Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes
Introduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse. Research question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF. Material and methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expand...
| Published in: | Brain and Spine |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-01-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267 |
| _version_ | 1849555306937319424 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin N. Stienen Gregor Fischer Linda Bättig Anand Veeravagu Benjamin Martens |
| author_facet | Martin N. Stienen Gregor Fischer Linda Bättig Anand Veeravagu Benjamin Martens |
| author_sort | Martin N. Stienen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Brain and Spine |
| description | Introduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse. Research question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF. Material and methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024. Results: We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 – L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3–7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months. Discussion and conclusion: The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cd5ec6a50e134790a379a3f8d15e894e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2772-5294 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-cd5ec6a50e134790a379a3f8d15e894e2025-08-20T02:37:52ZengElsevierBrain and Spine2772-52942024-01-01410287010.1016/j.bas.2024.102870Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomesMartin N. Stienen0Gregor Fischer1Linda Bättig2Anand Veeravagu3Benjamin Martens4Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Corresponding author. Board-certified neurosurgeon (FMH), Fellow of the European Board of Neurological Surgeons (FEBNS), Senior attending, Department of Neurosurgery, Co-chair, Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital of St.Gallen & Medical School of St.Gallen, Rorschacher Str. 95, CH-9007, St.Gallen, Switzerland.Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandSpine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USASpine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandIntroduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse. Research question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF. Material and methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024. Results: We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 – L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3–7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months. Discussion and conclusion: The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267Lateral lumbar interbody fusionLateral thoracic interbody fusionExpandable spacerComplicationsSagittal parametersOutcome |
| spellingShingle | Martin N. Stienen Gregor Fischer Linda Bättig Anand Veeravagu Benjamin Martens Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes Lateral lumbar interbody fusion Lateral thoracic interbody fusion Expandable spacer Complications Sagittal parameters Outcome |
| title | Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes |
| title_full | Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes |
| title_fullStr | Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes |
| title_short | Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes |
| title_sort | minimally invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion llif with expandable interbody cages considerations complications amp outcomes |
| topic | Lateral lumbar interbody fusion Lateral thoracic interbody fusion Expandable spacer Complications Sagittal parameters Outcome |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martinnstienen minimallyinvasivelateralthoracicandlumbarinterbodyfusionllifwithexpandableinterbodycagesconsiderationscomplicationsampoutcomes AT gregorfischer minimallyinvasivelateralthoracicandlumbarinterbodyfusionllifwithexpandableinterbodycagesconsiderationscomplicationsampoutcomes AT lindabattig minimallyinvasivelateralthoracicandlumbarinterbodyfusionllifwithexpandableinterbodycagesconsiderationscomplicationsampoutcomes AT anandveeravagu minimallyinvasivelateralthoracicandlumbarinterbodyfusionllifwithexpandableinterbodycagesconsiderationscomplicationsampoutcomes AT benjaminmartens minimallyinvasivelateralthoracicandlumbarinterbodyfusionllifwithexpandableinterbodycagesconsiderationscomplicationsampoutcomes |
