Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations

Abstract Dual‐source remotely sensed evapotranspiration (ET) models require accurate separation of soil evaporation (Es), plant transpiration (Ec), and precipitation interception (Ei) based on soil and canopy resistances. Despite the availability of several ET products and algorithms, comprehensive...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Water Resources Research
主要な著者: Jinfeng Zhao, Shikun Sun, Yali Yin, Yihe Tang, Chong Li, Yongshan Liang, Yubao Wang, Alexander Winkler, Shijie Jiang
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Wiley 2025-06-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039252
_version_ 1849447091443597312
author Jinfeng Zhao
Shikun Sun
Yali Yin
Yihe Tang
Chong Li
Yongshan Liang
Yubao Wang
Alexander Winkler
Shijie Jiang
author_facet Jinfeng Zhao
Shikun Sun
Yali Yin
Yihe Tang
Chong Li
Yongshan Liang
Yubao Wang
Alexander Winkler
Shijie Jiang
author_sort Jinfeng Zhao
collection DOAJ
container_title Water Resources Research
description Abstract Dual‐source remotely sensed evapotranspiration (ET) models require accurate separation of soil evaporation (Es), plant transpiration (Ec), and precipitation interception (Ei) based on soil and canopy resistances. Despite the availability of several ET products and algorithms, comprehensive evaluations of resistance configurations remain scarce. This study systematically evaluates various combinations of five soil resistance methods, eight canopy resistance methods, and two precipitation interception algorithms within the Shuttleworth‐Wallace (S‐W) framework. Using eddy covariance data from 119 FLUXNET sites and the latest ET products, we find that the Ball‐Berry‐Leuning method, unified stomatal method, and RL empirical method provide comparable and top‐ranked performance across plant functional types (PFTs) and climate zones, with only a single free parameter calibrated by genetic algorithm. The power function method (S2), sensitive to soil surface water content proves to be the most effective for modeling Es, particularly in water‐limited regions. The performance of best‐performing but unexplored combinations (S2‐C1, S2‐C2, S2‐C5) is consistent with PML‐V2, GLEAM4, and underlying water use efficiency model, explaining 56% of the variation in daily ET and achieving an root mean square error as low as 1.02 mm day−1. However, these models show reduced accuracy in arid zones, where prolonged water stress led to a 38% reduction in R2. This highlights the need for a more accurate representation of soil moisture stress in arid regions, which is often overlooked in existing models. Our study offers robust, parsimonious, and broadly applicable models for ET estimation across PFTs and climate zones.
format Article
id doaj-art-cc28ca0448e747b6a4e7948ec0a0a648
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-cc28ca0448e747b6a4e7948ec0a0a6482025-08-20T03:29:48ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732025-06-01616n/an/a10.1029/2024WR039252Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance CombinationsJinfeng Zhao0Shikun Sun1Yali Yin2Yihe Tang3Chong Li4Yongshan Liang5Yubao Wang6Alexander Winkler7Shijie Jiang8Key Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education Northwest A&F University Yangling P. R. ChinaDepartment for Biogeochemical Integration Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena GermanyDepartment for Biogeochemical Integration Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena GermanyAbstract Dual‐source remotely sensed evapotranspiration (ET) models require accurate separation of soil evaporation (Es), plant transpiration (Ec), and precipitation interception (Ei) based on soil and canopy resistances. Despite the availability of several ET products and algorithms, comprehensive evaluations of resistance configurations remain scarce. This study systematically evaluates various combinations of five soil resistance methods, eight canopy resistance methods, and two precipitation interception algorithms within the Shuttleworth‐Wallace (S‐W) framework. Using eddy covariance data from 119 FLUXNET sites and the latest ET products, we find that the Ball‐Berry‐Leuning method, unified stomatal method, and RL empirical method provide comparable and top‐ranked performance across plant functional types (PFTs) and climate zones, with only a single free parameter calibrated by genetic algorithm. The power function method (S2), sensitive to soil surface water content proves to be the most effective for modeling Es, particularly in water‐limited regions. The performance of best‐performing but unexplored combinations (S2‐C1, S2‐C2, S2‐C5) is consistent with PML‐V2, GLEAM4, and underlying water use efficiency model, explaining 56% of the variation in daily ET and achieving an root mean square error as low as 1.02 mm day−1. However, these models show reduced accuracy in arid zones, where prolonged water stress led to a 38% reduction in R2. This highlights the need for a more accurate representation of soil moisture stress in arid regions, which is often overlooked in existing models. Our study offers robust, parsimonious, and broadly applicable models for ET estimation across PFTs and climate zones.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039252transpirationevaporationcanopy resistancesoil resistancePFTs
spellingShingle Jinfeng Zhao
Shikun Sun
Yali Yin
Yihe Tang
Chong Li
Yongshan Liang
Yubao Wang
Alexander Winkler
Shijie Jiang
Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations
transpiration
evaporation
canopy resistance
soil resistance
PFTs
title Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations
title_full Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations
title_fullStr Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations
title_full_unstemmed Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations
title_short Advancing Evapotranspiration Modeling With Optimized Soil and Canopy Resistance Combinations
title_sort advancing evapotranspiration modeling with optimized soil and canopy resistance combinations
topic transpiration
evaporation
canopy resistance
soil resistance
PFTs
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039252
work_keys_str_mv AT jinfengzhao advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT shikunsun advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT yaliyin advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT yihetang advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT chongli advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT yongshanliang advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT yubaowang advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT alexanderwinkler advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations
AT shijiejiang advancingevapotranspirationmodelingwithoptimizedsoilandcanopyresistancecombinations