knowledge attitudes and practices of antimicrobial use and resistance among broiler poultry farmers in nepal
topic antimicrobial resistance
antimicrobial use
broiler poultry farmer
KAP
Nepal
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/19/3135
work_keys_str_mv AT manojkumarshahi situationalanalysisandknowledgeattitudesandpracticesofantimicrobialuseandresistanceamongbroilerpoultryfarmersinnepal
AT tulsiramgompo situationalanalysisandknowledgeattitudesandpracticesofantimicrobialuseandresistanceamongbroilerpoultryfarmersinnepal
AT sumitsharma situationalanalysisandknowledgeattitudesandpracticesofantimicrobialuseandresistanceamongbroilerpoultryfarmersinnepal
AT bishalpokhrel situationalanalysisandknowledgeattitudesandpracticesofantimicrobialuseandresistanceamongbroilerpoultryfarmersinnepal
AT srijanamanandhar situationalanalysisandknowledgeattitudesandpracticesofantimicrobialuseandresistanceamongbroilerpoultryfarmersinnepal
AT saharuetaijeamsripong situationalanalysisandknowledgeattitudesandpracticesofantimicrobialuseandresistanceamongbroilerpoultryfarmersinnepal